Intel Core 5 320 vs Intel Core i5-14600T Comparison

Intel Core 5 320 vs Intel Core i5-14600T: a matchup between a 6-core mobile chip on Intel’s newest 3 nm process and a 14-core desktop part from the Raptor Lake refresh. The data shows a clear split: the i5-14600T dominates multi-threaded and most single-threaded workloads, while the Core 5 320 takes one specific PassMark single-thread test. Here is the breakdown from the recorded benchmarks.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-14600T wins 15 of the 17 recorded head-to-head tests, and its margins are often massive. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i5-14600T scores 22447 against the Core 5 320’s 6197, a 72.4% advantage. The gap is similar in Cinebench R20 multi-core: 9427 versus 5462, a 42.1% lead for the i5-14600T. Even in Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i5-14600T posts 2262 versus 1054, a 53.4% difference. These results indicate that the i5-14600T delivers roughly double the multi-threaded render performance of the Core 5 320 in most Cinebench iterations.

Single-core Cinebench results also favor the i5-14600T, though by smaller margins. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the i5-14600T scores 3169 versus 1926, a 39.2% lead. Cinebench R20 single-core shows 1330 versus 771, a 42% advantage, and Cinebench R15 single-core shows 319 versus 276, a 13.5% edge. The i5-14600T’s higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz, compared to the Core 5 320’s 4.60 GHz, aligns with these single-thread wins.

PassMark integer math is another decisive win for the i5-14600T: 95112 versus 32323, a 66% delta. Data compression also favors the i5-14600T strongly, with 301827 versus 148779, a 50.7% lead. Random string sorting goes to the i5-14600T at 34310 versus 18038, a 47.4% difference. Floating point math shows 64726 versus 42440, a 34.4% gap, and multi-thread testing shows 26409 versus 15450, a 41.5% lead for the i5-14600T.

The Core 5 320 wins exactly two tests, both PassMark single-thread variants with identical scores: 4045 versus 3744, an 8% advantage. That is the only benchmark category where the Core 5 320 beats the i5-14600T, indicating its single-core efficiency on the 3 nm node can outperform the older desktop chip in that specific workload. However, the i5-14600T counters with wins in PassMark physics (1873 versus 1221, a 34.8% lead), data encryption (18226 versus 10984, a 39.7% lead), extended instructions (16985 versus 13262, a 21.9% lead), and find prime numbers (121 versus 110, a 9.1% lead).

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel design families. The Core 5 320 uses the Wildcat Lake codename, part of the Core 5 generation, built on a 3 nm process node. It has 6 cores and 6 threads, meaning no hyper-threading, with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its cache layout includes 192 KB of L1, 2.5 MB of L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. The chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a single-channel memory bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. It uses Intel BGA 1516 socket, which is a mobile platform, and its market segment is listed as Mobile. The integrated graphics are Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. PCIe support is Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes.

The Intel Core i5-14600T belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, codename Raptor Lake-R, built on a 10 nm process. It has 14 cores and 20 threads, indicating a mix of performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. Cache memory is larger: 80 KB per core of L1, 2 MB per core of L2, and 24 MB of shared L3. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel memory bus, though no memory bandwidth figure is recorded for this part. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, a desktop platform, and the die size is 257 mm². It supports ECC memory, which the Core 5 320 does not. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770.

The process node difference is substantial: 3 nm versus 10 nm. That explains the Core 5 320’s lower power draw of 15 W TDP versus the i5-14600T’s 35 W TDP, though the i5-14600T uses its higher power budget to deliver far more compute. The Core 5 320’s single-channel memory controller and smaller L3 cache (6 MB shared versus 24 MB shared) directly impact its multi-threaded throughput.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14600T is the clear choice for multi-threaded workloads. Its 20 threads versus 6 threads, combined with a 24 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory, give it a 72.4% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and a 66% lead in PassMark integer math. Any task that scales with core count, such as video rendering, data compression, or physics simulations, will see the i5-14600T roughly 40% to 72% ahead of the Core 5 320 based on the recorded deltas. The i5-14600T also wins every single-core Cinebench test, with margins from 13.5% to 42%, so even lightly threaded applications like older games or office tools favor the desktop chip.

The Core 5 320 wins only the PassMark single-thread test, with an 8% edge over the i5-14600T. That specific test measures single-thread performance in a way that rewards the Core 5 320’s 3 nm process and higher IPC per clock. For users running workloads that are purely single-threaded and heavily dependent on that exact PassMark metric, the Core 5 320 holds a small advantage. However, the i5-14600T’s single-core wins in all three Cinebench tests suggest that the Core 5 320’s PassMark victory may be workload-specific rather than a general single-thread superiority.

The Core 5 320 also has a significant power efficiency advantage, with a 15 W TDP versus 35 W, and it is a mobile part. That makes it suited for battery-powered or compact devices where thermals and power draw are primary constraints. The i5-14600T, with its desktop socket and 35 W TDP, requires a standard desktop platform but offers ECC memory support and Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes, which the Core 5 320 lacks.

The Verdict

From the benchmark data, the Intel Core i5-14600T is the stronger processor in nearly every measurable workload. Its 15 wins out of 17 head-to-head tests includes all multi-core Cinebench results, all single-core Cinebench results, and most PassMark categories. The largest margins are in Cinebench R23 multi-core (72.4% lead) and PassMark integer math (66% lead), which indicate a massive throughput advantage for rendering and arithmetic tasks. The i5-14600T also holds a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs at 83, versus the Core 5 320’s 72, and its average benchmark score of 32707 is nearly double the Core 5 320’s 18023.

The Core 5 320 is not without merit. Its 8% win in PassMark single-thread shows that its 3 nm process yields strong per-core efficiency, and its 15 W TDP makes it a low-power mobile option. It also uses a newer process node (3 nm versus 10 nm) and supports LPDDR5X memory, which is relevant for laptops. However, the performance gap in multi-threaded and most single-threaded tests is too large to recommend it for any performance-oriented desktop use. The i5-14600T, with 14 cores, 20 threads, and a 5.10 GHz boost clock, is the choice for users who need compute power. The Core 5 320 fits only in scenarios where power draw and mobile form factor trump raw performance, and even then, its single-thread advantage over the i5-14600T is limited to one benchmark.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 5 320 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest recorded gap is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the i5-14600T scores 22447 versus the Core 5 320’s 6197, a 72.4% difference.

Q: Does the Core 5 320 win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the Core 5 320 wins the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 4045 versus 3744, an 8% advantage. It wins the same test twice under two similar names.

Q: What are the TDP differences?

A: The Core 5 320 has a 15 W TDP, and the i5-14600T has a 35 W TDP.

Q: Do these processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The Core 5 320 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a single-channel bus. The i5-14600T supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The i5-14600T has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the Core 5 320 has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 320 | Intel Core i5-14600T |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 6 | 14 |

| Threads | 6 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 1.50 GHz | 1.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1516 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 10 nm |

| Codename | Wildcat Lake | Raptor Lake-R |

| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 6 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Single-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 59.7 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 257 mm² |

| Launch MSRP | $340 | $255 |