Intel Core 7 150HL vs Intel Core Ultra 5 338H Comparison

Intel Core 7 150HL and Intel Core Ultra 5 338H are two very different Intel processors. The 150HL is a desktop part built on the Raptor Lake architecture, while the 338H is a mobile processor using the newer Panther Lake architecture. The database contains benchmark results for the Core Ultra 5 338H, but no recorded scores for the Core 7 150HL. This means the performance comparison is one-sided, as the data only shows what the 338H delivers and how it positions against its measured rivals.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core Ultra 5 338H has a recorded average benchmark score of 33989, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs in the database. This is a strong showing for a mobile processor, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of recorded desktop and mobile parts. Its closest measured rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, which has an average score of 34083, making the 338H only 0.3% slower. Against the Intel Core i7-12800HX, the 338H is 0.3% faster, with the i7-12800HX scoring 33875. The Intel Xeon 6353P scores 33844, which puts the 338H 0.4% ahead. The AMD EPYC 4244P scores 34220, placing it 0.7% ahead of the 338H. These small deltas show the Core Ultra 5 338H is tightly clustered with these other processors, all within a single percentage point of each other.

In multi-core workloads, the 338H delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16331 and a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10213. Its Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 2504. The PassMark multithread score is 28717. For single-thread performance, the Cinebench R23 single-core score is 2044, the Cinebench R20 single-core score is 1441, and the Cinebench R15 single-core score is 305. The PassMark single-thread score is 4180. There are no comparable benchmark scores for the Core 7 150HL, so direct head-to-head numbers cannot be presented.

The data also includes specialized workload scores for the 338H. Its PassMark data compression score is 276539, while data encryption scores 21367. Extended instructions score 23906, and finding prime numbers scores 304. Floating point math scores 84067, integer math scores 64934, physics scores 2697, and random string sorting scores 34082. Without scores for the 150HL, these numbers can only be reviewed as standalone performance data for the 338H.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 5 338H is the clear winner in the recorded data, since it is the only one of the two with benchmark results. It wins in every measured category by default, but its placement among rivals shows where its strengths lie. The 338H is a mobile processor with a 25 W TDP, so its ability to match or slightly beat the Core i7-12800HX and Core Ultra 7 165H in average score indicates efficient performance per watt. The Core 7 150HL, with its 45 W TDP and desktop socket, has no recorded benchmark data, so there is no evidence of its performance in any workload.

The 338H uses LPDDR5X memory with a recorded bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s. The 150HL supports DDR4 and DDR5, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded for it. In memory-sensitive tasks, the 338H has a measurable advantage in the database, while the 150HL has no data to confirm its memory performance. The 338H also uses a Gen 5 PCIe connection with 4 lanes, whereas the 150HL uses Gen 4 with 8 lanes. The newer PCIe generation on the 338H could benefit workloads that use fast storage or external devices, though the lane count is lower.

The Core 7 150HL has a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz compared to the 338H's 4.70 GHz. It also has more cores and threads, with 14 cores and 20 threads against the 338H's 12 cores and 12 threads. These specifications suggest the 150HL could have an advantage in heavily threaded workloads if benchmark data existed, but the absence of scores prevents confirmation. The 150HL also has a larger L3 cache of 24 MB shared, compared to 18 MB shared on the 338H.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel architectures and manufacturing nodes. The Core 7 150HL is built on Raptor Lake with the codename Raptor Lake-PS, using a 10 nm process node from Intel. The Core Ultra 5 338H uses the Panther Lake architecture with the codename Panther Lake, on a 3 nm process node, also from Intel. The 3 nm node is a significant manufacturing advantage for the 338H, as it allows for a lower 25 W TDP while still delivering competitive benchmark scores. The 150HL has a higher 45 W TDP, which reflects its desktop-oriented design.

The core configurations differ substantially. The 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the 338H has 12 cores and 12 threads. The 150HL does not support Hyper-Threading in the sense of matching thread count to core count, since it has more threads than cores. The 338H has an equal number of cores and threads, meaning it does not use simultaneous multithreading. Cache layouts also differ. The 150HL has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The 338H has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The 338H has more L1 and L2 cache per core, while the 150HL has more total L3 cache.

Memory support is another major difference. The 150HL supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with no recorded bandwidth number. The 338H supports only LPDDR5X memory, also dual-channel, with a recorded bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s. The integrated graphics differ as well. The 150HL uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while the 338H uses Arc B370 graphics. The 338H's PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU, while the 150HL uses Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The 338H is a mobile part with a BGA 2540 socket, while the 150HL uses the desktop Intel Socket 1700.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core Ultra 5 338H has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Core Ultra 5 338H?

A: The Core Ultra 5 338H has an average benchmark score of 33989, which places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 338H compare to the Core Ultra 7 165H?

A: The Core Ultra 5 338H is 0.3% slower than the Core Ultra 7 165H, which has an average score of 34083.

Q: What memory types do these processors support?

A: The Core 7 150HL supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Core Ultra 5 338H supports LPDDR5X memory only, with a recorded bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Core Ultra 5 338H has 12 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What process node does each processor use?

A: The Core 7 150HL uses a 10 nm process node. The Core Ultra 5 338H uses a 3 nm process node.

The Verdict

The recorded data strongly favors the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H, as it is the only processor with benchmark results. Its 84th percentile ranking and average score of 33989 show it is a capable mobile processor that competes directly with higher-tier parts like the Core Ultra 7 165H and Core i7-12800HX. The 338H achieves this while using a 25 W TDP, which is a notable efficiency advantage over the 150HL's 45 W TDP. The 338H also brings a newer 3 nm process node, faster memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s, and Gen 5 PCIe support.

The Core 7 150HL presents a different set of specifications. It offers more cores, more threads, a higher boost clock, and a larger L3 cache. It also supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, which gives it flexibility in system memory choices. However, the database contains no benchmark scores for the 150HL, so its actual performance cannot be verified. Anyone considering the 150HL for a desktop build would be making a decision based on specifications alone, without measured performance data.

For users who prioritize verified performance and efficiency in a mobile form factor, the Core Ultra 5 338H is the only choice supported by data. For users looking at the Core 7 150HL, the decision depends on the need for a desktop socket, higher core count, and broader memory support, but the lack of benchmark data means its real-world performance is unknown. The 338H is the safer pick based on the evidence in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 7 150HL | Intel Core Ultra 5 338H |

|----------------|---------------------|--------------------------|

| Cores | 14 | 12 |

| Threads | 20 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.40 GHz | 1.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 25 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 2540 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Panther Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 18 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not recorded | 136.5 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 4 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | Arc B370 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2024-04-07 | 2026-01-04 |

| Part Number | unknown | SA4REQ9EW |