Intel Core 7 150UL vs Intel Core Ultra 3 205 Comparison

Intel Core 7 150UL and Intel Core Ultra 3 205 target different desktop segments, and the recorded data shows a clear split in their strengths. The Core Ultra 3 205 is the faster processor in almost every measurable benchmark, while the Core 7 150UL offers a lower power envelope and a different platform approach. The benchmark results indicate that the Core Ultra 3 205 is the performance leader, with the Core 7 150UL serving as a more power-conscious alternative.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 3 205 dominates the performance categories. It holds the advantage in all recorded Cinebench tests, including multi-core and single-core workloads. Its PassMark scores are also consistently higher across integer math, floating point math, encryption, compression, and physics simulations. The data shows the Core Ultra 3 205 is the clear choice for compute-heavy tasks.

The Intel Core 7 150UL wins in one specific area: power consumption. Its TDP is 15 watts compared to the Core Ultra 3 205's 57 watts. This is a substantial difference, indicating the Core 7 150UL is designed for systems where thermal output and energy draw are primary concerns. The Core 7 150UL also supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, which may appeal to users with existing memory infrastructure. However, in raw processing speed, the Core 7 150UL does not win any of the recorded benchmark comparisons.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations. The Intel Core 7 150UL uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS codename, built on Intel's 10 nm process. The Intel Core Ultra 3 205 uses Arrow Lake architecture, with the Arrow Lake-S codename, and is manufactured on TSMC's 3 nm process. This process difference is significant, as the Core Ultra 3 205 relies on a more advanced fabrication node.

The Core Ultra 3 205 has 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, while the Core 7 150UL has no transistor or die size data recorded. The Core Ultra 3 205 uses a newer socket, Intel Socket 1851, compared to the Core 7 150UL's Intel Socket 1700. The Core Ultra 3 205 also features PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, whereas the Core 7 150UL uses PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes. This gives the Core Ultra 3 205 a major advantage in expansion and data transfer capabilities.

The integrated graphics differ substantially. The Core 7 150UL includes Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while the Core Ultra 3 205 has Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with only 16 execution units. The Core 7 150UL likely has a stronger integrated graphics solution for display workloads, although no graphics benchmarks are recorded in the data.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core Ultra 3 205 shows large wins in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core Ultra 3 205 scores 19856. The Core 7 150UL has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so direct percentage comparisons cannot be calculated. The absence of scores for the Core 7 150UL means the Core Ultra 3 205's performance stands alone in the recorded data.

The Core Ultra 3 205's single-core performance is also impressive. It scores 2803 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4575 in PassMark single-thread. These numbers place it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, a strong showing. The Core 7 150UL sits at the 50th percentile, indicating it is an average performer relative to the entire CPU market.

In PassMark tests, the Core Ultra 3 205 delivers strong results across the board. It scores 54755 in integer math, 75136 in floating point math, and 260651 in data compression. The data encryption score is 18772, and the extended instructions score is 22578. The physics test yields 2016, and random string sorting produces 31083. The Core Ultra 3 205 also handles prime number calculations with a score of 268.

The Core Ultra 3 205's average benchmark score is 31473. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core 7 240H with an average score of 31483 and a delta of 0, the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX at 31495 with a delta of -0.1, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H at 31508 with a delta of -0.1, and the Intel Core i5-13500 at 31510 with a delta of -0.1. These rivals are all within 0.1 percent of the Core Ultra 3 205's score, showing it competes at the same level as those processors.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ. The Intel Core 7 150UL has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 3 205 has 8 cores and 8 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the Core Ultra 3 205 outperforms the Core 7 150UL in the recorded benchmarks.

Clock speeds favor the Core Ultra 3 205 in base frequency. The Core Ultra 3 205 has a base clock of 3.80 GHz, compared to the Core 7 150UL's 1.70 GHz. The boost clocks are closer, with the Core Ultra 3 205 reaching 4.90 GHz and the Core 7 150UL reaching 5.00 GHz. The Core 7 150UL has a slightly higher maximum boost clock.

Cache configurations also differ. The Core 7 150UL has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 3 205 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 15 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 3 205 has larger cache at every level.

Memory support shows a split. The Core 7 150UL supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 3 205 supports only DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory. The Core Ultra 3 205 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, while the Core 7 150UL has no bandwidth figure recorded. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

The TDP difference is notable. The Core 7 150UL has a TDP of 15 watts, while the Core Ultra 3 205 has a TDP of 57 watts. This indicates the Core 7 150UL is intended for power-constrained environments.

Release dates differ. The Core 7 150UL was released on 2024-04-07, while the Core Ultra 3 205 was released on 2025-07-31. The Core Ultra 3 205 has a launch MSRP of $140. Both processors have locked multipliers. The Core Ultra 3 205 has a part number of SRVFC, while the Core 7 150UL's part number is listed as unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 3 205 has 8 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL has a TDP of 15 watts, while the Intel Core Ultra 3 205 has a TDP of 57 watts.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core Ultra 3 205's 4.90 GHz.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Intel Core Ultra 3 205 supports DDR5 only.

Q: Which processor has better single-core performance?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 3 205 scores 2803 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4575 in PassMark single-thread, while the Intel Core 7 150UL has no recorded benchmark scores.

Q: What is the process node for each?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL uses Intel's 10 nm process, while the Intel Core Ultra 3 205 uses TSMC's 3 nm process.

The Verdict

The Intel Core Ultra 3 205 is the stronger processor based on the recorded data. It delivers superior performance across all benchmark categories, with an average benchmark score of 31473 and an 82nd percentile ranking. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.1 percent of its average score, confirming it sits in a highly competitive performance tier. The Core Ultra 3 205 offers modern architecture, a 3 nm process node, PCIe Gen 5 support, and larger cache, making it the better choice for users who prioritize processing speed and system responsiveness.

The Intel Core 7 150UL is the appropriate pick for users who prioritize power efficiency. Its 15 watt TDP is dramatically lower than the Core Ultra 3 205's 57 watts. It also supports DDR4 memory, which could be relevant for certain upgrade paths. The Core 7 150UL's 50th percentile ranking indicates average performance relative to all CPUs, and its lack of recorded benchmark scores means it cannot directly compete with the Core Ultra 3 205 on performance metrics.

The data shows a clear performance hierarchy. The Core Ultra 3 205 wins on multi-core and single-core workloads, memory bandwidth, cache size, and PCIe capability. The Core 7 150UL wins on power draw and memory compatibility. Users who need maximum compute performance should select the Core Ultra 3 205. Users who need minimal power consumption and DDR4 support should select the Core 7 150UL.