Intel Core 7 150UL vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head measurements for the Intel Core 7 150UL versus the Intel Core i5-14501TE. Both processors show an empty benchmark score array, with an average benchmark score of zero for each. The wins tally is likewise zero for both units, meaning the database has not yet produced comparative performance figures for this pairing.

Both CPUs occupy the 50th percentile among all processors tracked in the database. This percentile placement indicates that neither part has distinguished itself in aggregate performance rankings, sitting exactly at the median of the recorded CPU landscape. Without concrete benchmark scores, the percentile values offer the only quantitative performance signal available: both are mid-pack performers with no measurable separation.

The absence of head-to-head data does not prevent specification-level analysis, which reveals meaningful differences in core configuration, cache allocation, and platform capabilities. These architectural distinctions will likely translate into divergent workload behavior once benchmark data becomes available.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL has 10 cores, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores. Both processors support 12 threads, indicating that the Core 7 150UL relies on fewer performance cores with more efficient cores, whereas the Core i5-14501TE uses all 6 cores for threading.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock speeds?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE boosts to 5.10 GHz, which is 0.10 GHz higher than the Intel Core 7 150UL's 5.00 GHz boost clock. The base clocks differ more substantially: the Core i5-14501TE runs at 2.20 GHz base, compared to 1.70 GHz for the Core 7 150UL.

Q: How does the L3 cache compare between these two CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, exactly double the 12 MB shared L3 cache found in the Intel Core 7 150UL. Both processors share identical per-core L1 cache at 80 KB per core and L2 cache at 1.25 MB per core.

Q: Do these processors support ECC memory?

A: Only the Intel Core i5-14501TE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 150UL does not include ECC support. This is a meaningful distinction for workstation or server deployments where memory error correction is required.

Q: What PCIe generations and lane counts do they offer?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core 7 150UL offers PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The Core i5-14501TE delivers both a newer PCIe generation and double the lane count.

Q: Which processor has a smaller die size?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has a die size of 215 mm². The Intel Core 7 150UL does not have a recorded die size in the database, so no direct comparison is possible for this specification.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same fundamental Raptor Lake architecture, but they belong to different sub-families within that design. The Intel Core 7 150UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS codename and is classified under the Core 7 generation, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake-R codename and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series with a Raptor Lake Refresh generation label.

The process node is identical at 10 nm, fabricated by Intel for both parts. The Core i5-14501TE has a recorded die size of 215 mm², whereas the Core 7 150UL has no die size entry in the database. This suggests the Core i5-14501TE may use a larger physical die to accommodate its larger L3 cache and different core arrangement.

Core topology represents the most significant architectural divergence. The Core 7 150UL packs 10 cores into 12 threads, implying a hybrid configuration with fewer performance cores and additional efficiency cores. The Core i5-14501TE achieves 12 threads from just 6 cores, meaning every core supports two threads via simultaneous multithreading. The Core 7 150UL's 10-core/12-thread ratio indicates some cores lack hyperthreading, a characteristic typical of hybrid designs mixing performance and efficiency core types.

Cache architecture diverges sharply in the L3 tier. The Core i5-14501TE's 24 MB shared L3 cache doubles the Core 7 150UL's 12 MB shared L3. Per-core L1 and L2 caches match exactly at 80 KB and 1.25 MB respectively, so the L3 difference represents the primary cache advantage for the Core i5-14501TE.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 7 150UL ships with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while the Core i5-14501TE carries UHD Graphics 770. Both provide integrated display output, but the Iris Xe implementation with 96 execution units targets higher graphics throughput than the UHD 770.

PCIe capability separates the two platforms clearly. The Core i5-14501TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, versus the Core 7 150UL's PCIe Gen 4 with only 8 CPU lanes. This positions the Core i5-14501TE for higher-bandwidth expansion such as modern GPUs or NVMe storage, while the Core 7 150UL offers a more constrained I/O pathway.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several specification fields. Core count: the Core 7 150UL has 10 cores versus 6 for the Core i5-14501TE. Thread count matches at 12 threads for both. Base clock favors the Core i5-14501TE at 2.20 GHz versus 1.70 GHz. Boost clock also favors the Core i5-14501TE at 5.10 GHz versus 5.00 GHz.

Thermal design power differs substantially: the Core 7 150UL is rated at 15 W TDP, while the Core i5-14501TE draws 45 W TDP. This threefold TDP difference indicates the Core 7 150UL targets power-constrained environments, while the Core i5-14501TE has more thermal headroom for sustained performance.

L3 cache: the Core i5-14501TE provides 24 MB shared, the Core 7 150UL provides 12 MB shared. ECC memory support exists only on the Core i5-14501TE. PCIe generation and lanes: Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the Core i5-14501TE, Gen 4 with 8 lanes for the Core 7 150UL. Integrated graphics: Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on the Core 7 150UL, UHD Graphics 770 on the Core i5-14501TE.

Release dates differ by roughly three months: the Core 7 150UL launched on April 7, 2024, while the Core i5-14501TE launched on June 30, 2024. The Core i5-14501TE has a recorded part number (Q49KSRNJN), whereas the Core 7 150UL's part number is listed as unknown. Both use the Intel Socket 1700, support DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and are locked (multiplierUnlocked is false for both). Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 150UL wins on power efficiency and core count. Its 15 W TDP is one-third of the Core i5-14501TE's 45 W rating, making it the clear choice for thermally constrained systems, compact desktops, or always-on machines where heat dissipation and energy draw matter. The 10-core configuration provides more physical cores, which can benefit workloads that scale across many parallel threads without requiring high per-core frequency.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE wins on raw clock speed, cache capacity, and platform bandwidth. Its 5.10 GHz boost clock and 2.20 GHz base clock exceed the Core 7 150UL's corresponding figures, delivering better single-thread responsiveness. The 24 MB L3 cache doubles the available shared cache, which improves performance for cache-sensitive applications such as database queries or compiled code. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes offers twice the lane count and a newer generation, enabling faster GPU communication and storage throughput.

The Core i5-14501TE also wins on ECC memory support, providing error-correcting capability that the Core 7 150UL lacks. This makes the Core i5-14501TE suitable for reliability-focused workloads where memory corruption is unacceptable. The Core 7 150UL counters with the Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, which carries more execution units than the UHD Graphics 770, suggesting stronger integrated graphics performance for light gaming or media tasks without a discrete GPU.

The Verdict

The data indicates two distinct usage profiles with minimal overlap. The Intel Core 7 150UL, with its 10 cores and 15 W TDP, suits environments where power consumption and thermal output are the primary constraints. Its lower clock speeds and smaller L3 cache will limit peak performance, but the extra cores and higher-efficiency graphics engine make it acceptable for general productivity, media consumption, and light parallel workloads in compact chassis.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE, with 6 cores, 45 W TDP, 24 MB L3 cache, and PCIe Gen 5 support, targets systems that need sustained performance and platform expansion. The higher base and boost clocks provide snappier single-threaded response. The doubled L3 cache and ECC memory support make it credible for workstation-class tasks, content creation, or small-scale server deployments where data integrity matters. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow high-end GPUs and NVMe drives to run at full bandwidth.

Benchmark results remain unavailable, so these conclusions rest entirely on specification analysis. The 50th percentile ranking for both CPUs suggests neither is a performance outlier in the broader database. Users prioritizing efficiency and core count should select the Core 7 150UL. Users prioritizing clock speed, cache, ECC, and PCIe bandwidth should select the Core i5-14501TE. The 45 W TDP of the Core i5-14501TE implies a need for adequate cooling, while the Core 7 150UL can operate in more passive or low-airflow environments. Both processors remain active in production status, and both share the Intel Socket 1700 platform, allowing potential system compatibility despite their different power and feature profiles.