Intel Core 5 223PTE vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285 Comparison

Intel Core 5 223PTE and Intel Core Ultra 9 285 occupy different tiers in the desktop CPU market, and the recorded benchmark data confirms a wide performance gap. The Core Ultra 9 285 delivers substantially higher scores across all measured workloads, while the Core 5 223PTE has no benchmark entries in the database, so its performance can only be assessed through its specifications.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains benchmark results for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 only. The Core 5 223PTE has no recorded scores in any test, which prevents a direct head-to-head comparison. For the Core Ultra 9 285, the measurements show strong multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 48,945 points in the multi-core test and 6,909 points in the single-core test. The R20 results are 20,556 multi-core and 2,901 single-core, while R15 shows 4,933 multi-core and 696 single-core. These results place the processor at the 95th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

PassMark tests on the Core Ultra 9 285 reveal specific workload strengths. The data compression score is 602,121, data encryption is 46,949, and extended instructions reach 45,357. Floating point math scores 194,988, integer math scores 164,869, and the multi-thread test records 56,602. Single-thread performance is 4,881, and physics processing scores 3,598. Find prime numbers scores 459, and random string sorting scores 73,651. The average benchmark score is 75,488.

The nearest rivals for the Core Ultra 9 285, based on average scores, are all AMD processors. The AMD EPYC 8224P has an average score of 75,582, which is 0.1 percent lower, meaning the Core Ultra 9 285 trails by that margin. The AMD EPYC 4545P scores 75,373, putting the Intel part 0.2 percent ahead. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D scores 75,716, which is 0.3 percent higher than the Core Ultra 9 285, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 scores 75,738, also 0.3 percent higher. These deltas are small, indicating the Core Ultra 9 285 sits in a tightly contested performance band near the top of the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use fundamentally different designs. The Core 5 223PTE is built on a 10 nm process node at Intel, with 8 cores and 16 threads. Its codename is Bartlett Lake, and it belongs to the Core 5 generation. The Core Ultra 9 285 uses a 3 nm process node at TSMC, features 24 cores and 24 threads, and is based on the Arrow Lake architecture with the codename Arrow Lake-S, part of the Core Ultra Series 2.

The Core Ultra 9 285 has significantly more transistors, 17,800 million, and a die size of 243 mm², while the Core 5 223PTE has no recorded transistor count or die size in the database. Cache configurations differ as well. The Core 5 223PTE provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 9 285 has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, giving it larger cache capacities at every level.

Clock speeds show the Core Ultra 9 285 with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, while the Core 5 223PTE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The thermal design power differs, with the Core 5 223PTE rated at 45 watts and the Core Ultra 9 285 at 65 watts. The Core Ultra 9 285 also uses a different socket, Intel Socket 1851, compared to Intel Socket 1700 on the Core 5 223PTE.

Memory support separates the two as well. The Core 5 223PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel access and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Core Ultra 9 285 supports only DDR5, also dual-channel, with a higher bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. Both processors support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs, with the Core 5 223PTE offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Core Ultra 9 285 provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes.

Integrated graphics are present on both. The Core 5 223PTE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core Ultra 9 285 uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Core 5 223PTE has a release date of March 8, 2026, while the Core Ultra 9 285 was released on December 31, 2024.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has 24 cores, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores. The Core Ultra 9 285 also has 24 threads, whereas the Core 5 223PTE has 16 threads.

Q: Does the Core 5 223PTE support DDR4 memory?

Yes, the Core 5 223PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Core Ultra 9 285 supports only DDR5.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of each processor?

The Core 5 223PTE has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core Ultra 9 285 has a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: Are both processors manufactured by Intel?

Both processors are manufactured by Intel, but the Core Ultra 9 285 uses a 3 nm process node from TSMC, while the Core 5 223PTE uses a 10 nm node from Intel.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

The Core Ultra 9 285 has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, which is higher than the Core 5 223PTE's boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

Yes, both the Core 5 223PTE and the Core Ultra 9 285 support ECC memory.

The Verdict

The database places the Core Ultra 9 285 at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 75,488. Its nearest rivals are within 0.3 percent in either direction, confirming it sits at the top of the measured performance range. The Core 5 223PTE has no benchmark scores, but its specifications indicate a lower-tier part: fewer cores, smaller cache, lower memory bandwidth, and a lower boost clock.

The Core Ultra 9 285 is the clear choice for workloads that benefit from a high core count, larger cache, and higher memory throughput. Its 24 cores and 36 MB of L3 cache give it a structural advantage in multi-threaded tasks, and the recorded Cinebench and PassMark scores reflect that capability. The Core 5 223PTE, with 8 cores and 24 MB of L3 cache, targets a different performance class, and the data does not include any measurable results to suggest it competes with the Core Ultra 9 285.

Both processors share some features, including ECC memory support and Gen 5 PCIe connectivity, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Core 5 223PTE supports DDR4, which the Core Ultra 9 285 does not, making it a potential fit for systems with existing DDR4 memory. The Core Ultra 9 285 uses a newer 3 nm process node, which contributes to its higher transistor count of 17,800 million.

Specification Differences

The specifications that differ between the two processors are as follows:

• Cores: 8 on the Core 5 223PTE, 24 on the Core Ultra 9 285
• Threads: 16 on the Core 5 223PTE, 24 on the Core Ultra 9 285
• Base clock: 2.30 GHz on the Core 5 223PTE, 2.50 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285
• Boost clock: 5.40 GHz on the Core 5 223PTE, 5.60 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285
• TDP: 45 watts on the Core 5 223PTE, 65 watts on the Core Ultra 9 285
• Socket: Intel Socket 1700 on the Core 5 223PTE, Intel Socket 1851 on the Core Ultra 9 285
• Process node: 10 nm on the Core 5 223PTE, 3 nm on the Core Ultra 9 285
• Foundry: Intel on the Core 5 223PTE, TSMC on the Core Ultra 9 285
• Transistors: not recorded on the Core 5 223PTE, 17,800 million on the Core Ultra 9 285
• Die size: not recorded on the Core 5 223PTE, 243 mm² on the Core Ultra 9 285
• L1 cache: 80 KB per core on the Core 5 223PTE, 192 KB per core on the Core Ultra 9 285
• L2 cache: 2 MB per core on the Core 5 223PTE, 3 MB per core on the Core Ultra 9 285
• L3 cache: 24 MB shared on the Core 5 223PTE, 36 MB shared on the Core Ultra 9 285
• Memory support: DDR4 and DDR5 on the Core 5 223PTE, DDR5 only on the Core Ultra 9 285
• Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s on the Core 5 223PTE, 102.4 GB/s on the Core Ultra 9 285
• PCIe lanes: 16 on the Core 5 223PTE, 20 on the Core Ultra 9 285
• Integrated graphics: UHD Graphics 770 on the Core 5 223PTE, Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU on the Core Ultra 9 285
• Release date: March 8, 2026 on the Core 5 223PTE, December 31, 2024 on the Core Ultra 9 285
• Launch MSRP: $232 on the Core 5 223PTE, $579 on the Core Ultra 9 285

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 9 285 wins on every measured benchmark because it is the only one with recorded scores. Its multi-threaded results, such as the Cinebench R23 score of 48,945 and PassMark multi-thread score of 56,602, indicate it is suited for heavy parallel workloads like rendering or scientific computing. The single-thread score of 4,881 in PassMark and 6,909 in Cinebench R23 also shows strong per-core performance, giving it an advantage in tasks that rely on clock speed and cache.

The Core 5 223PTE has no benchmark wins in the database, but its specifications point to areas where it could be preferable in a system context. It supports DDR4 memory, which allows reuse of older memory modules, and its lower TDP of 45 watts suggests lower power draw than the Core Ultra 9 285's 65 watts. Its release date of March 8, 2026 is later, and its launch MSRP is $232 compared to $579.

For users with existing DDR4 platforms on Intel Socket 1700, the Core 5 223PTE fits that ecosystem. For users seeking maximum performance across all measured categories, the Core Ultra 9 285 is the processor with the data to back it up.