CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 8024P

CORE STATE Siena

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 32 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 90W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4c

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

INTEL

Core 7 240H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H

CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo

CACHE 24 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 45W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

1,761

2,053

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

248

289

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

7,338

8,558

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

1,035

1,208

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

17,472

20,378

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

2,466

2,877

passmark_data_compression

232,242

271,774

passmark_data_encryption

15,809

15,155

passmark_extended_instructions

14,251

16,897

passmark_find_prime_numbers

109

102

passmark_floating_point_math

34,757

58,905

passmark_integer_math

62,128

80,396

passmark_multithread

20,556

23,975

passmark_physics

1,905

1,723

passmark_random_string_sorting

34,613

28,866

passmark_single_thread

2,371

3,782

passmark_singlethread

2,371

3,782

Analysis: AMD EPYC 8024P vs Intel Core 7 240H

During this direct matchup, AMD EPYC 8024P (AMD) stands as the undisputed victor. Its score numbers show notable leads in most single-threaded scenarios. If you're putting together a high-performance PC, AMD EPYC 8024P (AMD) delivers superior capability at this tier. The chip handles heavy tasks with ease. This is specifically obvious in real-world applications.

In-game tests furthermore benefit AMD EPYC 8024P (AMD) in this comparison. Better frame rates and enhanced steady frame times emerge from the stronger single-threaded performance. Players might experience enhanced gameplay, specifically in CPU-demanding titles. This superiority remains across multiple settings. Multiplayer games specifically gains from this speed superiority.

Ultimately: AMD EPYC 8024P (AMD) claims this comparison convincingly. Consumers seeking power might seriously select AMD EPYC 8024P (AMD) over Intel Core 7 240H. This score evidence confirms this assessment. Your applications will gain from the superior performance. It's a straightforward victor in this category.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 8024P

7 240H

Core Specs

Cores

10 +25.0%

Threads

16 0.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.4

2.5 +4.2%

Boost Clock (GHz)

5.2 +73.3%

Frequency (GHz)

2.4

2.5 +4.2%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

5.2 +73.3%

Multiplier

25 +4.2%

SMP CPUs

1 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

32 MB (shared)

24 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

45 -50.0%

PL1

—

45 W

PL2

—

115 W

Configurable TDP

70-100 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4c

Raptor Lake

Codename

Siena

Raptor Lake-H

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))

Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

5 nm

10 nm

Transistors

8,875 million

—

Die Size

73 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Six-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

230.4 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

5200 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP6

Intel BGA 1744

Chipsets

—

WM790, HM770

PCIe

Gen 5, 96 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)

Intel Hybrid

Hybrid Cores

—

P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4

E-Core Frequency

—

1800 MHz up to 4 GHz

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

Iris Xe Graphics 64EU

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Mobile

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$409

$502

Part Number

100-000001136

SRQ6TQ5ML

Package

FC-LGA4844

FC-BGA16F

Tj Max

—

100°C

Bundled Cooler

None

—

View EPYC 8024P Details View Core 7 240H Details