Intel Core 7 150U vs Intel Core 9 273PTE Comparison

Intel Core 7 150U and Intel Core 9 273PTE occupy different tiers of Intel’s mobile and desktop lineup, respectively. The recorded data shows a clear performance hierarchy, with the Core 9 273PTE dominating multi-threaded and most single-threaded workloads, while the Core 7 150U secures a narrow victory in one specific single-threaded test. The following analysis breaks down the benchmark results, architectural differences, and the practical implications of each processor’s strengths.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PTE wins 15 of the 17 recorded head-to-head benchmarks. Its advantages are most pronounced in multi-core workloads, where the gap widens substantially. The largest margin appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core, with the Core 9 273PTE scoring 20445 against the Core 7 150U’s 8883, a delta of -56.6% from the Core 7’s perspective. This translates to the Core 9 delivering more than double the multi-threaded rendering performance.

The Core 9 273PTE also leads decisively in PassMark’s find prime numbers test, scoring 142 versus 58, a 59.2% difference. Physics simulation shows a similar pattern, with the Core 9 at 1917 versus 1012, a 47.2% lead. These results indicate the Core 9 is the stronger choice for CPU-intensive parallel tasks such as rendering, scientific computing, and heavy multitasking.

The Intel Core 7 150U wins only two benchmarks, both being the PassMark single-threaded test (listed twice under slightly different names). Its score of 3508 edges out the Core 9’s 3433, a 2.2% advantage. This is a modest win, suggesting the Core 7’s higher base clock of 1.80 GHz versus 1.40 GHz helps in lightly threaded, latency-sensitive workloads, though the Core 9’s higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz versus 5.40 GHz nearly closes the gap.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectures and target different market segments. The Intel Core 7 150U is based on Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-U variant, and is designed for mobile platforms. It uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket and has a thermal design power of 15 watts. The Core 9 273PTE, in contrast, uses the Bartlett Lake architecture, runs on the Intel Socket 1700, and has a 45 watt TDP. This higher power envelope is a major factor in the Core 9’s performance advantage.

Core and thread counts differ significantly. The Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Core 9’s thread count is double its core count, indicating support for simultaneous multithreading across all cores, whereas the Core 7’s 12 threads from 10 cores implies a hybrid configuration with some efficiency cores lacking SMT.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. Both processors share an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, but the L2 cache differs: the Core 7 has 1.25 MB per core, while the Core 9 has 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is a more substantial difference, with the Core 7 offering 12 MB shared versus the Core 9’s 36 MB shared. This triple-sized L3 cache likely contributes to the Core 9’s superior performance in workloads that fit within cache.

Memory support is similar, with both supporting DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configurations. However, the Core 9 has a specified memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core 7’s bandwidth is not recorded in the database. ECC memory support is present on the Core 9 but absent on the Core 7. PCIe capabilities differ as well: the Core 7 uses Gen 4 with 8 lanes, while the Core 9 uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes, offering twice the lane count and a newer generation.

Integrated graphics also differ. The Core 7 150U features Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while the Core 9 273PTE uses UHD Graphics 730. The Core 7’s integrated GPU is positioned for better graphics performance in a mobile context, though the database does not include graphics-specific benchmark scores.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite shows the Core 9 273PTE’s dominance scaling with workload intensity. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Core 9 scores 2060 against 1505.5, a 26.9% lead. The R20 multi-core test doubles the gap, with the Core 9 at 8586 versus 5248, a 38.9% difference. The R23 multi-core test shows the largest margin at 20445 versus 8883, a 56.6% lead. This trend indicates the Core 9’s advantage grows as the benchmark becomes more demanding and better utilizes its 24 threads.

Single-core Cinebench results also favor the Core 9, but by smaller margins. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Core 9 scores 290 versus 254, a 12.4% lead. Cinebench R20 single-core shows 1212 versus 740, a 38.9% lead. Cinebench R23 single-core shows 2886 versus 1875.5, a 35% lead. These results are interesting because the Core 7 has a higher base clock, yet the Core 9’s higher boost clock and newer architecture deliver better single-threaded Cinebench performance.

PassMark tests show consistent Core 9 wins across almost all categories. Data compression: 258704 versus 158622, a 38.7% lead. Data encryption: 14253 versus 10025, a 29.7% lead. Extended instructions: 15952 versus 8748, a 45.2% lead. Floating point math: 60673 versus 34405, a 43.3% lead. Integer math: 82411 versus 51057, a 38% lead. Multithread: 24054 versus 14700, a 38.9% lead. Random string sorting: 28973 versus 18269, a 36.9% lead. The Core 9’s wins range from 29.7% to 59.2%, with the largest advantage in prime number finding.

The only exception is PassMark single-thread, where the Core 7 scores 3508 and the Core 9 scores 3433. This 2.2% margin is small but consistent across both recorded entries for that test. It suggests that in certain single-threaded scenarios, the Core 7’s architecture or clock behavior gives it a slight edge, though the overall picture favors the Core 9.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the performance difference in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Core 9 273PTE scores 20445, while the Core 7 150U scores 8883. The Core 9 leads by 56.6%.

Q: Does the Core 7 150U win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the Core 7 150U wins the PassMark single-threaded test with a score of 3508, compared to the Core 9’s 3433, a 2.2% advantage.

Q: What are the TDP differences between the two?

A: The Core 7 150U has a TDP of 15 watts, while the Core 9 273PTE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 7 150U does not.

Q: How do the L3 cache sizes compare?

A: The Core 7 150U has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core 9 273PTE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

The Verdict

The benchmark data presents a clear separation of roles. The Intel Core 9 273PTE is the superior processor for multi-threaded and most single-threaded workloads, with margins ranging from 12.4% to 59.2% across the Cinebench and PassMark suites. Its 12 cores, 24 threads, 36 MB of L3 cache, and 45 watt TDP enable it to outperform the Core 7 150U in rendering, compression, encryption, physics simulation, and math-heavy tasks. It also adds ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, making it suitable for desktop systems requiring reliability and expansion.

The Intel Core 7 150U is designed for mobile use with a 15 watt TDP and the BGA 1744 socket. Its only benchmark win is a 2.2% margin in PassMark single-thread, which is a narrow edge in a single test. Its integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units may offer better built-in graphics capability than the Core 9’s UHD Graphics 730, but the database records no graphics benchmarks to confirm this. The Core 7’s lower power consumption and mobile socket make it appropriate for laptops and compact systems, while the Core 9’s performance data indicates it is the choice for desktop workloads that prioritize throughput. The recorded percentile ranks reinforce this: the Core 9 sits at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 7 sits at the 71st.