Intel Core 7 150U vs Intel Core i9-14901E Comparison
Intel Core 7 150U
Core i9-14901E
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 7 150U vs Intel Core i9-14901E
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The benchmark comparison between the Intel Core 7 150U and the Intel Core i9-14901E is one-sided. The i9-14901E wins all 17 recorded head-to-head tests. The largest gap appears in Cinebench R23 multicore, where the i9-14901E scores 25753 against the 150U's 8883, a 65.5% deficit for the mobile chip. The smallest margin is in PassMark single-thread tests, where the i9-14901E leads by 19.4% with 4354 versus 3508.
The Cinebench R15 multicore results show the i9-14901E at 2595 versus 1505.5 for the 150U, a 42% advantage. Cinebench R20 multicore repeats the pattern: 10816 against 5248, another 51.5% gap. The single-core Cinebench R20 test also shows a 51.5% difference, with the i9-14901E scoring 1526 against 740. Cinebench R23 single-core gives the i9-14901E a 48.4% edge, 3635 versus 1875.5.
PassMark workloads confirm the trend. The i9-14901E delivers 288777 in data compression versus 158622 for the 150U, a 45.1% lead. Data encryption shows a 46% gap, 18571 against 10025. Extended instructions score 17249 for the i9-14901E versus 8748, a 49.3% difference. Find prime numbers is the most lopsided PassMark test: 189 versus 58, a 69.3% deficit. Floating point math sees 81089 against 34405, a 57.6% gap. Integer math shows 112736 versus 51057, a 54.7% difference. Multithread scores are 30298 versus 14700, a 51.5% gap. Physics tests give the i9-14901E a 66.7% advantage, 3041 versus 1012. Random string sorting shows 39138 against 18269, a 53.3% lead.
The average benchmark scores reflect the overall split. The i9-14901E averages 37911 across all tests, while the 150U averages 17395. The i9-14901E sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, compared to the 71st percentile for the 150U.
Nearest rival data places the 150U alongside desktop AMD parts. The AMD Ryzen 5 4500 averages 17333, a 0.4% difference from the 150U. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 averages 17321, also 0.4% away. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE scores 17482, 0.5% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G averages 17507, 0.6% higher. The i9-14901E sits near the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, which averages 37904, essentially identical. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X averages 37943, 0.1% higher. The Intel Core 5 211E averages 37829, 0.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 averages 37804, 0.3% lower.
Architecture Differences
Both processors share the Raptor Lake architecture and the same 10 nm process node from Intel. The core configurations diverge significantly. The Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the Core i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads. The i9-14901E achieves higher throughput despite fewer physical cores because it enables Hyper-Threading on all cores, whereas the 150U's 10 cores only produce 12 threads, implying a hybrid arrangement where some cores lack simultaneous multithreading.
The cache hierarchy differs in capacity. Both chips have 80 KB of L1 per core. The L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core on the 150U versus 2 MB per core on the i9-14901E. The L3 cache is 12 MB shared on the 150U versus 36 MB shared on the i9-14901E, a threefold difference in the final cache level.
Clock speeds show the i9-14901E with a higher base clock of 2.80 GHz versus 1.80 GHz for the 150U. The boost clocks are closer: 5.60 GHz on the i9-14901E versus 5.40 GHz on the 150U. The thermal design power differs substantially, with the 150U rated at 15 watts and the i9-14901E at 65 watts, reflecting the mobile versus desktop positioning.
The sockets are incompatible. The 150U uses Intel BGA 1744, a soldered mobile package, while the i9-14901E uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop LGA socket. The die size is recorded for the i9-14901E at 257 mm², with no die size listed for the 150U.
Memory support is identical on paper: both support DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode. Neither has recorded memory bandwidth figures. The i9-14901E adds ECC memory support, which the 150U lacks. PCIe connectivity differs: the 150U provides Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes, while the i9-14901E provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.
Integrated graphics differ as well. The 150U uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while the i9-14901E uses UHD Graphics 770. The market segments are distinct: mobile for the 150U, desktop for the i9-14901E. Both are listed as active production parts. The release dates are close, with the 150U released on 2024-01-07 and the i9-14901E on 2024-06-30. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.
The Verdict
The data indicates a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core i9-14901E dominates every recorded benchmark, with margins ranging from 19.4% in single-thread PassMark tests to 69.3% in prime number computation. Mobile users who need the 150U's 15-watt thermal envelope will accept substantial performance reductions across all workloads.
The i9-14901E's 86th percentile ranking versus the 150U's 71st percentile shows the desktop part sits in a higher overall performance tier. The nearest rival comparisons reinforce this: the 150U competes with desktop AMD Ryzen 5-class parts from earlier generations, while the i9-14901E matches modern AMD Ryzen AI 9 and Ryzen 7 desktop processors.
For workloads requiring heavy multi-threaded throughput, the i9-14901E's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25753 versus 8883 makes the choice obvious. The 36 MB L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 provide the i9-14901E with a cache advantage that likely contributes to its PassMark wins in data compression, integer math, and physics simulations.
The 150U's advantages are not visible in the benchmark data. It wins zero tests. Its 10-core, 12-thread configuration with a 1.80 GHz base clock and 15-watt TDP targets efficiency and portability, not peak performance. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units offers more graphics muscle than the UHD Graphics 770, but no graphics benchmarks appear in the recorded data.
The i9-14901E also brings ECC memory support, Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes, and a higher 5.60 GHz boost clock. These features, combined with the benchmark sweep, position it as the superior processor for compute-intensive desktop tasks. The 150U remains the choice for mobile platforms where power consumption and BGA packaging are requirements.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores?
A: The Intel Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads. The i9-14901E produces more threads despite fewer cores.
Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?
A: The largest gap is in PassMark find prime numbers, where the i9-14901E scores 189 against 58 for the 150U, a 69.3% deficit.
Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?
A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode. The i9-14901E additionally supports ECC memory, which the 150U does not.
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, compared to 5.40 GHz for the Intel Core 7 150U.
Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?
A: The i9-14901E averages 37911 across all benchmarks, while the 150U averages 17395. The i9-14901E sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, the 150U at the 71st.
Q: Are these processors compatible with the same motherboard socket?
A: No. The 150U uses Intel BGA 1744, a mobile soldered package. The i9-14901E uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core i9-14901E wins in every recorded category. The benchmark sweep includes Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both single-core and multicore variants, plus 11 PassMark workloads. No test in the database favors the Core 7 150U.
The i9-14901E shows particular strength in multi-threaded rendering workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25753 is nearly three times the 150U's 8883. This suggests the i9-14901E handles CPU rendering, video encoding, and similar parallel workloads with far greater efficiency.
PassMark physics and prime number tests show the widest gaps at 66.7% and 69.3% respectively. These workloads often benefit from large caches and high sustained clock speeds. The i9-14901E's 36 MB L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 provide the resources these tests require.
Single-thread performance favors the i9-14901E by smaller margins. PassMark single-thread shows 4354 versus 3508, a 19.4% gap. Cinebench R15 single-core shows 366 versus 254, a 30.6% gap. This indicates the i9-14901E's 5.60 GHz boost clock delivers meaningful advantages even in lightly threaded tasks.
The 150U's niche is not captured in benchmark wins. Its 15-watt TDP, BGA 1744 socket, and mobile market segment define its purpose. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units may offer better integrated graphics performance, though no graphics tests appear in the data.
For desktop users building systems with Socket 1700 motherboards, the i9-14901E provides superior performance in all measured categories. For mobile devices requiring low power consumption and soldered processors, the 150U is the only option between the two, given the desktop-only socket of the i9-14901E.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The core counts differ: 10 cores and 12 threads for the 150U versus 8 cores and 16 threads for the i9-14901E. Base clocks differ by 1.00 GHz, with the i9-14901E at 2.80 GHz and the 150U at 1.80 GHz. Boost clocks differ by 0.20 GHz, with 5.60 GHz on the i9-14901E and 5.40 GHz on the 150U.
Thermal design power differs by 50 watts: 65 watts for the i9-14901E versus 15 watts for the 150U. The sockets are entirely different: Intel Socket 1700 for the desktop part, Intel BGA 1744 for the mobile part. The codenames differ at the suffix level, with Raptor Lake-U for the 150U and Raptor Lake-R for the i9-14901E.
The L2 cache differs from 1.25 MB per core on the 150U to 2 MB per core on the i9-14901E. The L3 cache differs from 12 MB shared to 36 MB shared. The die size is recorded only for the i9-14901E at 257 mm². ECC memory support is present on the i9-14901E and absent on the 150U.
PCIe capability differs: Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes on the 150U versus Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes on the i9-14901E. The integrated graphics units differ: Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on the 150U versus UHD Graphics 770 on the i9-14901E. Market segments differ: mobile versus desktop. Release dates differ by approximately six months, with the 150U launching first on 2024-01-07 and the i9-14901E on 2024-06-30. Part numbers also differ: SRMYP for the 150U, Q49ESRNJH for the i9-14901E. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.