Intel Core 7 150HL vs Intel Core Ultra X7 358H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Core 7 150HL and the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H. However, the Ultra X7 358H has a full set of measured scores, and its percentile ranking among all CPUs places it well above the Core 7 150HL. The Core 7 150HL sits at the 50th percentile of all CPUs, while the Ultra X7 358H reaches the 87th percentile. That gap places the two processors in different performance tiers despite both being current Intel products.

The Ultra X7 358H delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18747 and a single-core score of 2080. In Cinebench R20, it records 12011 multi-core and 1695 single-core. Cinebench R15 results show 3027 multi-core and 301.5 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 33802, a single-thread score of 4124, and an average benchmark score of 40967 across all recorded tests.

The Core 7 150HL has no benchmark entries in the database, so no direct score comparison is possible. The nearest rivals to the Ultra X7 358H provide context for its standing. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 averages 41208, which is 0.6% higher than the Ultra X7 358H. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H averages 41215, also 0.6% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G averages 40718, which is 0.6% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H averages 41263, 0.7% higher. These margins are narrow, placing the Ultra X7 358H in a competitive cluster where small score differences separate processors.

The Core 7 150HL's lack of measured scores means the data cannot confirm its real-world performance against the Ultra X7 358H. The percentile difference suggests the Ultra X7 358H is the stronger performer in the database's aggregate ranking, but the absence of direct measurements for the Core 7 150HL limits the comparison to architectural and specification differences.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel design generations and target different market segments. The Core 7 150HL uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename and is built on a 10 nm process node. The Ultra X7 358H uses the Panther Lake codename with the Panther Lake-H generation and is built on a 3 nm process node. Both are fabricated by Intel, but the process technology difference is substantial.

The Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Ultra X7 358H has 16 cores and 16 threads. Thread counts differ notably: the Core 7 150HL has more threads than cores, indicating Hyper-Threading support, while the Ultra X7 358H has equal core and thread counts, indicating no simultaneous multithreading. The Core 7 150HL runs a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boosts to 5.00 GHz. The Ultra X7 358H runs a lower base clock of 1.90 GHz and boosts to 4.80 GHz.

Cache layouts differ significantly. The Core 7 150HL uses 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra X7 358H uses 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra X7 358H has more per-core cache at every level, but the Core 7 150HL has more total L3 cache.

Memory support diverges completely. The Core 7 150HL supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus. The Ultra X7 358H supports only LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 153.6 GB/s. The Core 7 150HL has no recorded memory bandwidth figure.

PCI Express capabilities differ by generation and lane count. The Core 7 150HL uses PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The Ultra X7 358H uses PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU. The Ultra X7 358H has a newer PCIe standard but fewer CPU lanes. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

The integrated graphics differ in branding and architecture. The Core 7 150HL uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The Ultra X7 358H uses Arc B390 graphics. No benchmark data is available for either integrated GPU in the database.

The Core 7 150HL is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. The Ultra X7 358H is a mobile processor on Intel BGA 2540. The power envelopes differ as well: the Core 7 150HL has a 45 W TDP, while the Ultra X7 358H has a 25 W TDP. The Ultra X7 358H achieves its higher performance percentile despite the lower power target.

The release dates place the two products in different timeframes. The Core 7 150HL launched in April 2024. The Ultra X7 358H launched in January 2026. Both are marked as Active in production status. The Ultra X7 358H has a part number of SA4RAQ9ET, while the Core 7 150HL's part number is listed as unknown. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H has 16 cores, while the Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores.

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has 20 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H has 16 threads. The Core 7 150HL has more threads than cores, while the Ultra X7 358H has an equal count.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL is built on a 10 nm process node, while the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H is built on a 3 nm process node. Both are fabricated by Intel.

Q: How does the cache compare?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus. The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H supports LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus with a recorded bandwidth of 153.6 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H boosts to 4.80 GHz.

Q: What are the market segments for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H is a mobile processor on Intel BGA 2540.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification field.

Core and thread counts: the Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Ultra X7 358H has 16 cores and 16 threads.

Clock speeds: the Core 7 150HL has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Ultra X7 358H has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Power: the Core 7 150HL has a TDP of 45 W. The Ultra X7 358H has a TDP of 25 W.

Socket and market segment: the Core 7 150HL uses Intel Socket 1700 and is a desktop part. The Ultra X7 358H uses Intel BGA 2540 and is a mobile part.

Architecture and process: the Core 7 150HL uses Raptor Lake on a 10 nm node. The Ultra X7 358H uses Panther Lake on a 3 nm node.

Cache: the Core 7 150HL has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. The Ultra X7 358H has 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3.

Memory: the Core 7 150HL supports DDR4 and DDR5. The Ultra X7 358H supports LPDDR5X with a bandwidth of 153.6 GB/s.

PCIe: the Core 7 150HL uses Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes. The Ultra X7 358H uses Gen 5 with 4 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics: the Core 7 150HL uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The Ultra X7 358H uses Arc B390.

Release date: the Core 7 150HL launched in April 2024. The Ultra X7 358H launched in January 2026.

Part number: the Core 7 150HL is listed as unknown. The Ultra X7 358H is SA4RAQ9ET.

Both processors are Active in production, have no recorded launch MSRP, have locked multipliers, and lack ECC memory support. The Ultra X7 358H has a recorded memory bandwidth figure; the Core 7 150HL does not.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H is the higher-performing processor in the database's aggregate ranking. It sits at the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 7 150HL sits at the 50th percentile. The Ultra X7 358H has a recorded average benchmark score of 40967 and a full set of Cinebench and PassMark results. The Core 7 150HL has no benchmark scores recorded at all.

The Ultra X7 358H achieves this performance with a 25 W TDP, a 3 nm process node, and 16 cores. The Core 7 150HL uses a 45 W TDP, a 10 nm process node, and 14 cores. The Ultra X7 358H also has the newer integrated graphics, Arc B390, compared to Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on the Core 7 150HL. The Ultra X7 358H uses PCIe Gen 5, while the Core 7 150HL uses PCIe Gen 4.

The Core 7 150HL does hold advantages in specific specification areas. It has a higher boost clock at 5.00 GHz versus 4.80 GHz. It has more threads at 20 versus 16. It has more shared L3 cache at 24 MB versus 18 MB. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Ultra X7 358H only supports LPDDR5X. It also has more CPU PCIe lanes at 8 versus 4.

The Ultra X7 358H's nearest rivals cluster tightly around its average score. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is 0.6% higher, the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H is 0.6% higher, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G is 0.6% lower, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H is 0.7% higher. This indicates the Ultra X7 358H performs in line with other recent mid-range mobile processors from Intel and AMD.

For a desktop system using Socket 1700, the Core 7 150HL is the only compatible choice between the two. For a mobile system, the Ultra X7 358H is the only compatible choice. The Ultra X7 358H's performance data confirms it as the stronger processor in the database, but the Core 7 150HL cannot be directly benchmarked from the recorded measurements.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H wins on overall performance ranking. Its 87th percentile placement versus the Core 7 150HL's 50th percentile is the clearest performance indicator in the database. The Ultra X7 358H also wins on process efficiency, using a 3 nm node with a 25 W TDP. It wins on per-core cache, with 192 KB L1 and 3 MB L2 per core. It wins on memory bandwidth with a recorded 153.6 GB/s. It wins on PCIe generation with Gen 5 support. It wins on integrated graphics with Arc B390. It wins on core count with 16 cores versus 14. It is also the newer product, released in January 2026 versus April 2024.

The Intel Core 7 150HL wins on thread count with 20 threads versus 16. It wins on clock speed, with a 5.00 GHz boost clock versus 4.80 GHz. It wins on shared L3 cache with 24 MB versus 18 MB. It wins on memory flexibility with DDR4 and DDR5 support versus LPDDR5X only. It wins on PCIe lane count with 8 CPU lanes versus 4. It wins on socket compatibility for desktop builds using Socket 1700.

The Ultra X7 358H's measured Cinebench R23 scores of 18747 multi-core and 2080 single-core give it a demonstrated performance profile. The PassMark multithread score of 33802 and single-thread score of 4124 reinforce that profile. The Core 7 150HL has no equivalent data in the database, so its wins are limited to the specification sheet. The Ultra X7 358H's wins are backed by actual benchmark measurements, while the Core 7 150HL's wins are purely architectural.