Intel Core 7 150HL vs Intel Core 7 251TE Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 251TE is the clear performance leader in this pairing, and the benchmark data confirms it across the board. The Core 7 150HL, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so the comparison rests entirely on the 251TE's measured results and the architectural specifications of both parts.

The 251TE delivers a multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 25,518 points, a single-core R23 score of 3,602 points, and a PassMark multithread score of 30,022. Its average benchmark score is 41,650, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The 150HL has an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50, which indicates that no validated performance data exists for it in the database. This makes a direct head-to-head comparison of measured performance impossible, but the 251TE's recorded results show a processor that is positioned for high-throughput workloads.

The 251TE's nearest rivals in the database help contextualize its standing. It sits within 0.1% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H, 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14650HX, 0.3% behind the Intel Core i7-12850HX, and 0.6% behind the Intel Core i7-14700T. These deltas are small, meaning the 251TE trades blows with a cluster of strong desktop and mobile processors. The 150HL, with no benchmark entries, cannot be placed in the same competitive frame.

For single-threaded work, the 251TE records a PassMark single-thread score of 3,568 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,602. These numbers indicate strong per-core performance, which is notable given its modest 1.40 GHz base clock. The 150HL has a higher base clock of 2.40 GHz and a lower boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus the 251TE's 5.40 GHz. The data suggests the 251TE relies on its boost capability for single-thread speed, while the 150HL's higher base clock may help in sustained lower-intensity workloads, but no measured scores exist to confirm this.

In multi-threaded scenarios, the 251TE's advantage is structural. It has 24 cores and 32 threads against the 150HL's 14 cores and 20 threads. The 251TE also carries a larger 36 MB shared L3 cache versus 24 MB on the 150HL. These specifications, combined with its Cinebench R20 multicore score of 10,717 and R15 multicore score of 2,572, point to a processor built for parallel workloads. The 150HL, with fewer cores and threads, would logically fall behind in such tasks, but the database records no score to quantify this gap.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel families. The Core 7 150HL is built on Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename, while the Core 7 251TE uses Bartlett Lake architecture. Both are manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process, but the 251TE has a larger die at 215 mm², while the 150HL has no recorded die size. Both are produced by Intel's own foundry.

Core counts differ substantially. The 251TE offers 24 cores and 32 threads, while the 150HL offers 14 cores and 20 threads. The 251TE's L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core, lower than the 150HL's 2 MB per core, but the 251TE compensates with a larger shared L3 cache of 36 MB versus 24 MB. Both share the same 80 KB per-core L1 cache.

Clock speeds tell a complementary story. The 150HL has a 2.40 GHz base clock and a 5.00 GHz boost clock. The 251TE has a much lower 1.40 GHz base clock but a higher 5.40 GHz boost clock. Both are locked, with no unlocked multiplier. Both carry a 45 W TDP, meaning the performance differences come from architecture, core count, and cache layout rather than power envelope.

Memory support is similar on the surface: both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory buses. The 251TE, however, has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the 150HL has no bandwidth figure in the database. The 251TE also supports ECC memory, while the 150HL does not. This makes the 251TE more suitable for error-sensitive workloads.

PCIe capability diverges sharply. The 150HL offers PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU, while the 251TE offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. This is a significant difference for expansion and data transfer. Integrated graphics also differ: the 150HL uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while the 251TE uses UHD Graphics 770. The 150HL's GPU has more execution units on paper, but no graphics benchmarks exist in the database for either part.

Both processors use the Intel Socket 1700. The 251TE has a launch MSRP of $384, while the 150HL has no recorded launch MSRP. The 251TE's part number is SRQAXQ5ZG, while the 150HL's part number is unknown. Both are active production parts, and both are classified as desktop market segment processors.

The Verdict

The data points clearly to the Intel Core 7 251TE as the stronger processor. It has recorded benchmark scores across multiple suites, a high 88th percentile ranking, ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, and a larger core and cache configuration. The Core 7 150HL has no benchmark entries in the database, which limits its case to its specification sheet alone.

The 251TE should be the choice for workloads that demand multi-core throughput, memory bandwidth, and error-correcting memory. Its 24 cores, 32 threads, 36 MB L3 cache, and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth support this conclusion. Its nearest rivals, all within roughly half a percent in either direction, confirm that it competes at a high level among contemporary desktop processors.

The 150HL offers a higher base clock and more L2 cache per core, which could theoretically benefit lightly threaded or latency-sensitive tasks. Its Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units is a more capable integrated GPU on paper. But without measured benchmark data, these advantages remain speculative. The database records no scores for the 150HL, so its real-world performance cannot be validated.

For users who prioritize proven performance, the 251TE is the only option with empirical backing. For users who need ECC memory or PCIe Gen 5, the 251TE is again the only option. The 150HL's higher base clock and additional graphics execution units are notable, but they do not offset the 251TE's superior core count, cache size, and feature set.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 251TE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the 251TE supports ECC memory. The Core 7 150HL does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Core 7 251TE?

A: The 251TE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The 150HL has no memory bandwidth figure in the database.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The Intel Core 7 150HL has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: What PCIe generation does each processor support?

A: The 251TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The 150HL supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU.

Q: What is the average benchmark score and percentile for the 251TE?

A: The 251TE has an average benchmark score of 41,650 and sits in the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The 150HL has an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile rank.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No direct head-to-head benchmark entries exist in the database for this pairing, so the comparison relies on the 251TE's recorded scores and the 150HL's absence of scores. The 251TE's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25,518 and single-core score of 3,602 are strong markers. Its Cinebench R20 scores are 10,717 multicore and 1,512 single-core, and its Cinebench R15 scores are 2,572 multicore and 362 single-core.

PassMark results for the 251TE show a multithread score of 30,022 and a single-thread score of 3,568. In specific workloads, it records 125,739 in integer math, 85,607 in floating-point math, 334,399 in data compression, and 22,176 in data encryption. Extended instructions score 16,974, random string sorting scores 39,643, physics scores 1,938, and find prime numbers scores 140.

The nearest rival comparisons for the 251TE show a tightly grouped competitive field. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H scores 41,621 on average, just 0.1% below the 251TE. The Intel Core i7-14650HX scores 41,576, 0.2% below. The Intel Core i7-12850HX scores 41,779, 0.3% above. The Intel Core i7-14700T scores 41,914, 0.6% above. These margins are narrow, placing the 251TE within a small performance cluster.

The 150HL contributes no benchmark scores to this comparison. Its specification sheet shows a 2.40 GHz base clock, a 5.00 GHz boost clock, 14 cores, 20 threads, and 24 MB of L3 cache. These figures suggest a competent mid-range desktop part, but the database contains no measured results to verify its standing.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification category, despite sharing a socket and TDP.

The 251TE uses 24 cores and 32 threads, while the 150HL uses 14 cores and 20 threads. The 251TE's base clock is 1.40 GHz and boost clock is 5.40 GHz, versus 2.40 GHz and 5.00 GHz for the 150HL. Both have a 45 W TDP.

The 251TE is built on Bartlett Lake architecture with a 215 mm² die, while the 150HL uses Raptor Lake with the Raptor Lake-PS codename and no recorded die size. Both use Intel's 10 nm process.

Cache layouts differ: the 150HL has 2 MB of L2 per core and 24 MB of shared L3, while the 251TE has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 36 MB of shared L3. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core.

Memory support is DDR4 and DDR5 on both, with dual-channel buses. The 251TE adds ECC memory support and a recorded 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth. The 150HL has no bandwidth figure and no ECC support.

PCIe capabilities differ significantly: the 251TE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the 150HL offers Gen 4 with 8 lanes. Integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units on the 150HL and UHD Graphics 770 on the 251TE.

The 251TE has a launch MSRP of $384, a part number of SRQAXQ5ZG, and a release date of 2025-01-12. The 150HL has no launch MSRP, an unknown part number, and a release date of 2024-04-07. Both are active, desktop-segment, locked-multiplier processors on Intel Socket 1700.