Intel Core 7 150UL vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison
Intel Core 7 150UL
Core i5-14401TE
Analysis: Intel Core 7 150UL vs Intel Core i5-14401TE
The Verdict
The Intel Core 7 150UL and Intel Core i5-14401TE serve distinctly different desktop roles despite sharing the same Raptor Lake architecture and Socket 1700 platform. The Core 7 150UL is positioned for efficient, multi-threaded throughput in constrained thermal envelopes, while the Core i5-14401TE is built for sustained performance with a higher power allocation and larger cache pool.
The Core 7 150UL uses a 10-core, 12-thread configuration with a 15 W TDP, making it the clear choice for compact or passively cooled desktop systems where power draw is the primary constraint. Its 5.00 GHz boost clock gives it a single-core ceiling that exceeds the i5-14401TE's 4.50 GHz boost, which matters for lightly threaded responsiveness. The 150UL also integrates Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, a substantial upgrade over the i5-14401TE's UHD Graphics 730 for systems that rely on the integrated GPU.
The Core i5-14401TE counters with a higher 2.00 GHz base clock, a 45 W TDP, and a significantly larger 20 MB shared L3 cache versus 12 MB on the 150UL. For workloads that scale with cache capacity and sustained multi-core operation, the i5-14401TE has the structural advantage. It also supports ECC memory, which the 150UL does not, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes compared to Gen 4 with 8 lanes on the 150UL. The i5-14401TE is the better fit for systems that need server-grade memory integrity, high-bandwidth expansion, or PCIe 5.0 devices.
Neither processor holds a benchmark edge over the other in the recorded data, as both occupy the 50th percentile among all CPUs and have no head-to-head benchmark results. The decision rests entirely on the specification differences: efficiency and integrated graphics versus cache, ECC support, and PCIe capability.
Architecture Differences
Both processors are built on Intel's 10 nm process and share the Raptor Lake architecture family. The Core 7 150UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS codename, while the Core i5-14401TE uses Raptor Lake-R. The 150UL belongs to the Core 7 generation, and the i5-14401TE belongs to the Core 14th Gen (Raptor Lake Refresh). Both are fabricated by Intel.
The core configurations diverge sharply. The 150UL packs 10 cores and 12 threads, indicating a hybrid arrangement with performance and efficiency cores. The i5-14401TE uses 6 cores and 12 threads, which suggests all cores are capable of simultaneous multi-threading. This means the 150UL has more physical cores for parallel tasks but relies on its boost clock for single-thread speed, while the i5-14401TE has fewer cores but a higher base clock and larger cache per thread.
Cache organization differs in the shared L3 tier. The 150UL offers 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i5-14401TE offers 20 MB. Both use 80 KB L1 per core and 1.25 MB L2 per core, so the L3 gap is the defining cache difference. The larger L3 on the i5-14401TE benefits workloads that repeatedly access a working set larger than 12 MB, such as database queries or compiled code loops.
Memory support is identical in type: both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory buses. The i5-14401TE adds ECC memory support, a feature absent from the 150UL. ECC enables error correction for memory contents, which is critical for long-running compute jobs or file servers where silent data corruption is unacceptable.
PCIe capability differs by generation and lane count. The 150UL provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU, while the i5-14401TE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The i5-14401TE doubles the lane count and doubles the per-lane bandwidth, enabling faster NVMe storage and multi-GPU configurations. The 150UL's 8 Gen 4 lanes are sufficient for a single GPU and one or two NVMe drives but limit expansion options.
Integrated graphics differ substantially. The 150UL uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, a high-end integrated GPU capable of hardware-accelerated video encoding and lighter 3D workloads. The i5-14401TE uses UHD Graphics 730, a more modest integrated solution. For systems without a discrete GPU, the 150UL provides noticeably stronger display and media capabilities.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data contains no head-to-head benchmark results between the Core 7 150UL and the Core i5-14401TE. Both processors hold a 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs, meaning the database places them at the median of the performance distribution. With zero wins recorded for either processor and no benchmark scores available, the comparison must rely on architectural and specification analysis rather than measured performance deltas.
The absence of benchmark data does not invalidate the specification comparison. The 150UL's 5.00 GHz boost clock exceeds the i5-14401TE's 4.50 GHz boost, suggesting a single-thread advantage of roughly 11% at peak turbo frequency. The i5-14401TE's 2.00 GHz base clock exceeds the 150UL's 1.70 GHz base clock, indicating the i5-14401TE sustains higher minimum operating frequency under load. The 150UL's 15 W TDP versus the i5-14401TE's 45 W TDP means the 150UL will reach its boost ceiling more briefly before thermal or power limits constrain it, while the i5-14401TE can sustain higher frequencies for longer durations.
For multi-threaded workloads, the 150UL's 10 physical cores provide more parallel execution units than the i5-14401TE's 6 cores. However, the i5-14401TE's larger 20 MB L3 cache reduces memory stalls for data-intensive workloads, potentially offsetting the core count deficit. The 150UL's 12 threads match the i5-14401TE's 12 threads, but the 150UL achieves this with only 2 threads per efficiency core pair, while the i5-14401TE uses 2 threads per performance core.
Specification Differences
The following fields differ between the two processors:
- Cores: 10 (150UL) vs 6 (i5-14401TE)
- Threads: 12 (both, no difference)
- Base Clock: 1.70 GHz (150UL) vs 2.00 GHz (i5-14401TE)
- Boost Clock: 5.00 GHz (150UL) vs 4.50 GHz (i5-14401TE)
- TDP: 15 W (150UL) vs 45 W (i5-14401TE)
- Codename: Raptor Lake-PS (150UL) vs Raptor Lake-R (i5-14401TE)
- Generation: Core 7 (Raptor Lake-PS) vs Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
- Die Size: not specified (150UL) vs 215 mm² (i5-14401TE)
- L3 Cache: 12 MB shared (150UL) vs 20 MB shared (i5-14401TE)
- ECC Memory: false (150UL) vs true (i5-14401TE)
- PCIe: Gen 4, 8 Lanes (150UL) vs Gen 5, 16 Lanes (i5-14401TE)
- Integrated Graphics: Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (150UL) vs UHD Graphics 730 (i5-14401TE)
- Release Date: April 2024 (150UL) vs June 2024 (i5-14401TE)
- Part Number: unknown (150UL) vs Q4T4SRNJP (i5-14401TE)
The socket, process node, foundry, L1 and L2 cache sizes, memory type support, memory bus width, market segment, production status, and unlocked multiplier status are identical between the two.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core 7 150UL reaches 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE reaches 4.50 GHz.
Q: Does the Core i5-14401TE support ECC memory?
A: Yes, ECC memory support is listed as true for the i5-14401TE. The Core 7 150UL does not support ECC memory.
Q: What PCIe generation and lane count does each processor provide?
A: The Core 7 150UL provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes. The Core i5-14401TE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.
Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?
A: The Core 7 150UL has 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i5-14401TE has 20 MB of shared L3 cache.
Q: Which processor has more physical cores?
A: The Core 7 150UL has 10 cores, while the Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores. Both have 12 threads.
Q: What are the TDP ratings for these two processors?
A: The Core 7 150UL has a 15 W TDP. The Core i5-14401TE has a 45 W TDP.
Where Each One Wins
The Core 7 150UL wins in scenarios that prioritize low power consumption. Its 15 W TDP is one-third of the i5-14401TE's 45 W TDP, making it suitable for small form factor desktops, fanless builds, or systems with limited cooling. The 10-core configuration provides ample parallel throughput for productivity workloads while the 5.00 GHz boost clock handles bursty single-thread tasks. The Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units gives the 150UL a decisive advantage for media playback, video transcoding, and light GPU-accelerated applications without a discrete graphics card.
The Core i5-14401TE wins in scenarios that demand sustained performance and expandability. The 45 W TDP allows the processor to maintain higher operating frequencies under continuous load, which benefits rendering, compilation, and simulation workloads. The 20 MB L3 cache improves performance for data sets that exceed 12 MB, reducing memory traffic and latency. ECC memory support makes the i5-14401TE suitable for workstations or small servers where memory integrity is non-negotiable. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes enables faster storage devices and more flexible GPU configurations.
For users with an existing Socket 1700 motherboard, both processors fit the same socket. The choice depends on whether the system prioritizes low power and integrated graphics (150UL) or cache capacity, ECC support, and PCIe bandwidth (i5-14401TE). The 150UL's 5.00 GHz boost clock gives it the higher peak single-core speed, while the i5-14401TE's 2.00 GHz base clock ensures more consistent performance at moderate loads. The 150UL released in April 2024, two months before the i5-14401TE's June 2024 release, so the 150UL has slightly longer market availability. Neither processor is multiplier unlocked, so overclocking is not a differentiator.