Intel Core 7 150UL vs Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus Comparison

Intel Core 7 150UL and Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus occupy very different positions in the database. The Core 7 150UL is a 10-core, 12-thread Raptor Lake-PS desktop part with a 15 W TDP, while the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake-HX Refresh mobile processor with a 55 W TDP. The recorded data shows a stark performance gap, with the 270HX Plus scoring in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs and the 150UL sitting at the 50th percentile. This analysis walks through the benchmark results, architectural differences, and the specific workloads where each processor holds an advantage.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus wins every recorded benchmark comparison. The data shows no test where the Core 7 150UL outperforms the 270HX Plus, as the head-to-head benchmark list is empty and the wins count stands at 0 for the 150UL versus 17 for the 270HX Plus. This is not a close contest; the 270HX Plus delivers decisively higher scores across all measured categories.

The 270HX Plus excels in heavily threaded workloads, which aligns with its 20-core, 20-thread configuration. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 41913 places it in a performance tier that rivals desktop flagship processors from the same generation. The PassMark multithread score of 48270 reinforces this strength, demonstrating exceptional parallel processing capability. For users running rendering, video encoding, or scientific simulations, the data confirms this processor is built for sustained multi-core throughput.

The Core 7 150UL, by contrast, is a low-power desktop part. Its 15 W TDP and 10-core, 12-thread layout suggest a focus on efficiency rather than raw performance. While the database does not include individual benchmark scores for the 150UL, its 50th percentile ranking indicates it performs at the median level of all CPUs. This places it as a capable processor for everyday tasks, light productivity, and general desktop use, but it does not compete with the 270HX Plus in any measured metric.

In terms of database percentile, the 270HX Plus sits at 93, meaning it outperforms 93% of all CPUs tracked. The 150UL at 50 sits exactly at the midpoint. The average benchmark score for the 270HX Plus is 61834, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i9-13900KF at 61841, a delta of 0%. This positions the 270HX Plus as a top-tier performer, while the 150UL has no recorded average score, further indicating its lower standing.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural eras and manufacturing processes. The Core 7 150UL uses Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS codename, built on Intel's 10 nm process. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus uses Arrow Lake-HX Refresh, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. This process difference is significant, as the 3 nm node allows for higher transistor density and improved power efficiency, which is reflected in the 270HX Plus carrying 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The 150UL has 10 cores and 12 threads, indicating a hybrid configuration with performance and efficiency cores. The 270HX Plus has 20 cores and 20 threads, meaning it does not use hyperthreading but relies on its core count for parallelism. This gives the 270HX Plus double the physical cores of the 150UL.

Cache hierarchies are also different. The 150UL has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The 270HX Plus has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger cache sizes on the 270HX Plus provide more on-die storage for frequently accessed data, which helps in compute-intensive tasks.

Clock speeds favor the 270HX Plus. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, compared to the 150UL's 1.70 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost. The higher boost clock on the 270HX Plus contributes to its superior single-thread performance, while the higher base clock helps maintain sustained multi-core throughput.

Memory support differs as well. The 150UL supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the 270HX Plus supports only DDR5. The 270HX Plus has a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, while the 150UL has no bandwidth figure in the database. Both use dual-channel memory buses. PCIe connectivity also differs: the 150UL offers Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the 270HX Plus offers Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), providing more bandwidth for expansion devices.

Integrated graphics differ. The 150UL uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while the 270HX Plus uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. Despite fewer execution units, the Arc architecture is more modern and likely offers different feature support. The 270HX Plus also has an unlocked multiplier, while the 150UL does not, allowing overclocking on the former.

The market segments differ: the 150UL is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700, while the 270HX Plus is a mobile processor on Intel BGA 2114. The 270HX Plus is from the Core Ultra Series 2, while the 150UL has no series designation. Release dates place the 150UL in April 2024 and the 270HX Plus in March 2026, showing a nearly two-year gap in launch timing.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors. However, the 270HX Plus has a full set of benchmark scores, and its performance can be contextualized using its nearest rivals. The 270HX Plus scores 4224 in Cinebench R15 multicore, 596 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 17603 multicore and 2485 single-core. Cinebench R23 shows 41913 multicore and 5917 single-core.

PassMark results for the 270HX Plus further detail its strengths. Data compression scores 493179, data encryption scores 37813, and extended instructions score 39283. Finding prime numbers scores 482, floating point math scores 163567, and integer math scores 122449. Multithread performance scores 48270, physics scores 3843, and random string sorting scores 60020. Single-thread performance scores 4764 in both PassMark single-thread tests.

The nearest rivals for the 270HX Plus are all Intel Core i9 processors. The Intel Core i9-13900KF has an average score of 61841, a delta of 0% from the 270HX Plus. The Intel Core i9-13900K scores 61766, a delta of 0.1%. The Intel Core i9-13900T scores 61723, a delta of 0.2%. The Intel Xeon 636 scores 61360, a delta of 0.8%. These deltas show the 270HX Plus is effectively tied with the i9-13900KF and i9-13900K in average benchmark performance, making it a high-end part that matches desktop flagship silicon.

The 150UL has no benchmark scores in the database, so its exact performance cannot be quantified. Its 50th percentile ranking indicates it sits at the median of all CPUs. The 270HX Plus at the 93rd percentile is far above this level. In practical terms, the 270HX Plus would deliver roughly double the multi-core performance of the 150UL based on core count and clock speed differences, though exact numbers are not available for the 150UL.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus than the Core 7 150UL?

A: The database does not record direct head-to-head benchmarks, so an exact percentage cannot be calculated. However, the 270HX Plus has a 93rd percentile ranking versus 50th for the 150UL, and the 270HX Plus has double the cores, higher clocks, and a 3 nm process, indicating a substantial performance lead.

Q: Which processor has better single-thread performance?

A: The 270HX Plus has a higher boost clock of 5.30 GHz versus 5.00 GHz for the 150UL. Its PassMark single-thread score of 4764 reflects strong single-core capability, though the 150UL has no recorded score for direct comparison.

Q: Are these processors interchangeable in terms of socket compatibility?

A: No. The 150UL uses Intel Socket 1700 for desktops, while the 270HX Plus uses Intel BGA 2114 for mobile systems. They are not compatible with the same motherboards.

Q: Does the 270HX Plus support overclocking?

A: Yes, the 270HX Plus has an unlocked multiplier, which allows overclocking. The 150UL does not have an unlocked multiplier.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The 150UL supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the 270HX Plus supports only DDR5. The 270HX Plus has a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, while the 150UL has no bandwidth figure.

Q: How does the 270HX Plus compare to the Core i9-13900K?

A: The 270HX Plus has an average benchmark score of 61834, while the Core i9-13900K scores 61766, a delta of 0.1%. This means the 270HX Plus is statistically tied with the i9-13900K in average performance.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is the superior processor by a wide margin. It wins all 17 recorded benchmark tests, sits at the 93rd percentile, and matches the performance of desktop Core i9 processors from a previous generation. Its 20 cores, 30 MB of L3 cache, 5.30 GHz boost clock, and 3 nm process make it a high-end part suitable for demanding multi-threaded workloads and heavy productivity tasks.

The Core 7 150UL, with its 10 cores, 12 MB of cache, and 15 W TDP, is positioned for efficiency and basic desktop use. Its 50th percentile ranking shows it is an average performer, adequate for standard computing but not designed for intensive processing. The 55 W TDP of the 270HX Plus versus 15 W for the 150UL reflects the performance difference, with the former consuming more power to deliver significantly more throughput.

Users requiring maximum performance from a mobile platform should choose the 270HX Plus. Its benchmark results in Cinebench R23, PassMark multithread, and other tests confirm its capability for rendering, encoding, and computation. Users building a low-power desktop for everyday tasks should consider the 150UL, which offers sufficient performance for general use while maintaining a minimal power footprint. The choice depends on the workload: raw performance points to the 270HX Plus, while efficiency and low power point to the 150UL.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 7 150UL | Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 20 |

| Threads | 12 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 1.70 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.30 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 55 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 2114 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Arrow Lake-HX Refresh |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not listed | 17,800 million |

| Die Size | Not listed | 243 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 30 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 102.4 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Release Date | 2024-04-07 | 2026-03-16 |