Intel Core 5 320 vs Intel Core i5-14500T Comparison

Intel Core 5 320 and Intel Core i5-14500T represent two distinct Intel designs: one a low-power mobile processor on a 3 nm node, the other a desktop chip on the 10 nm Raptor Lake architecture. The benchmark data shows a clear split: the Core 5 320 wins every single-threaded test in the comparison, while the Core i5-14500T dominates multi-threaded and compute-heavy workloads. The Core 5 320 records 5 wins against 12 for the Core i5-14500T, but the nature of those wins matters more than the count.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 320 stops at 4.60 GHz.

Q: How do the core counts differ between these two CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads, whereas the Intel Core 5 320 has 6 cores and 6 threads, so the i5-14500T offers more than double the cores and more than triple the thread count.

Q: Which chip has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core 5 320 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, both support DDR5. The Core i5-14500T also supports DDR4, and the Core 5 320 additionally supports LPDDR5X.

Q: What is the market segment for each CPU?

A: The Core 5 320 is a mobile processor, while the Core i5-14500T is a desktop processor.

Q: Which chip shows a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Core i5-14500T sits at the 80th percentile, while the Core 5 320 is at the 72nd percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 320 wins in single-thread performance across the board. In Cinebench R15 single-core, it scores 276 against 252 for the Core i5-14500T, a 9.5% advantage. Cinebench R23 single-core shows 1926 versus 1838, a 4.8% lead. PassMark single-thread confirms the pattern: 4045 against 3736, an 8.3% edge. The one outlier is Cinebench R20 single-core, where the Core i5-14500T wins at 1154 versus 771, a 33.2% margin. The Core 5 320 also wins PassMark find prime numbers at 110 versus 81, a 35.8% lead.

The Core i5-14500T wins every multi-threaded test. Cinebench R15 multicore shows 2022 versus 1054, a 47.9% gap. Cinebench R23 multicore delivers 11790 versus 6197, a 47.4% difference. PassMark integer math is the largest single win: 80922 versus 32323, a 60.1% margin. PassMark multithread shows 22910 versus 15450, a 32.6% gap. Other notable wins include PassMark data compression at 262417 versus 148779 (43.3%), random string sorting at 28462 versus 18038 (36.6%), and floating point math at 58869 versus 42440 (27.9%). PassMark physics is close, with the Core i5-14500T leading 1288 to 1221, a 5.2% margin.

Architecture Differences

The Core 5 320 uses the Wildcat Lake codename on a 3 nm process node, built by Intel. It has 6 cores and 6 threads, with no hyperthreading. The Core i5-14500T uses the Raptor Lake-R codename on a 10 nm process node. It has 14 cores and 20 threads, indicating a hybrid configuration of performance and efficiency cores. The die size for the Core i5-14500T is 215 mm²; no die size is recorded for the Core 5 320.

Cache structures differ substantially. The Core 5 320 has 192 KB of L1 cache, 2.5 MB of L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i5-14500T has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The per-core figures for the Core i5-14500T imply a larger total cache footprint across its 14 cores.

Memory support diverges. The Core 5 320 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel memory bus and 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. The Core i5-14500T supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus; no bandwidth figure is recorded. ECC memory is supported on the Core i5-14500T but not on the Core 5 320.

PCIe capabilities also differ. The Core 5 320 offers Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes. The Core i5-14500T offers Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well: the Core 5 320 has Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, while the Core i5-14500T has UHD Graphics 770.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification. The Core 5 320 has a base clock of 1.50 GHz, while the Core i5-14500T has a base clock of 1.70 GHz. Boost clocks are 4.60 GHz and 4.80 GHz, respectively. Thermal design power is 15 W for the Core 5 320 and 35 W for the Core i5-14500T.

Sockets are incompatible: the Core 5 320 uses Intel BGA 1516, and the Core i5-14500T uses Intel Socket 1700. The Core 5 320 is a mobile part; the Core i5-14500T is a desktop part. Release dates differ: the Core 5 320 launched in April 2026, while the Core i5-14500T launched in January 2024. The Core 5 320 has a launch MSRP of $340, and the Core i5-14500T has a launch MSRP of $232.

Memory channels: the Core 5 320 is single-channel, the Core i5-14500T is dual-channel. The Core 5 320 has no ECC support; the Core i5-14500T has ECC support. PCIe generations and lane counts differ as described above. The Core 5 320 uses 6 cores and 6 threads; the Core i5-14500T uses 14 cores and 20 threads. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive win for the Core i5-14500T is PassMark integer math, where it scores 80922 against 32323, a 60.1% advantage. This workload benefits directly from the extra cores and threads. Cinebench R15 multicore shows 2022 versus 1054, a 47.9% gap, and Cinebench R23 multicore shows 11790 versus 6197, a 47.4% gap. These results indicate that the Core i5-14500T roughly doubles the multi-threaded performance of the Core 5 320 in Cinebench tests.

PassMark data compression shows 262417 versus 148779, a 43.3% lead for the Core i5-14500T. Random string sorting follows at 28462 versus 18038, a 36.6% margin. PassMark multithread shows 22910 versus 15450, a 32.6% gap. Cinebench R20 multicore gives 8177 versus 5462, a 33.2% difference. PassMark data encryption shows 15410 versus 10984, a 28.7% lead. Floating point math shows 58869 versus 42440, a 27.9% edge. Extended instructions show 16043 versus 13262, a 17.3% advantage. Physics is the narrowest multi-threaded win: 1288 versus 1221, a 5.2% margin.

The Core 5 320 wins single-threaded tests. Cinebench R15 single-core shows 276 versus 252, a 9.5% lead. PassMark single-thread shows 4045 versus 3736, an 8.3% margin. Cinebench R23 single-core shows 1926 versus 1838, a 4.8% edge. PassMark find prime numbers shows 110 versus 81, a 35.8% lead. The single exception to this trend is Cinebench R20 single-core, where the Core i5-14500T wins at 1154 versus 771, a 33.2% margin. This result is inconsistent with the other single-threaded data, but it is the recorded measurement.

Average benchmark scores reflect the overall balance. The Core i5-14500T has an average benchmark score of 28065, while the Core 5 320 averages 18023. The Core i5-14500T sits at the 80th percentile among all CPUs, the Core 5 320 at the 72nd percentile. Nearest rivals for the Core i5-14500T include the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE with a delta of 0%, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G at 0.1%, the Intel Core i9-12900H at 0.2%, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 at -0.2%. The Core 5 320 sits near the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 at 0.2%, the Intel Core 5 120U at 0.7%, the Intel Core i5-1334U at -0.7%, and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT at 0.7%.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear division of roles. The Intel Core i5-14500T is the choice for multi-threaded throughput. It wins 12 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks, including all heavy compute workloads. The 60.1% lead in integer math, the 47.9% lead in Cinebench R15 multicore, and the 47.4% lead in Cinebench R23 multicore show that applications using many threads will perform at roughly double the level of the Core 5 320. The larger L3 cache at 24 MB, dual-channel memory, and 14 cores support this advantage.

The Intel Core 5 320 is the choice for single-thread latency. It wins every single-threaded comparison except Cinebench R20, with margins from 4.8% to 9.5% in Cinebench R15 and R23 and PassMark. The 35.8% lead in prime number finding suggests particular strength in integer-heavy single-threaded loops. Its lower 15 W TDP, 3 nm process node, and mobile BGA 1516 socket indicate a power-lean design for portable systems.

Desktop users with multi-threaded workloads should favor the Core i5-14500T. Its Socket 1700 compatibility, Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes, and ECC support make it the more expandable platform. Mobile users prioritizing responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks and battery-conscious operation should favor the Core 5 320. The benchmark record shows no ambiguity: the Core i5-14500T delivers substantially higher aggregate performance, while the Core 5 320 delivers higher per-thread speed in most tests.