Intel Core 5 320 vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts for the Intel Core 5 320 and the Intel Core i5-14501TE?

A: Both processors have 6 physical cores. The Intel Core 5 320 has 6 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has 12 threads due to Hyper-Threading support.

Q: How do their boost clocks compare?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE reaches a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz, whereas the Intel Core 5 320 boosts up to 4.60 GHz. The base clocks differ as well, with the i5-14501TE running at 2.20 GHz versus 1.50 GHz for the Core 5 320.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 5 320 does not list ECC memory support in its specifications.

Q: What are the process nodes for each chip?

A: The Intel Core 5 320 is built on a 3 nm process node, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE uses a 10 nm process node. Both are manufactured by Intel.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 320 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What integrated graphics do they feature?

A: The Intel Core 5 320 includes Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The Intel Core i5-14501TE integrates UHD Graphics 770.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14501TE wins decisively in multi-threaded workloads. Its 12 threads versus 6 threads provide a substantial advantage in tasks that scale with thread count. The higher base clock of 2.20 GHz and boost clock of 5.10 GHz further strengthen its position in sustained throughput scenarios. This processor also supports dual-channel memory and DDR4 in addition to DDR5, giving it flexibility in memory configurations.

The Intel Core 5 320 wins in power efficiency and platform compactness. Its 15 W TDP is significantly lower than the 45 W TDP of the i5-14501TE, making it suitable for thin-and-light mobile designs. The 3 nm process node indicates a more advanced manufacturing technology that contributes to lower power draw. The Core 5 320 also uses a smaller BGA 1516 socket, which is typical for mobile form factors.

In single-thread performance, the data shows the Core 5 320 delivers strong results. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1926 points is competitive despite a lower boost clock. The PassMark single-thread score of 4045 reinforces this strength. For workloads that rely on single-core responsiveness, such as everyday application usage, the Core 5 320 holds its ground.

The i5-14501TE wins in memory bandwidth potential due to dual-channel support. The Core 5 320 has single-channel memory support with a measured bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The i5-14501TE does not have a listed memory bandwidth figure, but dual-channel architecture typically doubles the theoretical throughput compared to single-channel.

The Core 5 320 wins in PCIe generation for its platform, but the i5-14501TE wins in lane count. The i5-14501TE provides 16 CPU lanes of PCIe Gen 5, while the Core 5 320 offers 6 CPU lanes of PCIe Gen 4. This makes the i5-14501TE better suited for desktop systems with discrete GPUs and multiple NVMe drives.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural families. The Intel Core 5 320 uses the Wildcat Lake architecture and belongs to the Core 5 generation. The Intel Core i5-14501TE is based on Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series.

The manufacturing process marks a major divergence. The Core 5 320 uses a 3 nm node, while the i5-14501TE uses a 10 nm node. This process difference impacts transistor density and power characteristics. The Core 5 320 lacks a listed die size, while the i5-14501TE has a die size of 215 mm².

Cache hierarchy differs substantially between the two. The Core 5 320 has a total L1 cache of 192 KB, an L2 cache of 2.5 MB, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The i5-14501TE lists its L1 cache as 80 KB per core, L2 cache as 1.25 MB per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. With 6 cores, the i5-14501TE's per-core L1 and L2 figures translate to 480 KB L1 and 7.5 MB L2 total, both larger than the Core 5 320's aggregate cache.

Memory controller architecture differs. The Core 5 320 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a single-channel bus. The i5-14501TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus. The i5-14501TE also supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the Core 5 320.

Integrated graphics represent a generational split. The Core 5 320 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, a newer graphics architecture. The i5-14501TE uses UHD Graphics 770, which is based on the previous generation Intel graphics design.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 320 | Intel Core i5-14501TE |

|----------------|------------------|------------------------|

| Threads | 6 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 1.50 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 45 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1516 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 10 nm |

| Die Size | Not listed | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 192 KB total | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB total | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 6 MB shared | 24 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Single-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 59.7 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 6 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-04-15 | 2024-06-30 |

| Launch MSRP | $340 | Not listed |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains benchmark results for the Intel Core 5 320, but the Intel Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores. The head-to-head comparison therefore relies on the Core 5 320's absolute scores and its position relative to known rivals.

The Core 5 320 achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 6197 and a single-core score of 1926. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5462 multicore and 771 single-core. Cinebench R15 results show 1054 multicore and 276 single-core. These scores indicate a processor with balanced performance across both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks.

PassMark results for the Core 5 320 include a multithread score of 15450 and a single-thread score of 4045. The data compression test yields a score of 148779, while data encryption scores 10984. Extended instructions score 13262, floating point math scores 42440, and integer math scores 32323. The find prime numbers test scores 110, physics scores 1221, and random string sorting scores 18038.

The average benchmark score for the Core 5 320 is 18023, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 with an average score of 17994, a 0.2% difference, and the Intel Core 5 120U with an average score of 17898, a 0.7% difference. The Intel Core i5-1334U scores 18154 on average, which is 0.7% higher than the Core 5 320. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT averages 17891, also 0.7% lower than the Core 5 320.

These rival comparisons show the Core 5 320 sits in a tight performance cluster. It trails the i5-1334U by less than one percent while leading the Ryzen 5 3600XT by a similar margin. This positions the Core 5 320 as a mid-tier performer despite its low TDP and mobile form factor.

For the i5-14501TE, the absence of benchmark data means no direct score comparison is possible. However, its architectural advantages in thread count, cache size, and clock speeds suggest it would outperform the Core 5 320 in multi-threaded scenarios. The 12 threads versus 6 threads alone represents a doubling of parallel execution capacity. The 24 MB L3 cache versus 6 MB provides a fourfold increase in shared cache, which benefits workloads with large working sets.

The i5-14501TE's higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 4.60 GHz also indicates an advantage in single-threaded performance, though the Core 5 320's 3 nm process may allow it to sustain higher clocks under power constraints. The Core 5 320's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1926 is respectable, but the i5-14501TE's clock advantage of 0.5 GHz would likely translate to a lead in this metric.

The Verdict

The data presents two processors designed for different market segments. The Intel Core i5-14501TE targets desktop systems where power draw is less constrained and performance is the priority. Its 12 threads, dual-channel memory support, 24 MB L3 cache, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes make it the clear choice for multi-threaded productivity, content creation, and workloads that benefit from large caches and high memory bandwidth.

The Intel Core 5 320 targets mobile platforms. Its 15 W TDP and compact BGA 1516 socket suit thin laptops and all-in-one designs. The 3 nm process node and single-channel memory support reflect a focus on efficiency rather than raw throughput. Despite this, its benchmark scores show it competes with desktop processors from earlier generations, as evidenced by its near-parity with the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 and Ryzen 5 3600XT.

Users who need a desktop processor with strong multithreading, ECC memory support, and expandable PCIe connectivity should select the Intel Core i5-14501TE. The recorded data confirms its higher clocks and larger cache, though its benchmark scores are not available in the database for direct comparison.

Users who prioritize portability and low power consumption should select the Intel Core 5 320. Its benchmark results demonstrate capable single-thread performance and a multithread score that places it in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs. The 3 nm process and 15 W TDP make it an efficient choice for mobile devices.

The i5-14501TE has a 45 W TDP, which is three times higher than the Core 5 320's 15 W TDP. This difference directly impacts thermal management and battery life in portable systems. For desktop builds with adequate cooling, the i5-14501TE's higher power budget enables sustained performance.

The Core 5 320's launch MSRP is $340, while the i5-14501TE has no listed launch MSRP in the database. This pricing information appears in the specifications but should not be used to infer value or cost-effectiveness.

In summary, the Intel Core i5-14501TE is the stronger processor for multi-threaded desktop workloads due to its thread count, cache size, and clock speeds. The Intel Core 5 320 is the more efficient mobile processor with competitive single-thread performance and a modern 3 nm manufacturing process. The choice between them depends entirely on the target platform and workload requirements.