Intel Core 7 150UL vs Intel Core i9-14901E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Core 7 150UL and the Intel Core i9-14901E. However, the database provides a full benchmark profile for the Core i9-14901E, while the Core 7 150UL has no recorded benchmark scores. This absence of data for the Core 7 150UL means the comparison relies entirely on the Core i9-14901E's measured performance and its position among rival processors.

The Core i9-14901E shows strong multi-core capability in Cinebench tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 25,753 points. Its single-core score in the same test is 3,635. Cinebench R20 results show 10,816 multi-core and 1,526 single-core. In the older Cinebench R15 test, the processor delivers 2,595 multi-core and 366 single-core. These figures place the Core i9-14901E in the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 37,911.

PassMark results for the Core i9-14901E further illustrate its strengths. The integer math test records 112,736, floating point math reaches 81,089, and extended instructions score 17,249. Data compression scores 288,777, while data encryption hits 18,571. The multithread score is 30,298, and single-thread performance is 4,354. Physics processing records 3,041, random string sorting reaches 39,138, and prime number finding scores 189.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for the Core i9-14901E's standing. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has an average score of 37,904, a 0% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,943, which is 0.1% higher. The Intel Core 5 211E scores 37,829, 0.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37,804, 0.3% lower. These delta percentages indicate the Core i9-14901E sits in a tightly clustered performance group, with all four rivals within 0.3% of its score.

Architecture Differences

Both processors use the Raptor Lake architecture and are built on Intel's 10 nm process node. They share the same L1 cache configuration of 80 KB per core and both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus. Both use the Intel Socket 1700 and are classified as desktop market segments.

The Core 7 150UL carries the Raptor Lake-PS codename, while the Core i9-14901E uses Raptor Lake-R. The Core 7 150UL belongs to the Core 7 generation (Raptor Lake-PS), whereas the Core i9-14901E is part of the Core 14th Gen series (Raptor Lake Refresh). This generation difference matters because the Core i9-14901E benefits from a refresh cycle that typically includes refined binning and potential clock improvements.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The Core 7 150UL has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the Core i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Core i9-14901E's higher thread count comes from hyperthreading on all 8 cores, whereas the Core 7 150UL's 12 threads indicate a hybrid configuration with fewer hyperthreaded cores. The Core i9-14901E also has a larger L2 cache at 2 MB per core versus 1.25 MB per core for the Core 7 150UL, and its L3 cache is 36 MB shared compared to 12 MB shared.

Clock speeds differ significantly. The Core 7 150UL has a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Core i9-14901E starts at 2.80 GHz base and boosts to 5.60 GHz. Thermal design power also differs: the Core 7 150UL is rated at 15 W, while the Core i9-14901E is rated at 65 W. This power envelope difference explains why the Core i9-14901E can sustain higher clocks under load.

PCIe capabilities separate the two. The Core 7 150UL supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the Core i9-14901E supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ as well: the Core 7 150UL uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while the Core i9-14901E uses UHD Graphics 770. ECC memory support is available only on the Core i9-14901E. The Core i9-14901E also has a recorded die size of 257 mm², while the Core 7 150UL has no die size data. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Release dates show the Core 7 150UL launched earlier on April 7, 2024, while the Core i9-14901E followed on June 30, 2024. Both processors remain in active production.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL has 10 cores, while the Intel Core i9-14901E has 8 cores. However, the Core i9-14901E has 16 threads versus 12 threads for the Core 7 150UL.

Q: How do their boost clocks compare?

A: The Core i9-14901E boosts to 5.60 GHz, which is higher than the Core 7 150UL's 5.00 GHz boost clock. The base clocks are 2.80 GHz and 1.70 GHz, respectively.

Q: What is the L3 cache difference?

A: The Core i9-14901E has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, three times the 12 MB shared L3 cache found on the Core 7 150UL. The L2 cache also differs, with 2 MB per core on the Core i9-14901E versus 1.25 MB per core on the Core 7 150UL.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Core i9-14901E supports ECC memory, while the Core 7 150UL does not. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode.

Q: How does the Core i9-14901E compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Core i9-14901E has an average benchmark score of 37,911. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37,904, 0% difference), AMD Ryzen 7 9700X (37,943, 0.1% higher), Intel Core 5 211E (37,829, 0.2% lower), and AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (37,804, 0.3% lower). It sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The Core i9-14901E has a TDP of 65 W, compared to 15 W for the Core 7 150UL. This reflects the Core i9-14901E's higher sustained performance capability.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 7 150UL | Intel Core i9-14901E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 1.70 GHz | 2.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.60 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 65 W |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 257 mm² |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | UHD Graphics 770 |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-PS | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Core 7 (Raptor Lake-PS) | Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Part Number | Unknown | Q49ESRNJH |

| Release Date | 2024-04-07 | 2024-06-30 |

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear performance hierarchy. The Core i9-14901E delivers substantial multi-core and single-core scores across all Cinebench and PassMark tests, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The Core 7 150UL has no recorded benchmark scores, so its measured performance cannot be directly compared. However, its specification profile suggests a different purpose.

The Core i9-14901E's 65 W TDP, 5.60 GHz boost, 36 MB L3 cache, and 16 threads align with high-performance desktop workloads. Its benchmark scores confirm this: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 25,753 and single-core of 3,635, plus PassMark multithread of 30,298 and single-thread of 4,354. These numbers place it in a tight competitive group with processors like the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, all within 0.3% of each other.

The Core 7 150UL, with its 15 W TDP and 10 cores but only 12 threads, appears designed for efficiency-constrained scenarios. Its lower base clock of 1.70 GHz and smaller caches (12 MB L3, 1.25 MB L2 per core) suggest it targets workloads where power consumption matters more than peak performance. The Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units may offer stronger integrated graphics capability than the UHD Graphics 770, but no benchmark data confirms this.

Users seeking maximum compute performance from the data should choose the Core i9-14901E. Its measured results demonstrate leadership in multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks. Users with strict power budgets or those prioritizing integrated graphics capabilities might consider the Core 7 150UL, but its lack of benchmark data means its real-world performance remains unverified in the database.

Where Each One Wins

Intel Core i9-14901E wins on: Measured multi-core performance. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,753 and R20 multi-core of 10,816 indicate strong parallel processing. PassMark multithread score of 30,298 and integer math of 112,736 further support compute-heavy workloads. Its 16 threads, 36 MB L3 cache, and 5.60 GHz boost clock provide the resources for sustained high output. The 65 W TDP enables these clocks without power throttling in typical desktop environments. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes offers faster data transfer to compatible devices. ECC memory support benefits reliability-sensitive applications.

Intel Core 7 150UL wins on: Power efficiency. At 15 W TDP, it consumes one-quarter the power of the Core i9-14901E. Its 10 cores provide parallel processing capability, though with fewer threads (12 versus 16). The Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units likely delivers superior integrated graphics output, though no benchmark scores verify this. The lower base clock of 1.70 GHz suggests quieter operation and lower cooling requirements. Its earlier release date of April 7, 2024, gives it a slight availability lead. For scenarios where energy consumption is paramount, the Core 7 150UL's specification profile indicates a clear advantage, even without benchmark confirmation.