Intel Core 7 150U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a one-sided comparison for this pairing. The Intel Core 7 150U has a complete benchmark suite, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has no recorded benchmark scores across any of the standard tests in the database. Consequently, all head-to-head wins belong to the Intel part by default, as there are no scores for the Qualcomm processor to contest any of the results.

The Intel Core 7 150U posts a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8883 and a single-core score of 1875.5. In Geekbench, it records 6234 multicore and 1857 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 14700 and a single-thread score of 3508. The absence of any Qualcomm scores means the database cannot compute relative performance deltas between the two processors at this time. The Intel part also carries an average benchmark score of 17395, whereas the Qualcomm part holds an average score of 0 in the database, reflecting the lack of test data.

The Intel chip's percentile ranking among all CPUs stands at 71, placing it in the upper third of all recorded processors. The Qualcomm chip's percentile is 50, though this figure is based on no benchmark entries. The Intel processor's nearest rivals in the database are all AMD parts, including the Ryzen 5 4500, which has an average score of 17333 and a delta of 0.4 percent relative to the Intel chip, and the Ryzen 5 4600G, which scores 17507 and sits 0.6 percent higher. These comparisons show the Intel Core 7 150U is competitive with established desktop-class AMD processors from the Ryzen 4000 series, coming within a fraction of a percent in average benchmark performance.

The head-to-head benchmark table between these two specific processors is empty, and the win counters show zero for each side. This means the database has no direct matchup data to draw from, so the only meaningful analytical path is to compare the Intel chip's numbers against its nearest rivals and to note the absence of Qualcomm data as a significant limitation for any buyer seeking direct performance validation.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply in almost every architectural pillar. Intel uses a 10-node process fabricated at Intel, while Qualcomm uses a 4 nm process fabricated at TSMC. The process node difference is substantial, with the Qualcomm part built on a much smaller process, which typically implies higher transistor density and efficiency, though the recorded data does not include transistor counts or die sizes for either chip.

The core configuration differs as well. The Intel Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads, indicating a hybrid layout with performance and efficiency cores. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads, a fully symmetric arrangement with no simultaneous multithreading. The Intel chip's boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz, while the Qualcomm chip's boost clock is not recorded in the database. The Qualcomm base clock is 3.40 GHz, and the Intel base clock is 1.80 GHz, so the Qualcomm part starts at a much higher frequency, though the Intel part has a large boost ceiling.

Cache hierarchies are also structured differently. Intel provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. Qualcomm provides 288 KB of L1 per core, 12 MB of L2 per module, and only 6 MB of shared L3. The Qualcomm L2 allocation per module is massive compared to the Intel per-core L2, and the L1 per core is also much larger. The Intel L3 is double the Qualcomm L3, but the Qualcomm design places more cache closer to the cores. The Intel TDP is 15 watts, while the Qualcomm TDP is 35 watts, a significant difference in power envelope that will affect sustained performance in thin-and-light chassis.

Memory support also differs. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. Qualcomm supports only LPDDR5X, also dual-channel, but with a recorded memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. The Intel memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. The Intel chip uses an Intel BGA 1744 socket, while the Qualcomm chip uses a Qualcomm BGA 2073 socket, so they are not interchangeable in any system design. PCIe connectivity favors Qualcomm with 12 lanes of Gen 4, while Intel provides 8 lanes of Gen 4. Integrated graphics are also distinct: Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, and Qualcomm uses the Adreno X1-85.

The Intel part is based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-U, and was released on January 7, 2024. The Qualcomm part uses the Oryon codename under the Snapdragon X Elite generation and was released on April 23, 2024. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP in the database. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported on either. The Intel part number is SRMYP, and the Qualcomm part number is X1E78100. Both are listed as Active in production status and target the mobile market segment.

The Verdict

From the recorded data alone, the Intel Core 7 150U is the only processor with measurable performance. It delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8883 and a single-core score of 1875.5, which are strong numbers for a 15-watt mobile part. Its Geekbench scores of 6234 multicore and 1857 single-core reinforce a capable all-round showing. The PassMark multithread score of 14700 and single-thread score of 3508 place it in a competitive position relative to its nearest rivals, all AMD desktop and mobile parts from the Ryzen 4000 and 5000 families. The average benchmark score of 17395 sits within 0.6 percent of the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and within 0.4 percent of the Ryzen 5 4500, which indicates the Intel chip is performing at a level comparable to those processors.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 cannot be assessed for performance because the database contains no benchmark scores for it. Its percentile of 50 and average score of 0 are artifacts of the missing data rather than evidence of poor performance. A buyer considering this processor would have no recorded performance metrics to evaluate. The chip's architectural attributes, such as a 4 nm process, 12 Oryon cores, 135.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 12 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, suggest a modern design, but the database does not support any claims about its actual benchmark behavior.

For a user who prioritizes verified performance data, the Intel Core 7 150U is the defensible choice. It has a full suite of recorded scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark. For a user considering the Qualcomm part, the data is silent, and any decision would rest on unverified assumptions. Strictly from the database, the Intel processor is the only one with demonstrable results.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core 7 150U Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U records a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8883.

Q: Does the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has no recorded benchmark scores in any test category.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What are the process nodes for the two chips?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U has a TDP of 15 watts. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has a TDP of 35 watts.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has a base clock of 3.40 GHz, while the Intel Core 7 150U has a base clock of 1.80 GHz. The Intel chip's boost clock is 5.40 GHz, and the Qualcomm boost clock is not recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 150U wins in every category where data exists. It has a complete benchmark record, covering Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, Geekbench, and nine PassMark subtests. The scores are consistent and place the chip at the 71st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, all AMD parts, show the Intel chip within 0.6 percent of the Ryzen 5 4600G and within 0.4 percent of the Ryzen 5 4500. The Intel chip also wins on boost clock, with a recorded 5.40 GHz maximum, and on L3 cache capacity, with 12 MB shared versus 6 MB shared on the Qualcomm part. The 15-watt TDP gives Intel an efficiency advantage in the power envelope, which matters for thinner mobile designs.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 wins on architectural specifications where the database has entries. It has a smaller 4 nm process node from TSMC, which is a fabrication advantage over Intel's 10 nm node. It has 12 cores versus 10, and its base clock of 3.40 GHz is nearly double the Intel base clock of 1.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy favors Qualcomm at the L1 and L2 levels, with 288 KB of L1 per core and 12 MB of L2 per module, compared to Intel's 80 KB L1 per core and 1.25 MB L2 per core. Memory bandwidth is recorded at 135.2 GB/s for Qualcomm, a figure absent for Intel. The Qualcomm chip also provides 12 PCIe Gen 4 lanes versus 8 on Intel. The 35-watt TDP suggests a higher power ceiling for sustained heavy workloads, though no benchmark data confirms this behavior.

The use-case split is therefore asymmetric. For any task requiring verified performance, the Intel Core 7 150U is the only option with support in the data. For a design that prioritizes process efficiency, core count, memory bandwidth, or PCIe lane availability, the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has the architectural edge on paper, but the absence of benchmark scores leaves its real-world behavior unquantified. The database records a 50th percentile ranking for Qualcomm, but this is not derived from any test scores and should not be read as a performance estimate.