Intel Core 5 315 vs Intel Core i5-14500T Comparison

The Intel Core 5 315 and Intel Core i5-14500T represent two distinct approaches to Intel processor design, with the former built for mobile efficiency and the latter for desktop performance. The recorded data shows a clear split between multi-threaded workloads, where the i5-14500T dominates, and specific single-threaded tasks, where the Core 5 315 shows unexpected strength. The average benchmark score for the Core 5 315 is 18188, placing it at the 72nd percentile, while the i5-14500T averages 28065, reaching the 80th percentile. This gap of nearly 10,000 points in average score underscores the performance hierarchy between the two, despite the newer manufacturing process used by the mobile chip.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has a significantly higher average benchmark score of 28065 compared to the Intel Core 5 315's 18188. This difference of 9877 points places the i5-14500T at the 80th percentile versus the 72nd percentile for the Core 5 315.

Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core 5 315 wins this test with a score of 12981, which is 10.1% ahead of the i5-14500T's 11790. This is notable because the i5-14500T has more cores and threads, but the newer architecture of the Core 5 315 delivers a higher multi-core score in this specific workload.

Q: Which processor wins the PassMark integer math test?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T wins decisively with a score of 80922, which is 60.8% higher than the Core 5 315's 31690. This is the largest performance gap recorded in any of the head-to-head benchmark comparisons.

Q: What is the difference in single-thread performance according to PassMark?

A: The Intel Core 5 315 wins the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 4021, which is 7.6% ahead of the i5-14500T's 3736. This result appears twice in the data, confirming the Core 5 315's edge in this metric.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, which is higher than the Core 5 315's 4.40 GHz. The base clocks also differ, with the i5-14500T starting at 1.70 GHz versus the Core 5 315's 1.50 GHz.

Q: How does the memory bus configuration differ between the two?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T uses a dual-channel memory bus, while the Core 5 315 uses a single-channel bus. The i5-14500T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, whereas the Core 5 315 supports only DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the Intel Core i5-14500T for most demanding workloads. It wins 13 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons, including every Cinebench R15 and R20 test, all but one PassMark multi-threaded test, and the majority of the specialized math and data tasks. The i5-14500T's wins in integer math (60.8% ahead), data compression (44.3% ahead), and random string sorting (38.3% ahead) are particularly decisive, making it the appropriate choice for desktop users who run heavy productivity applications, content creation tools, or any software that scales with core count and thread count.

The Intel Core 5 315 wins only 4 of the 17 comparisons, but its victories are concentrated in areas that matter for specific use cases. It wins Cinebench R23 multi-core (10.1% ahead), PassMark find prime numbers (38.3% ahead), and PassMark single-thread (7.6% ahead). The R23 multi-core win is significant because it suggests the newer architecture can outperform the older design in certain modern workloads, despite having fewer cores. Users who prioritize single-threaded responsiveness, such as in lightly threaded applications or older software, may find the Core 5 315 delivers adequate performance, but the data shows its wins are narrow compared to the i5-14500T's broad dominance.

The i5-14500T is the clear recommendation for users who need maximum throughput across a wide range of tasks. The Core 5 315, with its 15 W TDP and mobile BGA socket, is positioned for portable systems where power efficiency is paramount, but the performance data indicates it sacrifices substantial multi-threaded capability to achieve that efficiency.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result in the head-to-head data is the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, where the Intel Core 5 315 scores 12981 versus the i5-14500T's 11790, a 10.1% advantage for the mobile chip. This is the only Cinebench multi-core test that the Core 5 315 wins, as the i5-14500T takes R15 multi-core (2022 vs 1308, 35.3% ahead) and R20 multi-core (8177 vs 5452, 33.3% ahead). The R23 result is counterintuitive given the i5-14500T's 14 cores and 20 threads versus the Core 5 315's 6 cores and 6 threads, but the data records it as a clear victory.

In single-core performance, the results are mixed. The i5-14500T wins Cinebench R15 single-core (252 vs 184, 27% ahead), R20 single-core (1154 vs 769, 33.4% ahead), and R23 single-core (1838 vs 1832, 0.3% ahead). The nearly identical R23 single-core scores suggest the two processors have comparable per-core capability in that workload. However, the PassMark single-thread test tells a different story: the Core 5 315 scores 4021 versus 3736 for the i5-14500T, a 7.6% advantage for the mobile chip. This divergence between Cinebench and PassMark single-thread results indicates the Core 5 315's architecture handles certain instruction patterns more efficiently.

The PassMark suite reveals the i5-14500T's dominance in data-heavy workloads. Data compression shows 262417 for the i5-14500T versus 146143 for the Core 5 315, a 44.3% gap. Data encryption records 15410 versus 11119, a 27.8% difference. Integer math is the largest gap at 60.8%, with 80922 versus 31690. Floating point math shows 58869 versus 42441, a 27.9% difference. The only PassMark test where the Core 5 315 wins besides single-thread is find prime numbers, where it scores 112 versus 81, a 38.3% advantage.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ substantially. The Core 5 315 has 6 cores and 6 threads, while the i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads. This 8-core and 14-thread difference explains much of the multi-threaded performance gap. The i5-14500T also has higher clock speeds, with a base of 1.70 GHz and boost of 4.80 GHz, compared to the Core 5 315's 1.50 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost.

The thermal design power (TDP) differs significantly: the Core 5 315 is rated at 15 W, while the i5-14500T is rated at 35 W. This reflects their different market segments, with the Core 5 315 designed for mobile systems using the Intel BGA 1516 socket, while the i5-14500T is a desktop processor using Intel Socket 1700. The memory support also differs, with the i5-14500T supporting DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, while the Core 5 315 supports only DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a single-channel configuration. The i5-14500T supports ECC memory, while the Core 5 315 does not.

Cache allocation varies between the two. The Core 5 315 has 192 KB of L1 cache, 2.5 MB of L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The i5-14500T has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The PCIe support also differs, with the i5-14500T offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core 5 315 offers Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only).

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations. The Core 5 315 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and is built on a 3 nm process node, while the i5-14500T uses the Raptor Lake-R codename and is built on a 10 nm process node. Despite the process difference, which typically indicates a newer design, the i5-14500T's Raptor Lake architecture is a refresh of the Raptor Lake design, as indicated by its generation label of "Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)".

The integrated graphics differ between the two. The Core 5 315 features Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, while the i5-14500T features UHD Graphics 770. The Core 5 315's graphics are part of its newer architecture, while the i5-14500T uses Intel's established UHD graphics line. The die size for the i5-14500T is recorded as 215 mm², while no die size is recorded for the Core 5 315.

The market segments differ fundamentally. The Core 5 315 is classified as a Mobile processor, while the i5-14500T is Desktop. The release dates also differ, with the i5-14500T released in January 2024 and the Core 5 315 released in April 2026. Both processors have locked multipliers, and neither supports overclocking. The part numbers are SAEFC for the Core 5 315 and SRN3P for the i5-14500T.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14500T wins in nearly every multi-threaded and data-intensive workload. Its 14 cores and 20 threads deliver decisive advantages in integer math (60.8% ahead), data compression (44.3% ahead), random string sorting (38.3% ahead), and multithread tests (33.3% ahead). The i5-14500T also wins all Cinebench R15 and R20 tests, both multi-core and single-core, along with Cinebench R23 single-core by a narrow 0.3% margin. The PassMark physics test also favors the i5-14500T, which scores 1288 versus 1163, a 9.7% difference. For users running video encoding, 3D rendering, scientific computing, or any workload that utilizes many threads, the i5-14500T is the superior choice based on the data.

The Intel Core 5 315 wins in a smaller set of workloads, but these wins are notable. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core victory (10.1% ahead) shows that the newer Wildcat Lake architecture can outperform the older Raptor Lake design in certain modern multi-threaded scenarios. The PassMark single-thread win (7.6% ahead) indicates the Core 5 315 has better per-thread performance in PassMark's testing methodology. The find prime numbers test shows a 38.3% advantage for the Core 5 315, which suggests its architecture handles certain mathematical operations more efficiently. The Core 5 315 also wins the data encryption test by 27.8%, a significant margin that indicates its cryptographic processing capability is strong despite its lower core count.

The use-case split is clear from the data. The i5-14500T is the choice for desktop systems where power consumption is less of a constraint and maximum performance across a wide range of tasks is required. The Core 5 315, with its 15 W TDP and mobile socket, is designed for laptops and portable devices, where its lower power draw and newer process node offer efficiency advantages. Users who prioritize single-threaded responsiveness or specific workloads like the R23 multi-core test may find the Core 5 315 adequate, but the overall benchmark data favors the i5-14500T for sheer computational throughput.