Intel Core 7 150HL vs Intel Core Ultra 7 366H Comparison

Intel Core 7 150HL and Intel Core Ultra 7 366H represent two distinct approaches to modern processor design within Intel’s current lineup. The data shows a clear split between a 14-core, 20-thread desktop-oriented part built on a mature process, and a 16-core, 16-thread mobile-focused part using a newer node. Benchmark results indicate that the Core Ultra 7 366H generally holds the performance advantage, though the Core 7 150HL delivers specific strengths in frequency and compatibility.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains a full set of recorded results for the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, while the Intel Core 7 150HL has no benchmark entries available in the database. This makes a direct numerical comparison one-sided, but the available scores for the Core Ultra 7 366H still provide a detailed picture of its performance profile.

In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Core Ultra 7 366H scores 28,477 points. This result places it comfortably above many desktop processors from previous generations. The single-core score of 4,020 in the same test indicates strong per-thread performance, which is often a deciding factor in everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications.

Cinebench R20 results follow a similar pattern, with the Core Ultra 7 366H achieving 11,960 points in the multicore test and 1,688 points in the single-core test. The older Cinebench R15 benchmark shows 2,870 points multicore and 405 points single-core for the same processor.

PassMark results for the Core Ultra 7 366H cover a range of workloads. The multithread score sits at 33,429, while the single-thread score is 4,043. Data compression reaches 327,455, and data encryption is 25,845. Extended instructions score 26,901, floating point math reaches 103,615, and integer math comes in at 83,695. The physics test shows 2,880, and random string sorting scores 39,814. The find prime numbers test, which is often sensitive to integer throughput, records 326.

The average benchmark score for the Core Ultra 7 366H is 41,263, which places it in the 87th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H with an average score of 41,215, a delta of 0.1 percent, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 with an average score of 41,208, also a delta of 0.1 percent. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X averages 41,376, which puts the Core Ultra 7 366H at -0.3 percent relative to that desktop processor. The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H averages 40,967, leaving the Core Ultra 7 366H ahead by 0.7 percent.

Without recorded benchmarks for the Core 7 150HL, the database cannot provide direct score comparisons. The specification data, however, allows an analysis of where each processor should perform better based on clock speeds, core counts, and architecture.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 7 150HL uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS codename, and is built on Intel’s 10 nm process. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H uses the Panther Lake architecture with the Panther Lake-H codename, fabricated on a 3 nm process. The manufacturing process difference is significant, as the 3 nm node allows for denser transistors and improved power efficiency.

Core configuration differs substantially between the two parts. The Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads, indicating a hybrid layout with performance and efficiency cores, where the thread count exceeds the core count. The Core Ultra 7 366H has 16 cores and 16 threads, meaning every core is single-threaded, which is typical for a design prioritizing fully independent cores over simultaneous multithreading.

Clock speeds favor the Core 7 150HL. Its base clock is 2.40 GHz, and it boosts to 5.00 GHz. The Core Ultra 7 366H operates at a 2.00 GHz base clock and a 4.80 GHz boost clock. The higher boost clock of the Core 7 150HL should provide an advantage in workloads that depend on maximum single-core frequency, assuming the architecture can sustain that frequency.

Cache hierarchies also differ. The Core 7 150HL has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 7 366H has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 7 366H provides more per-core L1 and L2 cache, while the Core 7 150HL offers a larger shared L3 pool.

Memory support follows different paths. The Core 7 150HL supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The Core Ultra 7 366H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, also over a dual-channel bus, and the database records a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. The Core 7 150HL has no memory bandwidth figure recorded.

PCIe connectivity is another differentiator. The Core 7 150HL provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The Core Ultra 7 366H provides Gen 5 with 12 lanes from the CPU, which represents a generational jump in both protocol version and lane count.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 7 150HL uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The Core Ultra 7 366H uses Intel Xe3 Graphics. The database does not list execution unit counts or performance scores for either integrated GPU.

The physical packages are incompatible. The Core 7 150HL uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket, while the Core Ultra 7 366H uses Intel BGA 2540, a mobile soldered package. This means the two processors cannot be interchanged in the same system. The Core 7 150HL is classified as a desktop segment part, while the Core Ultra 7 366H is classified as mobile.

Thermal design power also separates the two. The Core 7 150HL has a TDP of 45 watts. The Core Ultra 7 366H has a TDP of 25 watts. The lower TDP of the Core Ultra 7 366H, combined with the newer process node, indicates an efficiency advantage for mobile implementations.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 7 366H wins in scenarios that benefit from higher core counts and more per-core cache. Its 16 cores and 16 threads provide a wide base for parallel workloads that scale with core count rather than thread count. The larger L1 cache at 192 KB per core and L2 cache at 2.5 MB per core should improve performance in data-heavy operations where cache locality matters.

The Core Ultra 7 366H also wins in memory bandwidth potential, with a recorded 115.2 GB/s, and in PCIe connectivity, with Gen 5 and 12 lanes. Systems built around this processor can support faster storage and expansion devices, assuming compatible platforms exist.

The Core 7 150HL wins on maximum clock speed. Its 5.00 GHz boost clock versus the 4.80 GHz boost clock of the Core Ultra 7 366H gives it an edge in lightly threaded workloads that depend on raw frequency. The 2.40 GHz base clock is also higher, which can help maintain performance under sustained loads before boost behavior takes over.

The Core 7 150HL wins in L3 cache capacity, with 24 MB shared versus 18 MB shared on the Core Ultra 7 366H. This larger pool of shared cache can benefit workloads that reuse a broad working set across multiple cores.

The Core 7 150HL also wins in memory flexibility, supporting DDR4 in addition to DDR5. This allows the processor to be paired with older, more widely available memory modules, which can be relevant for system builders working with existing platforms.

The Core Ultra 7 366H wins in power efficiency, indicated by its 25 watt TDP compared to the 45 watt TDP of the Core 7 150HL. For mobile systems, where thermal and battery constraints dominate, this is a substantial advantage.

The Verdict

The data points to the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H as the stronger processor for most modern workloads, especially those that are parallel in nature. Its 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, combined with an average benchmark score of 41,263, places it in competitive territory with desktop processors like the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, from which it trails by only 0.3 percent. The 16-core, 16-thread configuration and the 3 nm process node give it a structural advantage in both performance and efficiency.

The Intel Core 7 150HL, despite lacking benchmark entries, remains relevant for specific use cases. Its 5.00 GHz boost clock is the highest recorded clock speed between the two processors, and its 45 watt TDP indicates a desktop-oriented design that can sustain higher power draw. The Intel Socket 1700 compatibility makes it a drop-in option for existing desktop platforms, and DDR4 support broadens its memory compatibility.

For a mobile system, the Core Ultra 7 366H is the clear choice based on the recorded data. Its lower TDP, higher core count, newer architecture, faster memory bandwidth, and Gen 5 PCIe support all favor it. The Core 7 150HL, with its desktop socket and higher TDP, is better suited to a stationary desktop build where clock speed and L3 cache capacity matter more than power draw.

Neither processor shows an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a differentiating factor. Both parts are currently listed as active in production status.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H has 16 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has a TDP of 45 watts. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H has a TDP of 25 watts.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe connectivity?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H supports PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core 7 150HL supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL supports DDR4 and DDR5. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H has an average benchmark score of 41,263, which is 0.3 percent lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X average score of 41,376.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 7 150HL | Intel Core Ultra 7 366H |

|----------------|---------------------|--------------------------|

| Cores | 14 | 16 |

| Threads | 20 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.40 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 25 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 2540 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Panther Lake |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-PS | Panther Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 18 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not recorded | 115.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 12 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | Intel Xe3 Graphics |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2024-04-07 | 2026-01-04 |

| Part Number | unknown | SA4R9Q9EL |

| Multiplier Unlocked | false | false |