Intel Core 7 150HL vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core 7 150HL and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock speed?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has a base clock of 3.40 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core 7 150HL's base clock of 2.40 GHz.

Q: What is the boost clock speed for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 does not have a recorded boost clock.

Q: How do the cache hierarchies compare between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, an L2 cache of 2 MB per core, and a shared L3 cache of 24 MB. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has an L1 cache of 288 KB per core, an L2 cache of 12 MB per module, and a shared L3 cache of 6 MB.

Q: What type of memory does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 supports LPDDR5X memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has a memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. The Intel Core 7 150HL does not have a recorded memory bandwidth.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 7 150HL is built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS codename. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process node by Intel. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 and is classified as a desktop segment part. Its core layout consists of 14 cores and 20 threads, indicating a hybrid arrangement of performance and efficiency cores. The cache design includes an 80 KB L1 per core, a 2 MB L2 per core, and a 24 MB shared L3 cache.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 uses the Oryon codename and belongs to the Snapdragon X (Elite) generation. It is built on a 4 nm process node by TSMC. This processor is designed for the mobile segment and uses the Qualcomm BGA 2073 socket. It has 12 cores and 12 threads, which is a lower thread count than the Intel part. The cache structure is different: 288 KB L1 per core, 12 MB L2 per module, and a 6 MB shared L3 cache.

The process node difference is substantial, with the Qualcomm part using a smaller 4 nm node compared to Intel's 10 nm. This typically indicates a denser transistor layout and potentially better power efficiency. The Intel part has a higher TDP at 45 W, while the Qualcomm part is rated at 35 W. The Intel processor includes Iris Xe Graphics 96EU as integrated graphics, while the Qualcomm processor uses Adreno X1-85.

Memory support differs notably. The Intel Core 7 150HL supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 supports LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration and has a recorded memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. PCIe support also varies: the Intel part has Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the Qualcomm part has Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only).

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data for both processors shows no specific head-to-head benchmark scores in the database. The wins for each processor are both recorded as zero. The benchmark score average for both the Intel Core 7 150HL and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 is zero, and their percentile versus all CPUs is 50 for each.

Without direct benchmark scores, the comparison relies on architectural and specification differences. The Intel Core 7 150HL has a higher thread count of 20 versus 12, which suggests better multi-threaded workload handling in scenarios that scale with thread count. Its boost clock of 5.00 GHz is significantly higher than the Qualcomm part's base clock of 3.40 GHz, and the Qualcomm part has no recorded boost clock, giving the Intel processor an advantage in single-threaded frequency-driven workloads.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has a higher base clock at 3.40 GHz, which may give it an edge in sustained base-frequency operations. Its L1 cache per core is larger at 288 KB versus 80 KB, and its L2 cache per module is 12 MB versus 2 MB per core on the Intel part. The L3 cache is smaller on the Qualcomm part at 6 MB versus 24 MB on the Intel part.

The memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s on the Qualcomm processor is a concrete advantage for memory-intensive tasks, while the Intel processor has no recorded memory bandwidth figure. The process node advantage for the Qualcomm part (4 nm versus 10 nm) suggests lower power consumption per unit of performance, though the TDP difference is 35 W versus 45 W.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specification fields. The Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 2.40 GHz for Intel and 3.40 GHz for Qualcomm. The Intel part has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Qualcomm part has no boost clock recorded.

TDP differs: 45 W for Intel and 35 W for Qualcomm. Sockets are different: Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel part and Qualcomm BGA 2073 for the Qualcomm part. The architecture is Raptor Lake for Intel, while the Qualcomm part has no recorded architecture name but uses the Oryon codename. Process nodes are 10 nm (Intel) and 4 nm (TSMC for Qualcomm).

Cache sizes differ in all levels. L1 is 80 KB per core for Intel versus 288 KB per core for Qualcomm. L2 is 2 MB per core for Intel versus 12 MB per module for Qualcomm. L3 is 24 MB shared for Intel versus 6 MB shared for Qualcomm.

Memory support differs: DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel, LPDDR5X for Qualcomm. Memory bandwidth is not recorded for Intel, but is 135.2 GB/s for Qualcomm. PCIe lanes differ: 8 lanes for Intel versus 12 lanes for Qualcomm, both Gen 4. Integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics 96EU for Intel and Adreno X1-85 for Qualcomm.

Market segments differ: Desktop for Intel and Mobile for Qualcomm. The release dates are close, with Intel on 2024-04-07 and Qualcomm on 2024-04-23. The Qualcomm part has a part number of X1E78100, while the Intel part number is unknown.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 150HL wins in scenarios that benefit from higher thread counts. With 20 threads versus 12, it is better positioned for parallel workloads such as video rendering, compilation, and multi-tasking environments where thread scaling is effective. The 5.00 GHz boost clock gives it a clear advantage in single-threaded and lightly threaded applications where frequency is the primary driver. The larger shared L3 cache of 24 MB may reduce latency for frequently accessed data across cores.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 wins in power-constrained environments. Its 35 W TDP is lower than the Intel part's 45 W, and its 4 nm process node indicates a more efficient manufacturing process. The higher base clock of 3.40 GHz suggests consistent performance without relying on boost states. The memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s is a significant advantage for workload that stream large amounts of data, such as certain data analytics or AI inference tasks. The larger L1 cache per core (288 KB) and L2 per module (12 MB) can improve performance for workloads with high locality.

The Qualcomm part is designed for the mobile segment, which implies integration into lower-power devices where thermal and battery constraints are critical. The Intel part is a desktop processor, which typically operates in environments with fewer power limitations and more robust cooling.

The Verdict

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core 7 150HL is the appropriate choice for users or systems that prioritize multi-threaded throughput and high-frequency single-thread performance. Its 20 threads and 5.00 GHz boost clock provide a strong combination for desktop workloads that require both parallel scaling and fast response times. The 24 MB shared L3 cache supports data-intensive multi-core operations.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-78-100 is the suitable option for mobile platforms where power efficiency is paramount. Its 35 W TDP, 4 nm process node, and 135.2 GB/s memory bandwidth make it a strong candidate for battery-powered devices. The higher base clock of 3.40 GHz ensures steady performance without reliance on boost mechanisms.

The benchmark database shows no direct performance scores for either processor, and both have a percentile versus all CPUs of 50. This indicates that neither part has established a measurable benchmark advantage over the other in the recorded data. The decision between the two should be based on the architectural and specification differences outlined above, with the Intel part suited for desktop compute-heavy tasks and the Qualcomm part suited for efficient mobile computing.