Intel Core 5 223PTE vs Intel Core i9-14901E Comparison
Intel Core 5 223PTE
Core i9-14901E
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 5 223PTE vs Intel Core i9-14901E
Intel Core 5 223PTE vs Intel Core i9-14901E
The benchmark data places the Intel Core i9-14901E firmly ahead of the Intel Core 5 223PTE across every recorded metric, though the comparison is limited by the fact that the database contains no benchmark scores for the Core 5 223PTE. The Core i9-14901E holds an average benchmark score of 37911, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 5 223PTE sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0. This single-sided data means the analysis must focus on what the Core i9-14901E delivers, how it compares to its nearest rivals, and what architectural differences explain the gap between the two Intel parts.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The Core i9-14901E shows a strong multi-core presence in Cinebench testing. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score reaches 25753, while the single-core score in the same test is 3635. These results indicate a balanced design that can handle both heavily threaded workloads and lighter, latency-sensitive tasks. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score drops to 10816 with a single-core score of 1526, and in Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 2595 with a single-core score of 366. The progression across these versions shows consistent scaling, with the R23 multi-core result roughly 2.4 times the R20 result, which is typical for the added workload complexity in the newer test version.
PassMark results for the Core i9-14901E further illustrate its capabilities. The multi-thread score is 30298, while the single-thread score is 4354. The integer math score of 112736 and floating point math score of 81089 show strong arithmetic throughput. Data compression scores hit 288777, while data encryption reaches 18571, and extended instructions score 17249. The physics score is 3041, and random string sorting completes at 39138. The find prime numbers score is 189, which is a comparatively modest result and suggests this workload type may not be the primary strength of this processor.
The nearest rivals to the Core i9-14901E provide context for these numbers. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904, a delta of 0 percent, meaning the two are statistically tied. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37943, which is 0.1 percent higher. The Intel Core 5 211E scores 37829, a 0.2 percent deficit relative to the Core i9-14901E. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37804, which is 0.3 percent lower. These deltas are all within one percent, so the Core i9-14901E effectively matches its closest competitors, with a slight edge over two of them and a negligible deficit to the Ryzen 7 9700X.
Architecture Differences
The two processors share a common foundation but differ in key architectural details. Both use the 10 nm process node from Intel, and both are built for the Intel Socket 1700. The Core i9-14901E is based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. The Core 5 223PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is listed as a Core 5 generation part. While the process node is identical, the architectural generation differs, which explains some of the performance separation.
Both chips feature 8 cores and 16 threads, so the core count does not account for the performance gap. The cache hierarchy is where the differences emerge. The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core, and the L2 cache is also the same at 2 MB per core. The L3 cache, however, is larger on the Core i9-14901E at 36 MB shared, compared to 24 MB shared on the Core 5 223PTE. That 12 MB difference in shared L3 cache likely contributes to the higher benchmark scores, as more data can reside closer to the cores.
Clock speeds also favor the Core i9-14901E. Its base clock is 2.80 GHz, and its boost clock reaches 5.60 GHz. The Core 5 223PTE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The higher base and boost clocks on the Core i9-14901E give it an advantage in both sustained and peak performance. The thermal design power also differs, with the Core i9-14901E rated at 65 TDP and the Core 5 223PTE at 45 TDP. The higher TDP on the Core i9-14901E allows it to maintain higher clocks under load, which is consistent with its superior benchmark results.
The Core i9-14901E also has a slightly larger die size at 257 mm², while the Core 5 223PTE has no recorded die size. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, and both support ECC memory. The Core 5 223PTE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core i9-14901E has no bandwidth figure in the database. Both use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and both integrate UHD Graphics 770. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not an option for either.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core i9-14901E boosts to 5.60 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE boosts to 5.40 GHz.
Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?
A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: Yes, both the Intel Core i9-14901E and the Intel Core 5 223PTE support ECC memory.
Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i9-14901E?
A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has an average benchmark score of 37911 and sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs.
Q: Are there any benchmark scores recorded for the Intel Core 5 223PTE?
A: No, the database contains no benchmark scores for the Intel Core 5 223PTE, and its average benchmark score is 0.
Q: Which processor has a higher TDP rating?
A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has a TDP of 65, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE has a TDP of 45.
Specification Differences
The recorded specifications show clear differences between the two processors. The base clock differs: 2.80 GHz on the Core i9-14901E versus 2.30 GHz on the Core 5 223PTE. The boost clock also differs: 5.60 GHz versus 5.40 GHz. The TDP is higher on the Core i9-14901E at 65, compared to 45 on the Core 5 223PTE. The L3 cache is larger on the Core i9-14901E at 36 MB, versus 24 MB on the Core 5 223PTE. The generation differs, with the Core i9-14901E listed as Core 14th Gen and the Core 5 223PTE as Core 5 (Bartlett Lake). The architecture is recorded as Raptor Lake for the Core i9-14901E, while the Core 5 223PTE has no architecture listed beyond its codename. The die size is 257 mm² for the Core i9-14901E, with no die size recorded for the Core 5 223PTE. The release dates differ, with the Core i9-14901E released in June 2024 and the Core 5 223PTE released in March 2026. The Core i9-14901E has a part number of Q49ESRNJH, while the Core 5 223PTE has a part number of SA4QL. The Core i9-14901E has a launch MSRP of $232, while the Core 5 223PTE has no launch MSRP listed. The memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for the Core 5 223PTE, with no figure recorded for the Core i9-14901E.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core i9-14901E is the clear winner in every benchmark category where data exists. Its multi-core performance, as shown by the Cinebench R23 score of 25753 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 30298, makes it suitable for heavily threaded workloads such as video rendering, scientific computing, and software compilation. The single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 3635 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4354, indicates strong responsiveness for general desktop use and lightly threaded applications. The high data compression score of 288777 and integer math score of 112736 suggest competence in file archiving and financial modeling. The 86th percentile ranking places it among the higher-performing CPUs in the database, and it effectively matches the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and AMD Ryzen 7 9700X, while slightly exceeding the Intel Core 5 211E and AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132.
The Intel Core 5 223PTE has no recorded benchmark scores, so it cannot claim any wins based on measured performance. Its lower TDP of 45 compared to 65 on the Core i9-14901E indicates it draws less power, which could be relevant for systems with stricter thermal or power budgets. Its lower base clock of 2.30 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz suggest it is positioned for efficiency rather than maximum performance. The smaller L3 cache of 24 MB versus 36 MB further reinforces this positioning. In the absence of benchmark data, the Core 5 223PTE's advantages are limited to its lower TDP and later release date in March 2026, which may indicate a more recent design iteration.
The Verdict
The data clearly favors the Intel Core i9-14901E for any performance-oriented use case. Its average benchmark score of 37911 places it in the 86th percentile, and its nearest rivals, all within 0.3 percent, confirm it is a competitive high-end part. The Core i9-14901E delivers strong multi-core and single-core results across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, along with robust PassMark scores in arithmetic, compression, and encryption. Users running CPU-intensive applications should choose the Core i9-14901E, as it has the measured performance to back that choice. The Intel Core 5 223PTE, with no benchmark scores in the database, cannot be recommended on the basis of measured performance. Its lower TDP and clocks suggest a more power-conscious design, but the lack of data means its capabilities are unverified. The Core i9-14901E is the only one of the two with evidence of performance, and that evidence is strong.