Intel Core 7 150UL vs Intel Core i7-14701TE Comparison

Intel Core 7 150UL and Intel Core i7-14701TE are both desktop processors built for the Intel Socket 1700 platform, yet the recorded data places them in different performance tiers. The Core i7-14701TE holds an average benchmark score of 26013, while the Core 7 150UL has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The Core i7-14701TE also sits at the 78th percentile among all CPUs tested, compared to the Core 7 150UL’s 50th percentile. This gap in measured results shapes the entire comparison, though architectural differences explain why the two chips are not direct substitutes in every workload.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE records an average benchmark score of 26013. The Intel Core 7 150UL has no recorded average benchmark score in the database, as its benchmark list is empty.

Q: How do the core and thread counts differ between the two?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL uses 10 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i7-14701TE uses 8 cores and 16 threads. The i7-14701TE thus has fewer physical cores but more threads, indicating a different hybrid arrangement.

Q: What are the base and boost clock differences?

A: The Core 7 150UL has a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Core i7-14701TE has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The i7-14701TE runs faster at both the low end and the high end.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Core i7-14701TE supports ECC memory, while the Core 7 150UL does not. This makes the i7-14701TE more suitable for error-correcting memory configurations.

Q: How does the L3 cache compare?

A: The Core 7 150UL has 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i7-14701TE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, nearly three times larger.

Q: What PCIe generation and lane counts are provided?

A: The Core 7 150UL uses PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The Core i7-14701TE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The i7-14701TE offers both a newer generation and double the lane count.

The Verdict

The data points to the Intel Core i7-14701TE as the stronger performer in every measured category. Its average benchmark score of 26013 places it at the 78th percentile, a clear step above the Core 7 150UL’s unmeasured 50th percentile standing. The i7-14701TE also delivers higher single-core and multi-core scores across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, as well as superior PassMark results in integer math, floating point math, encryption, compression, and physics tests. For any workload that depends on raw CPU throughput, the i7-14701TE is the only choice supported by recorded data.

The Core 7 150UL, however, is not without rationale for selection. It consumes a 15 W TDP compared to the i7-14701TE’s 45 W TDP. That threefold difference in thermal design power suggests the Core 7 150UL fits into power-constrained systems, compact desktops, or passive cooling designs. It also integrates Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, which is a more capable integrated GPU than the i7-14701TE’s UHD Graphics 770 in terms of execution units, though no benchmark scores confirm this advantage. The Core 7 150UL offers 10 cores versus 8, which may appeal in lightly threaded scenarios where additional physical cores matter, but its lower clocks and smaller cache limit its ceiling.

Users who need maximum performance from a Socket 1700 desktop CPU should pick the i7-14701TE. Users who prioritize low power draw and integrated graphics capability should pick the Core 7 150UL, accepting that its performance is unverified in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors, but the i7-14701TE has a full suite of scores while the Core 7 150UL has none. This asymmetry means every comparison relies on the i7-14701TE’s absolute numbers and the architectural differences between the two.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i7-14701TE scores 1716. Its single-core score is 242. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score rises to 7154 and single-core to 1010. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core result reaches 17035, with a single-core score of 2405. These numbers establish a baseline for a high-end desktop chip. The Core 7 150UL has no equivalent scores, so no direct delta can be computed.

PassMark results for the i7-14701TE further quantify its strengths. Integer math scores 65792, floating point math scores 50219, and extended instructions (SIMD) scores 14354. Data encryption scores 11699, data compression scores 220520, and random string sorting scores 22760. Find prime numbers scores 143, physics scores 1860, and multithread scores 20042. Single-thread performance is recorded at 2637. These results indicate a processor that handles both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy tasks with ease, plus strong SIMD throughput.

Because the Core 7 150UL lacks any recorded scores, the head-to-head section necessarily becomes a one-sided analysis. The i7-14701TE’s percentile of 78 versus the Core 7 150UL’s 50 suggests that the latter would likely trail in most benchmarks, but the database cannot confirm by how much. The nearest rivals for the i7-14701TE provide context: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 scores 25981 (0.1% lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS scores 26106 (0.4% higher), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE scores 25880 (0.5% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26187 (0.7% higher). The i7-14701TE sits in a tight cluster, meaning its performance is comparable to these mid-range AMD chips, all within roughly one percent of each other.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several core specifications. The Core 7 150UL has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads. This means the i7-14701TE uses fewer physical cores but leverages hyper-threading to reach 16 threads, while the Core 7 150UL has more physical cores but only 12 threads. The i7-14701TE’s thread count is 33% higher, which benefits heavily threaded workloads.

Clock speeds also differ. The Core 7 150UL runs at 1.70 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost. The i7-14701TE runs at 2.10 GHz base and 5.20 GHz boost. The i7-14701TE is 23.5% faster at base and 4% faster at boost.

TDP differs dramatically: the Core 7 150UL has a 15 W TDP, while the i7-14701TE has a 45 W TDP. This is a threefold difference, indicating the Core 7 150UL is designed for low-power operation, while the i7-14701TE targets higher sustained performance at the cost of more heat.

Cache configurations diverge significantly. The Core 7 150UL has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. The i7-14701TE has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB shared L3. The i7-14701TE’s L2 cache is 60% larger per core, and its L3 cache is 175% larger.

Memory support is identical in type: both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory buses. However, the i7-14701TE supports ECC memory, while the Core 7 150UL does not. The i7-14701TE also uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, versus the Core 7 150UL’s PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes. This doubles both the generation and the lane count.

Integrated graphics differ: the Core 7 150UL uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while the i7-14701TE uses UHD Graphics 770. The former has more execution units, suggesting better graphics throughput, though no benchmark data confirms this.

The i7-14701TE has a die size of 257 mm², while the Core 7 150UL has no recorded die size. Both use a 10 nm process node and are fabricated by Intel. The i7-14701TE was released on 2024-06-30, while the Core 7 150UL was released on 2024-04-07, making the latter earlier by nearly three months.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the Raptor Lake architecture, but they belong to different sub-families. The Core 7 150UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS codename, which is part of the Core 7 generation. The i7-14701TE uses the Raptor Lake-R codename, belonging to the Core 14th Gen series and the Raptor Lake Refresh generation.

The process node is identical at 10 nm, and both are manufactured by Intel. The Core 7 150UL has no recorded transistor count or die size, while the i7-14701TE has a die size of 257 mm².

The core architecture differs in layout. The Core 7 150UL has 10 cores and 12 threads, which suggests a hybrid design with performance cores and efficiency cores, where some efficiency cores do not have hyper-threading. The i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads, indicating all cores support hyper-threading, likely using a different mix of performance and efficiency cores.

Cache architecture also differs. The Core 7 150UL has 1.25 MB L2 per core, while the i7-14701TE has 2 MB L2 per core. This larger per-core L2 in the i7-14701TE reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data. The L3 cache size difference is even more pronounced: 12 MB shared versus 33 MB shared. The i7-14701TE’s larger L3 allows more data to stay on-chip, reducing reliance on system memory.

The i7-14701TE supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the Core 7 150UL. This indicates the i7-14701TE targets workloads where data integrity is critical, such as server or workstation tasks. The PCIe difference also reflects this: PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes provides double the bandwidth of PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes, which matters for high-throughput peripherals like GPUs or NVMe storage.

The integrated graphics differ in architecture tier. Iris Xe Graphics 96EU represents Intel’s higher-end integrated GPU, while UHD Graphics 770 belongs to the older Xe-LP family with fewer execution units. The Core 7 150UL’s graphics may handle more demanding display tasks, but the i7-14701TE’s graphics are still sufficient for basic output.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14701TE wins in every recorded benchmark category. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17035 indicates strong multi-threaded performance, ideal for video rendering, 3D modeling, code compilation, and scientific simulations. The single-core score of 2405 in R23 shows high per-thread performance, benefiting games and lightly threaded applications. The PassMark multithread score of 20042 and physics score of 1860 reinforce this multi-core advantage.

The i7-14701TE also excels in data-intensive workloads. Its data compression score of 220520 and data encryption score of 11699 show strong throughput for file archiving, database operations, and encrypted communications. The integer math score of 65792 and floating point math score of 50219 indicate balanced processing across both arithmetic types. The extended instructions score of 14354 reflects robust SIMD support for vectorized code. Random string sorting scores 22760, indicating efficient sorting operations. Find prime numbers scores 143, which is a lower absolute number but still a valid measurement of prime-counting throughput.

The Intel Core 7 150UL wins in power efficiency. Its 15 W TDP is one-third of the i7-14701TE’s 45 W TDP. This makes the Core 7 150UL suitable for systems where heat dissipation and electricity consumption are primary concerns, such as small form factor desktops, fanless designs, or always-on machines. The Core 7 150UL also has more physical cores (10 versus 8), which could provide an advantage in workloads that scale with core count but not thread count, though no benchmarks confirm this.

The Core 7 150UL’s integrated graphics, Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, has more execution units than the i7-14701TE’s UHD Graphics 770. This suggests better integrated graphics performance for video playback, light gaming, or GPU-accelerated compute tasks, though again without benchmark scores to verify.

The i7-14701TE wins in memory flexibility due to ECC support, making it a better fit for error-sensitive applications like financial modeling, medical imaging, or long-running server processes. Its larger L3 cache (33 MB versus 12 MB) also gives it an edge in workloads with large working sets that fit in cache, such as certain data analytics or database queries.

The i7-14701TE’s PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes provides double the bandwidth of the Core 7 150UL’s PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes. This favors systems with high-end GPUs, multiple NVMe drives, or other bandwidth-hungry peripherals.

In summary, the i7-14701TE dominates all measured performance metrics and adds features like ECC, more cache, and faster PCIe. The Core 7 150UL offers a lower power draw, more physical cores, and a potentially better integrated GPU, but its lack of recorded benchmarks means its actual performance remains unverified in the database. For users who can tolerate higher power consumption, the i7-14701TE is the clear performance pick. For users who need minimal power draw above all else, the Core 7 150UL is the only option that meets that constraint, though its performance ceiling is unknown.