Intel Core 5 330 vs Intel Core i5-14500T Comparison

Intel Core 5 330 and Intel Core i5-14500T occupy different performance tiers despite both being Intel parts. The Core i5-14500T wins the majority of head-to-head tests, taking 12 of 17 comparisons, while the Core 5 330 wins 5. However, the nature of those wins reveals a clear split: the i5-14500T dominates in multi-threaded throughput and memory-heavy workloads, while the Core 5 330 shows superior efficiency in specific single-thread and prime-number tasks. The average benchmark scores confirm the gap, with the i5-14500T at 28065 against 18345 for the Core 5 330, placing the former in the 80th percentile of all CPUs versus the 72nd for the latter.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14500T is the clear choice for multi-threaded and data-intensive workloads. Its 14 cores and 20 threads provide a substantial advantage in parallel tasks. In PassMark integer math, it scores 80922 versus 33258, a difference of 58.9%. Data compression shows a similar story, with the i5-14500T reaching 262417 against 145287, a 44.6% margin. The i5-14500T also wins in floating-point math, extended instructions, data encryption, multi-thread, random string sorting, and physics tests. Cinebench R15 and R20 multicore results also favor the i5-14500T, with margins of 34.5% and 32.5% respectively.

The Intel Core 5 330 wins in fewer tests, but its victories are notable for their specific nature. It leads in PassMark single-thread with 4088 against 3736, a 9.4% advantage. It also wins PassMark find prime numbers with 114 versus 81, a 40.7% margin. In Cinebench R23, the Core 5 330 takes both multicore and singlecore, with 13150 versus 11790 (11.5% ahead) and 1856 versus 1838 (1% ahead) respectively. This pattern suggests the Core 5 330 favors workloads that benefit from its newer architecture and lower power envelope, while the i5-14500T leverages its core count for raw throughput.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different generations and target different market segments. The Core 5 330 uses the Wildcat Lake codename, part of the Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) generation, built on a 3 nm process node. The i5-14500T uses Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core 14th Gen series, on a 10 nm process. The Core 5 330 is a mobile part with a 15 TDP, while the i5-14500T is a desktop processor with a 35 TDP.

Core configuration differs sharply. The Core 5 330 has 6 cores and 6 threads, meaning no hyper-threading. The i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads, indicating a hybrid design with performance and efficiency cores. Cache allocation also differs: the Core 5 330 has 192 KB L1, 2.5 MB L2, and 6 MB shared L3, while the i5-14500T has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. The i5-14500T also has a larger die size at 215 mm², while the Core 5 330 does not report a die size.

Memory support separates the two further. The Core 5 330 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel memory bus and 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. The i5-14500T supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, though no bandwidth figure is recorded. The i5-14500T also supports ECC memory, while the Core 5 330 does not. PCIe capabilities differ, with the Core 5 330 offering Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes and the i5-14500T offering Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well, with the Core 5 330 using Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) and the i5-14500T using UHD Graphics 770.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest margin in the comparison belongs to the i5-14500T in PassMark integer math, where it leads by 58.9%. The Core 5 330 scores 33258, while the i5-14500T reaches 80922. This is the clearest indicator of the core-count advantage in arithmetic-heavy parallel work.

Data compression shows the second-largest gap, with the i5-14500T ahead by 44.6%. The score of 262417 versus 145287 reflects the i5-14500T's ability to handle large data streams more efficiently. Random string sorting follows with a 37.6% margin in favor of the i5-14500T, scoring 28462 against 17771. Cinebench R15 multicore gives the i5-14500T a 34.5% lead, and R20 multicore shows a 32.5% margin. PassMark multi-thread also shows a 32.5% gap, with the i5-14500T at 22910 versus 15471. PassMark data encryption has the i5-14500T ahead by 28.1%, and floating-point math shows a 25.5% margin. Extended instructions favor the i5-14500T by 20.2%, while physics shows a smaller 6.8% lead.

The Core 5 330 takes its largest win in PassMark find prime numbers, leading by 40.7% with 114 against 81. PassMark single-thread shows a 9.4% advantage, with 4088 versus 3736. Cinebench R23 multicore gives the Core 5 330 an 11.5% lead, and R23 singlecore shows a narrow 1% margin. Cinebench R15 singlecore and R20 singlecore both favor the i5-14500T, with margins of 26.2% and 32.5% respectively, but the Core 5 330 compensates in the newer R23 singlecore test.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 5 330 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has an average benchmark score of 28065, while the Intel Core 5 330 scores 18345. The i5-14500T also ranks in the 80th percentile of all CPUs, compared to the 72nd percentile for the Core 5 330.

Q: In which benchmark does the Intel Core 5 330 have its largest winning margin?

A: The Core 5 330 leads by 40.7% in PassMark find prime numbers, scoring 114 against 81 for the i5-14500T.

Q: In which benchmark does the Intel Core i5-14500T have its largest winning margin?

A: The i5-14500T leads by 58.9% in PassMark integer math, scoring 80922 against 33258 for the Core 5 330.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The Core 5 330 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the i5-14500T supports DDR4 and DDR5. The i5-14500T also supports ECC memory, which the Core 5 330 does not.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 330 has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear split in use cases. The Intel Core i5-14500T is the stronger processor for multi-threaded workloads, data compression, encryption, and integer-heavy tasks. Its 14-core, 20-thread configuration delivers decisive margins in PassMark integer math, data compression, and Cinebench R15 and R20 multicore tests. Its average benchmark score of 28065 and 80th percentile ranking place it well above the Core 5 330 in overall performance. It also offers dual-channel memory support, ECC memory, and Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes, making it suitable for desktop systems that need broader I/O and memory flexibility.

The Intel Core 5 330 wins in PassMark single-thread, find prime numbers, and Cinebench R23 tests. Its 3 nm process and Wildcat Lake architecture provide efficiency advantages, reflected in its 15 TDP compared to the 35 TDP of the i5-14500T. For workloads that rely on single-thread speed or prime-number computation, the Core 5 330 is competitive despite its lower core count. Its 9.4% single-thread lead and 40.7% prime-number lead show that newer architecture can offset core disadvantages in specific tasks.

The i5-14500T is the choice when raw multi-threaded performance and desktop features matter more. The Core 5 330 suits scenarios where power efficiency and specific single-thread tasks take priority, given its mobile segment and lower TDP. The recorded data does not support the Core 5 330 as a general replacement for the i5-14500T, but it confirms its strengths in targeted workloads.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 330 | Intel Core i5-14500T |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 14 |

| Threads | 6 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 1.50 GHz | 1.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 15 | 35 |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1516 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Wildcat Lake | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 10 nm |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 6 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Single-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 59.7 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-04-15 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $309 | $232 |