Intel Core 7 150U vs Intel Core Ultra X7 368H Comparison
Intel Core 7 150U
Core Ultra X7 368H
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 7 150U vs Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The benchmark data is unambiguous. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H wins all 17 head-to-head comparisons. The largest single-core gap appears in Cinebench R20 single-core, where the Ultra X7 scores 1673 against the Core 7 150U's 740, a 55.8% advantage. Cinebench R23 single-core shows a smaller but still substantial lead, with the Ultra X7 at 3984 versus 1875.5, a 52.9% edge. PassMark single-thread is the closest contest in the entire set: the Ultra X7 scores 4005, only 12.4% ahead of the Core 7 150U's 3508.
Multi-core results widen the margin considerably. Cinebench R23 multi-core is the standout: the Ultra X7 delivers 28221, which is 68.5% higher than the Core 7 150U's 8883. Cinebench R20 multi-core follows a similar pattern, with the Ultra X7 at 11852 versus 5248, a 55.7% difference. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows the Ultra X7 at 2844 against 1505.5, a 47.1% lead. In PassMark multi-thread, the Ultra X7 scores 32956 versus 14700, a 55.4% advantage.
Specialized workloads reinforce the pattern. PassMark find prime numbers shows the most extreme delta: the Ultra X7 scores 321, which is 81.9% higher than the Core 7 150U's 58. PassMark floating point math has the Ultra X7 at 105681 versus 34405, a 67.4% gap. PassMark extended instructions shows 25669 against 8748, a 65.9% difference. PassMark physics shows 2857 versus 1012, a 64.6% lead. PassMark data encryption has the Ultra X7 at 25228 versus 10025, a 60.3% edge. PassMark random string sorting shows 38093 against 18269, a 52% gap. PassMark data compression has the Ultra X7 at 312927 versus 158622, a 49.3% advantage. The smallest multi-core gap is PassMark integer math, where the Ultra X7 scores 88083 against 51057, a 42% lead.
The average benchmark score for the Ultra X7 is 40518, placing it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs. The Core 7 150U averages 17395, which lands at the 71st percentile. That 16-point percentile gap reflects the consistent spread across nearly every workload.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H wins every recorded workload category. There is no benchmark in the database where the Intel Core 7 150U takes the lead. The closest margin is PassMark single-thread, where the Ultra X7 leads by 12.4%. The largest margin is PassMark find prime numbers, where it leads by 81.9%.
The Ultra X7's biggest advantages cluster in floating-point math, extended instruction workloads, and prime number calculations. These results indicate strong throughput for scientific computing, encryption, compression, and other math-heavy tasks. The data compression score of 312927 against 158622 shows particularly strong performance for archival and data-heavy operations. The data encryption score of 25228 against 10025 points to solid cryptographic workload capability.
The Core 7 150U's strongest relative showing is in single-threaded PassMark tests, where its 3508 score keeps it within 12.4% of the Ultra X7. That suggests the Core 7 150U has respectable per-core efficiency, but the Ultra X7's higher score still takes the win. In Cinebench single-core tests, the gap is larger: 36.7% in R15 and 52.9% in R23. The PassMark single-thread test is the only benchmark where the Core 7 150U comes close to matching its rival.
For users running lightly threaded applications that depend on PassMark-style single-thread performance, the Core 7 150U is not far behind. For anything involving multiple cores, heavy math, encryption, compression, or physics simulation, the Ultra X7 pulls ahead by margins ranging from 42% to 81.9%. The data shows no use case where the Core 7 150U wins outright.
The Verdict
The database is clear. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is the stronger processor in every measured benchmark. It holds the 87th percentile overall, while the Core 7 150U sits at the 71st percentile. Its average benchmark score of 40518 is more than double the Core 7 150U's 17395.
The Intel Core 7 150U is best suited for scenarios where its 15W TDP and smaller footprint matter more than raw performance. Its single-thread PassMark score of 3508 is respectable, and its 10-core, 12-thread configuration handles light multi-threaded work. But the recorded data shows no performance category where it beats the Ultra X7.
The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is the pick for anyone prioritizing compute throughput. Its 16-core, 16-thread layout, 18 MB of shared L3 cache, and 3 nm process node deliver across-the-board advantages. The benchmark results indicate it handles everything from compression to floating-point math to prime number calculations with decisive margins. The 12.4% single-thread PassMark gap is its narrowest win, so even single-core tasks favor it.
Choose the Core 7 150U for a low-power mobile design where the 15W TDP is the priority. Choose the Core Ultra X7 368H for performance, since it wins 17 of 17 recorded benchmarks and sits 16 percentile points higher in the overall CPU ranking.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has the higher PassMark single-thread score?
A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 4005, which is 12.4% higher than the Intel Core 7 150U's 3508.
Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap in Cinebench R23?
A: The Core Ultra X7 368H scores 28221, while the Core 7 150U scores 8883. That is a 68.5% advantage for the Ultra X7.
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Core Ultra X7 368H has 16 cores and 16 threads. The Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads.
Q: What is the difference in overall CPU percentile ranking?
A: The Core Ultra X7 368H is at the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 7 150U is at the 71st percentile.
Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?
A: The Core 7 150U has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The Core Ultra X7 368H has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.
Q: How do the processors compare in PassMark integer math?
A: The Core Ultra X7 368H scores 88083, which is 42% higher than the Core 7 150U's 51057.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different architectural generations and process nodes. The Intel Core 7 150U uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process, with the Raptor Lake-U codename. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H uses Panther Lake architecture on a 3 nm process, with the Panther Lake-H codename. Both are manufactured by Intel, but the process node difference is substantial.
Core counts differ significantly. The Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads. The Core Ultra X7 368H has 16 cores and 16 threads. Cache layouts also differ. The Core 7 150U has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra X7 368H has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. Each cache level is larger on the Ultra X7.
The Core 7 150U uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, while the Core Ultra X7 368H uses Intel BGA 2540. The Core 7 150U supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The Core Ultra X7 368H supports LPDDR5X memory in dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 153.6 GB/s. The Core 7 150U has no recorded memory bandwidth figure in the database.
PCIe capabilities differ. The Core 7 150U uses PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The Core Ultra X7 368H uses PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: the Core 7 150U uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while the Core Ultra X7 368H uses Arc B390.
Specification Differences
The base clocks differ. The Core 7 150U runs at 1.80 GHz, while the Core Ultra X7 368H runs at 2.00 GHz. The boost clocks are reversed: the Core 7 150U boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the Core Ultra X7 368H boosts to 5.00 GHz. Thermal design power differs as well. The Core 7 150U has a 15W TDP, while the Core Ultra X7 368H has a 25W TDP.
Memory support is another differentiator. The Core 7 150U supports DDR4 and DDR5. The Core Ultra X7 368H supports LPDDR5X only. The Core Ultra X7 368H has a recorded memory bandwidth of 153.6 GB/s, while the Core 7 150U has none listed. Neither processor supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.
The Core 7 150U belongs to the Core 7 (Raptor Lake-U) generation, while the Core Ultra X7 368H belongs to the Ultra X7 (Panther Lake-H) generation. The Core Ultra X7 368H is part of the Core Ultra Series 3 family. The Core 7 150U has no series designation. The Core 7 150U's part number is SRMYP, while the Core Ultra X7 368H's part number is SA4R7Q9EJ. Both are active production parts for the mobile market segment.
The release dates differ: the Core 7 150U launched on 2024-01-07, while the Core Ultra X7 368H launched on 2026-01-04. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP in the database.