Intel Core 7 150HL vs Intel Core i9-14901E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Core i9-14901E holds every recorded benchmark advantage in this comparison, though the Core 7 150HL has no benchmark entries in the database to contest those results. The i9-14901E delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 and a single-core score of 3635. Its Cinebench R20 results are 10816 multi-core and 1526 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 2595 multi-core and 366 single-core. These scores place the i9-14901E in the 86th percentile of all CPUs tracked by the database, with an average benchmark score of 37911.

The closest rival to the i9-14901E is the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, which scores 37904, a delta of exactly 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X records 37943, putting the i9-14901E 0.1 percent behind. The Intel Core 5 211E scores 37829, placing the i9-14901E 0.2 percent ahead, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37804, putting the i9-14901E 0.3 percent ahead. These near-identical average scores indicate the i9-14901E sits in a tightly contested performance band among modern desktop and embedded processors.

In PassMark tests, the i9-14901E shows a multi-thread score of 30298 and a single-thread score of 4354. Integer math reaches 112736, floating point math reaches 81089, and extended instructions score 17249. Data compression scores 288777, data encryption scores 18571, and random string sorting scores 39138. Physics processing records 3041, while find prime numbers scores 189. The single-thread and singlethread PassMark entries both report 4354, confirming consistency across duplicate test labels.

Because the Core 7 150HL has no recorded benchmark scores, the database cannot compute head-to-head wins for either processor. Wins for the 150HL stand at zero, and wins for the i9-14901E also stand at zero in the head-to-head comparison field. The absence of measurements for the 150HL means the i9-14901E's scores are the only quantitative performance data available for this pairing.

Where Each One Wins

The i9-14901E wins in every category where data exists. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 indicates strong sustained multi-threaded rendering capability, while the 3635 single-core score shows high per-thread throughput for lightly threaded workloads. The PassMark multi-thread result of 30298 reinforces the multi-core strength, and the 4354 single-thread score confirms the processor does not sacrifice single-core speed to achieve that parallelism.

The Core 7 150HL cannot claim any measured wins because the database contains no benchmark entries for it. Its percentile ranking of 50 places it at the median of all CPUs, which is substantially below the i9-14901E's 86th percentile. The 150HL's average benchmark score of 0 indicates no test data has been recorded. Without measurements, no workload category can be assigned to the 150HL as a victory.

For the i9-14901E, the data supports strength in content creation, scientific computing, and general productivity. The integer math score of 112736 and floating point math score of 81089 suggest heavy number-crunching tasks benefit significantly. The data compression score of 288777 points to archive handling and database workloads as strong areas. The encryption score of 18571 indicates cryptographic workloads are handled competently, though not as dominant as the math and compression results.

The 150HL's specification sheet does suggest potential strengths in power-sensitive environments, but without benchmark confirmation, those remain unverified in the database. The i9-14901E's recorded results give it a clear measured advantage across every available test category.

Architecture Differences

Both processors use Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and are built on Intel's 10 nm process node. The Core 7 150HL carries the codename Raptor Lake-PS, while the i9-14901E uses the codename Raptor Lake-R, indicating a refresh variant. The i9-14901E belongs to the Core 14th Gen series within the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, whereas the 150HL is listed under the Core 7 generation without a series designation.

The core configurations differ significantly. The Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the i9-14901E achieves higher benchmark scores, indicating that its core design and clock speeds compensate for the lower core count. The die size for the i9-14901E is recorded at 257 mm², while the 150HL has no die size entry in the database.

Cache hierarchies share the same per-core structure: both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core. The shared L3 cache differs, with the 150HL offering 24 MB shared and the i9-14901E offering 36 MB shared. This 12 MB difference in L3 capacity gives the i9-14901E more room for frequently accessed data, which can reduce memory latency in cache-sensitive workloads.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 7 150HL uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while the i9-14901E uses UHD Graphics 770. The 150HL's Iris Xe implementation has more execution units, suggesting stronger integrated graphics performance, though no benchmark data confirms this. The i9-14901E's UHD Graphics 770 is the more common Intel desktop implementation.

ECC memory support also separates the two. The i9-14901E supports ECC memory, while the 150HL does not. This makes the i9-14901E more suitable for error-sensitive computing environments such as servers or workstations where data integrity is critical.

Specification Differences

The base clock differs, with the Core 7 150HL starting at 2.40 GHz and the i9-14901E starting at 2.80 GHz. The boost clock also favors the i9-14901E at 5.60 GHz compared to the 150HL's 5.00 GHz. These clock advantages contribute to the i9-14901E's higher single-thread scores, as higher frequencies directly improve per-core performance.

Thermal design power differs notably. The 150HL has a TDP of 45 watts, while the i9-14901E has a TDP of 65 watts. The 150HL's lower TDP suggests it is designed for power-constrained systems, while the i9-14901E's higher TDP allows for more sustained performance at the cost of additional heat output.

PCIe support differs in both generation and lane count. The 150HL provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU, while the i9-14901E provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The i9-14901E's newer generation and doubled lane count enable higher bandwidth for graphics cards and NVMe storage devices.

Memory support is identical in type and channel configuration: both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. Neither processor has a recorded memory bandwidth figure in the database.

Both processors use Intel Socket 1700, share the same 10 nm process node, and are manufactured by Intel. Neither has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking through multiplier adjustment is not available on either part. The i9-14901E has a recorded part number of Q49ESRNJH, while the 150HL's part number is listed as unknown.

Release dates differ by nearly three months. The 150HL released on 2024-04-07, and the i9-14901E released on 2024-06-30. Both are listed as active production parts with a desktop market segment. Neither processor has a launch MSRP recorded in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads. The 150HL leads in both core count and thread count.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The i9-14901E boosts to 5.60 GHz, while the Core 7 150HL boosts to 5.00 GHz. The i9-14901E also has a higher base clock at 2.80 GHz compared to 2.40 GHz for the 150HL.

Q: What are the benchmark scores for the i9-14901E?

A: The i9-14901E scores 25753 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3635 in single-core. It scores 10816 in Cinebench R20 multi-core and 1526 in single-core, plus 2595 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 366 in single-core. PassMark results include 30298 multi-thread and 4354 single-thread.

Q: Does the Core 7 150HL have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database contains no benchmark entries for the 150HL. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile ranking is 50 among all CPUs.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The i9-14901E supports ECC memory. The Core 7 150HL does not support ECC memory.

Q: How do the integrated graphics compare?

A: The Core 7 150HL uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The i9-14901E uses UHD Graphics 770. The 150HL's Iris Xe config has a higher execution unit count.

Q: What PCIe capabilities does each processor have?

A: The 150HL provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes. The i9-14901E provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, offering newer generation support and double the lane count.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i9-14901E is the only processor in this comparison with measured performance data. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 and single-core score of 3635 place it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37911 that sits within 0.3 percent of its nearest rivals. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a 5.60 GHz boost clock and 36 MB of shared L3 cache delivers strong results across rendering, math, compression, and single-thread workloads.

The Core 7 150HL offers more cores and threads at 14 cores and 20 threads, along with a lower 45 watt TDP and Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. However, the absence of any benchmark scores in the database means its real-world performance cannot be verified. Its 50th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 0 indicate no recorded measurements exist to support a performance claim.

The i9-14901E also provides ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, and a larger 36 MB L3 cache, making it the more feature-complete desktop processor for users who need validated performance and server-like reliability features. The 150HL's lower TDP and higher core count suggest a design aimed at power efficiency and parallel throughput, but without data, those advantages remain theoretical.

For anyone choosing strictly from database measurements, the i9-14901E is the verified performer. The 150HL may appeal to systems where power consumption and integrated graphics execution units matter more than recorded benchmark results, but the data cannot confirm its capabilities. The i9-14901E's benchmark dominance, combined with its ECC support and newer PCIe standard, makes it the recommended pick from the available evidence.