Intel Core 7 150HL vs Intel Core 7 360 Comparison

Intel Core 7 150HL and Intel Core 7 360 are two active Intel processors aimed at different market segments. The 150HL is a desktop part built on Raptor Lake, while the 360 is a mobile processor from the Wildcat Lake family. The database records show a clear split in strengths: the 150HL offers more cores and threads for parallel workloads, while the 360 delivers higher efficiency and a smaller process node.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 150HL wins in scenarios that demand heavy multi-threading. It provides 14 cores and 20 threads, which is more than double the thread count of the Core 7 360, which has 6 cores and 6 threads. For workloads like video rendering, 3D model compilation, or running multiple virtual machines, the extra parallel execution units give the 150HL a decisive edge. The data shows the 150HL has a 24 MB shared L3 cache compared to 6 MB on the 360, which also helps with larger working sets in threaded applications.

The Intel Core 7 360 wins in efficiency and single-thread responsiveness. Its TDP is 15 watts versus 45 watts for the 150HL, making it suitable for fanless or passively cooled mobile designs. The 360 uses a 3 nm process node, while the 150HL uses 10 nm, which explains the power difference. The 360 also has a higher per-core L2 cache at 2.5 MB per core versus 2 MB per core on the 150HL, and a larger L1 cache at 192 KB per core versus 80 KB per core. These cache advantages help with latency-sensitive single-threaded tasks.

The 360 is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark scores in the database. It achieves a 72nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18374. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i3-13100 at 18380 (0% difference), Intel Core 5 330 at 18345 (0.2% behind), Intel Core i3-14100 at 18318 (0.3% behind), and Intel Core 3 305 at 18302 (0.4% behind). This places the 360 in the same performance class as those four-core desktop chips, despite being a mobile processor with a 15-watt TDP.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The Intel Core 7 150HL is based on Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS variant, and belongs to the Core 7 generation. It uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is a desktop platform, and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. Its PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 8 CPU-only lanes. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units.

The Intel Core 7 360 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation in the database, despite its Core 7 branding. It uses Intel BGA 1516, a soldered mobile socket, and supports only DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a single-channel configuration. The memory bandwidth is recorded at 59.7 GB/s. Its PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 6 CPU-only lanes. The integrated graphics are Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores.

The process node difference is significant: the 360 is fabricated on a 3 nm node, while the 150HL uses a 10 nm node. This explains the 360's lower TDP of 15 watts versus 45 watts. The 360 also has a lower base clock of 1.50 GHz compared to 2.40 GHz on the 150HL, but the boost clocks are closer: 4.80 GHz on the 360 versus 5.00 GHz on the 150HL. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors. However, the Intel Core 7 360 has a full set of recorded benchmarks, while the Intel Core 7 150HL has no benchmark entries. The analysis must therefore rely on the 360's absolute scores and the architectural differences to infer relative performance.

For the Intel Core 7 360, Cinebench scores show a multicore strength that is modest given its 6-core, 6-thread configuration. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1374 in multicore and 193 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5726 multicore and 808 single-core. In Cinebench R23, it scores 13634 multicore and 1924 single-core. These numbers indicate that the 360 handles single-threaded applications well, with the R23 single-core score of 1924 being competitive for a mobile chip.

PassMark results for the 360 show specific workload characteristics. Data compression scores 142877, data encryption scores 11164, and extended instructions score 12390. Integer math scores 34238, floating point math scores 44963, and find prime numbers scores 120. Random string sorting scores 17636, physics scores 1213, and multi-thread scores 15544. Single-thread performance is recorded at 4274.

The 150HL, with 14 cores and 20 threads, should outperform the 360 in multicore workloads based on core count alone, but the database provides no direct numbers to confirm this. The 150HL's 5.00 GHz boost clock is 0.20 GHz higher than the 360's 4.80 GHz, which could give it a slight edge in lightly threaded tasks. Its 24 MB L3 cache is four times larger than the 360's 6 MB, which helps in workloads that repeatedly access large datasets.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification field. Core count: 14 on the 150HL versus 6 on the 360. Threads: 20 versus 6. Base clock: 2.40 GHz versus 1.50 GHz. Boost clock: 5.00 GHz versus 4.80 GHz. TDP: 45 watts versus 15 watts. Socket: Intel Socket 1700 versus Intel BGA 1516. Process node: 10 nm versus 3 nm. L1 cache: 80 KB per core versus 192 KB per core. L2 cache: 2 MB per core versus 2.5 MB per core. L3 cache: 24 MB shared versus 6 MB shared.

Memory support differs as well. The 150HL supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory bus. The 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel memory bus and a recorded bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. PCIe lanes: the 150HL has Gen 4 with 8 lanes, while the 360 has Gen 4 with 6 lanes. Integrated graphics: Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on the 150HL versus Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) on the 360. Release dates: the 150HL was released on 2024-04-07, while the 360 was released on 2026-04-15. The 360 has a launch MSRP of $426. The 150HL has no recorded launch MSRP.

Neither processor supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The 360 has a part number of SAE3E, while the 150HL has an unknown part number. The 150HL is classified as a Desktop processor, while the 360 is classified as Mobile.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has a TDP of 45 watts. The Intel Core 7 360 has a TDP of 15 watts.

Q: Which processor has a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 uses a 3 nm process node. The Intel Core 7 150HL uses a 10 nm process node.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus. The Intel Core 7 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel bus.

Q: How does the Intel Core 7 360 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 has an average benchmark score of 18374. It is within 0.4% of the Intel Core i3-13100 (18380), Intel Core 5 330 (18345), Intel Core i3-14100 (18318), and Intel Core 3 305 (18302).

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core 7 360 has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear use-case split. The Intel Core 7 150HL is the choice for desktop builds where multi-threaded performance is the priority. Its 14 cores, 20 threads, 24 MB L3 cache, and 45-watt TDP allow it to sustain heavy parallel workloads, and its dual-channel memory support with DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility for system builders. The 5.00 GHz boost clock provides strong single-thread capability as well, though the database lacks benchmark scores to quantify it.

The Intel Core 7 360 is the choice for mobile systems where power efficiency and small footprint matter more than raw core count. Its 15-watt TDP, 3 nm process, and 6 MB L3 cache make it suitable for thin laptops. The recorded benchmarks show it performs on par with desktop quad-core i3 processors from the 13th and 14th generations, which is a strong result for a chip with such low power draw. The single-channel memory bus and 6 PCIe lanes are limitations, but they align with the mobile segment.

For a builder who needs a desktop CPU for rendering, compilation, or heavy multitasking, the 150HL is the correct pick from the available data. For a mobile user who prioritizes battery life and still wants competitive single-thread performance, the 360 is the sensible option. The 360's release date of 2026-04-15 is later than the 150HL's 2024-04-07, so the 360 benefits from a more recent design, but the 150HL remains the higher-core-count part. The absence of benchmark data for the 150HL means its exact scores are not recorded, but the core and cache specifications point to a multicore advantage that the 360 cannot match.