Intel Core 5 223PTE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core 5 223PTE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.3 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core Ultra 5 245KF

CORE STATE Arrow Lake-S
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 14 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4.2 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 125W
ARCHITECTURE Arrow Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
3,693
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
521
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
15,391
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
2,172
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
36,647
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
5,173
passmark_data_compression
N/A
460,123
passmark_data_encryption
N/A
33,381
passmark_extended_instructions
N/A
37,912
passmark_find_prime_numbers
N/A
416
passmark_floating_point_math
N/A
131,546
passmark_integer_math
N/A
98,854
passmark_multithread
N/A
43,110
passmark_physics
N/A
2,998
passmark_random_string_sorting
N/A
55,206
passmark_single_thread
N/A
4,715
passmark_singlethread
N/A
4,715

Analysis: Intel Core 5 223PTE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data shows a decisive advantage for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF across every measured workload. The Core Ultra 5 245KF records an average benchmark score of 55093, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core 5 223PTE, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile. This gap is not marginal; it is a complete sweep. Benchmark results indicate the Core Ultra 5 245KF delivers superior performance in both single-threaded and multithreaded applications.

Examining the Cinebench results for the Core Ultra 5 245KF provides a clear picture of its capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score reaches 36647, while the single-core score is 5173. The Cinebench R20 results show a multicore score of 15391 and a single-core score of 2172. The older Cinebench R15 test records a multicore score of 3693 and a single-core score of 521. These numbers indicate strong scaling across core counts and high per-core efficiency. The single-core results, in particular, confirm that the architecture delivers excellent instructions per clock, a critical factor for latency-sensitive tasks.

The Passmark suite reinforces this dominance. The Core Ultra 5 245KF achieves a multithread score of 43110 and a single-thread score of 4715. In specific workloads, the results are equally strong: integer math scores 98854, floating-point math scores 131546, and extended instructions score 37912. Data compression reaches 460123, while data encryption scores 33381. Random string sorting records 55206, and the find prime numbers test scores 416. Physics processing scores 2998. These figures demonstrate balanced performance across diverse computational tasks, from arithmetic throughput to memory-intensive operations.

The nearest rivals for the Core Ultra 5 245KF provide context for its standing. The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D records an average score of 54762, which is 0.6% lower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF. The Intel Core 7 253PQE scores 55919, which is 1.5% higher. The Intel Core i9-14900HX scores 56004, which is 1.6% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K scores 54053, which is 1.9% lower. These deltas show the Core Ultra 5 245KF operating in a tight competitive band, trading blows with high-end desktop and mobile processors, while the Core 5 223PTE has no comparable data to place it in the same conversation.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their underlying design. The Intel Core 5 223PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is built on Intel's 10 nm process node. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF uses the Arrow Lake architecture with the Arrow Lake-S codename and is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. This process difference is significant: the 3 nm node allows for denser transistor packing and improved power efficiency. The Core Ultra 5 245KF contains 17,800 million transistors on a die size of 243 mm², while the Core 5 223PTE has no recorded transistor count or die size in the database.

Core and thread configurations differ substantially. The Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, indicating hyperthreading support. The Core Ultra 5 245KF has 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning it does not use hyperthreading. Despite having fewer threads, the Core Ultra 5 245KF achieves far higher multithreaded scores, as the benchmark data shows. This suggests that the 14 physical cores on the newer architecture deliver more aggregate throughput than the 8 cores with 16 threads on the older design.

Clock speeds tell a nuanced story. The Core 5 223PTE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The Core Ultra 5 245KF has a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Core 5 223PTE has a higher peak boost, but the Core Ultra 5 245KF has a much higher base clock. The higher base clock on the Core Ultra 5 245KF contributes to sustained performance under load, while the lower base clock on the Core 5 223PTE means it relies heavily on boost behavior to reach competitive speeds.

Cache hierarchies also differ. The Core 5 223PTE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 245KF has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and the same 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger per-core L1 and L2 caches on the Core Ultra 5 245KF reduce memory latency and improve data locality, which contributes to its higher single-thread scores.

Memory support and PCIe connectivity reveal additional differences. The Core 5 223PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Core Ultra 5 245KF supports only DDR5 memory, also dual-channel, with a higher memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The Core 5 223PTE supports ECC memory, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF does not. For PCIe, the Core 5 223PTE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes. The extra PCIe lanes on the Core Ultra 5 245KF allow for more expansion devices or additional storage connectivity.

Integrated graphics also differentiate the two. The Core 5 223PTE includes UHD Graphics 770, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF has no integrated graphics, indicated as N/A. This means the Core 5 223PTE can operate without a discrete graphics card, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF requires one. The Core Ultra 5 245KF has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, while the Core 5 223PTE has a locked multiplier. Socket compatibility differs as well: the Core 5 223PTE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF uses Intel Socket 1851.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is the superior processor in every recorded performance category. Its average benchmark score of 55093 places it in the 91st percentile, while the Core 5 223PTE has no recorded scores and sits at the 50th percentile. For users prioritizing raw performance, the Core Ultra 5 245KF is the clear choice. The 14 cores, higher base clock, larger caches, and newer 3 nm process from TSMC all contribute to its dominance.

The Core 5 223PTE, however, serves a different purpose. Its 45 W TDP, compared to the 125 W TDP of the Core Ultra 5 245KF, indicates significantly lower power consumption. The Core 5 223PTE also includes integrated graphics, supports ECC memory, and works with DDR4 memory, making it suitable for systems where reliability, low power, or legacy memory compatibility are priorities. The 16 threads from 8 cores, despite the older architecture, still provide capable multithreaded performance for less demanding workloads.

For a user building a high-performance desktop, the data supports the Core Ultra 5 245KF. Its single-thread score of 4715 and multithread score of 43110 in Passmark, along with Cinebench R23 scores of 5173 single-core and 36647 multicore, demonstrate a level of performance that the Core 5 223PTE cannot approach. The unlocked multiplier on the Core Ultra 5 245KF adds further flexibility for enthusiasts.

For a user building a low-power system, an industrial PC, or a server that requires ECC memory, the Core 5 223PTE is the appropriate selection. The database shows no benchmark records for it, so its absolute performance cannot be quantified here, but its specifications indicate a processor designed for efficiency and stability rather than peak throughput. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 eliminates the need for a separate GPU, and the support for DDR4 memory reduces platform costs.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has 14 cores, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, which is higher than the 5.20 GHz boost clock of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF.

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 223PTE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core 5 223PTE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF does not support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE includes UHD Graphics 770. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF?

A: The average benchmark score is 55093, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: Which processor uses a 3 nm process node?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF uses a 3 nm process node manufactured by TSMC. The Intel Core 5 223PTE uses a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF wins decisively in all recorded benchmark categories. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36647 and single-core score of 5173 indicate top-tier performance for both heavily threaded rendering workloads and lightly threaded interactive tasks. The Passmark results confirm this across a range of applications: integer math at 98854, floating-point math at 131546, and extended instructions at 37912 all point to a processor that excels in computational density. The data compression score of 460123 and random string sorting score of 55206 show strong memory subsystem performance, likely benefiting from the larger L1 and L2 caches and the higher memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

The Core 5 223PTE has no recorded benchmark data, so its wins must be inferred from specifications. It wins in power efficiency, with a 45 W TDP versus 125 W for the Core Ultra 5 245KF. It wins in memory flexibility, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF supports only DDR5. It wins in ECC capability, which matters for error-sensitive computing environments. It wins in integrated graphics availability, as UHD Graphics 770 is present, whereas the Core Ultra 5 245KF requires a discrete GPU. It also has a higher boost clock at 5.40 GHz, although this does not translate into higher benchmark scores given the lack of data.

The socket situation also favors the Core 5 223PTE for users on an existing Intel Socket 1700 platform, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF requires the newer Intel Socket 1851. The Core Ultra 5 245KF has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, while the Core 5 223PTE does not. The Core Ultra 5 245KF also provides more PCIe lanes at 20 versus 16, which benefits systems with multiple GPUs, NVMe drives, or other expansion cards.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every specification field. The Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF has 14 cores and 14 threads. Base clocks are 2.30 GHz for the Core 5 223PTE and 4.20 GHz for the Core Ultra 5 245KF. Boost clocks are 5.40 GHz for the Core 5 223PTE and 5.20 GHz for the Core Ultra 5 245KF. TDP is 45 W for the Core 5 223PTE and 125 W for the Core Ultra 5 245KF.

Sockets differ: Intel Socket 1700 for the Core 5 223PTE and Intel Socket 1851 for the Core Ultra 5 245KF. The process node is 10 nm for the Core 5 223PTE and 3 nm for the Core Ultra 5 245KF. The foundry is Intel for the Core 5 223PTE and TSMC for the Core Ultra 5 245KF. The Core Ultra 5 245KF has 17,800 million transistors and a die size of 243 mm², while the Core 5 223PTE has no recorded values.

Cache configurations differ: L1 cache is 80 KB per core for the Core 5 223PTE and 192 KB per core for the Core Ultra 5 245KF. L2 cache is 2 MB per core for the Core 5 223PTE and 3 MB per core for the Core Ultra 5 245KF. Both share 24 MB of L3 cache. Memory support is DDR4 and DDR5 for the Core 5 223PTE and only DDR5 for the Core Ultra 5 245KF. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for the Core 5 223PTE and 102.4 GB/s for the Core Ultra 5 245KF. ECC memory is supported on the Core 5 223PTE but not the Core Ultra 5 245KF.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the Core 5 223PTE and Gen 5 with 20 lanes for the Core Ultra 5 245KF. The Core 5 223PTE includes UHD Graphics 770, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF has no integrated graphics. The multiplier is locked on the Core 5 223PTE and unlocked on the Core Ultra 5 245KF. The Core 5 223PTE has a part number of SA4QL and a release date of March 8, 2026, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF has a part number of SRQCY and a release date of October 23, 2024. The launch MSRP for the Core 5 223PTE is $232, and the launch MSRP for the Core Ultra 5 245KF is $294.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 223PTE
Ultra 5 245KF
Core Specs
Cores
8
14 +75.0%
Threads
16
14 -12.5%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.3
4.2 +82.6%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.4
5.2 -3.7%
Frequency (GHz)
2.3
4.2 +82.6%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.4
5.2 -3.7%
Multiplier
23
42 +82.6%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
24 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
45
125 +177.8%
PL1
45 W
159 W
PL2
219 W
159 W
Architecture
Architecture
—
Arrow Lake
Codename
Bartlett Lake
Arrow Lake-S
Generation
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)
Process Size
10 nm
3 nm
Transistors
—
17,800 million
Die Size
—
243 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
102.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
—
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel Socket 1851
Chipsets
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
Z890, B860, W880, Q870, H810
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
—
3.6 GHz up to 4.6 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
—
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$232
$294
Part Number
SA4QL
SRQCY
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-LGA18W
Tj Max
100°C
105°C
View Core 5 223PTE Details View Core Ultra 5 245KF Details