Intel Core 5 223PTE vs Intel Core i9-14900F Comparison

The Verdict

The Intel Core 5 223PTE and Intel Core i9-14900F target completely different segments of the desktop market. The i9-14900F is the clear performance leader, sitting at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the Core 5 223PTE sits at the 50th percentile. The data shows that the i9-14900F delivers massive multi-threaded performance with 24 cores and 32 threads, making it the obvious choice for heavy workloads. The Core 5 223PTE, with 8 cores and 16 threads, offers a lower-power alternative for users who do not need that extreme core count.

The i9-14900F carries a launch MSRP of $524, while the Core 5 223PTE has a launch MSRP of $232. The i9-14900F also has a higher boost clock of 5.80 GHz versus 5.40 GHz on the Core 5 223PTE, and more than double the L3 cache at 36 MB shared versus 24 MB shared. Users who need maximum multi-core throughput for rendering, compilation, or scientific workloads should pick the i9-14900F. Users who want a more modest 8-core processor with integrated graphics and a much lower launch MSRP should pick the Core 5 223PTE.

Where Each One Wins

The i9-14900F wins outright in every benchmark category where data exists. Its 24 cores and 32 threads provide a massive advantage in multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 demonstrates dominance in heavily parallelized workloads. Single-thread performance also favors the i9-14900F, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583 versus the Core 5 223PTE's lack of benchmark data.

The Core 5 223PTE wins in the power efficiency trade-off. Its 45 W TDP represents a significantly lower thermal envelope than the 65 W TDP of the i9-14900F. This makes the Core 5 223PTE more suitable for compact or lower-power systems. It also includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics, while the i9-14900F has no integrated graphics. This means the Core 5 223PTE can run a system without a discrete GPU, a capability the i9-14900F lacks entirely.

Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory. The Core 5 223PTE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the i9-14900F has no bandwidth figure recorded. Both use Intel Socket 1700 and offer PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Architecture Differences

The i9-14900F uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. The Core 5 223PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, also on Intel's 10 nm process, but belongs to the Core 5 generation. Both are manufactured by Intel.

The die size differs substantially. The i9-14900F has a die size of 257 mm², while no die size is recorded for the Core 5 223PTE. This larger die accommodates the i9's 24 cores and 32 threads, compared to the Core 5's 8 cores and 16 threads.

Cache hierarchy shows a key difference in L3 cache. Both processors provide 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core. The L3 cache differs: the i9-14900F offers 36 MB shared, while the Core 5 223PTE offers 24 MB shared. This 12 MB difference favors the i9 in workloads that benefit from larger shared cache pools.

The i9-14900F has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU for display output. The Core 5 223PTE includes UHD Graphics 770, enabling basic display functionality without a separate graphics card. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning they do not support unlocked overclocking. The i9-14900F was released on 2024-01-07, while the Core 5 223PTE has a release date of 2026-03-08.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F has 24 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The Core 5 223PTE includes UHD Graphics 770. The i9-14900F has no integrated graphics, so it requires a discrete GPU for video output.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The i9-14900F boosts to 5.80 GHz, while the Core 5 223PTE boosts to 5.40 GHz. The i9 has a 0.40 GHz higher boost clock.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Core 5 223PTE and the i9-14900F support ECC memory. Both also support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the TDP comparison?

A: The Core 5 223PTE has a TDP of 45 W, while the i9-14900F has a TDP of 65 W. The Core 5 runs at a lower thermal design power.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The i9-14900F has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 5 223PTE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors, and the Core 5 223PTE has no individual benchmark scores recorded. The i9-14900F, however, has extensive benchmark data that shows its performance profile.

In Cinebench R15, the i9-14900F scores 3986 in multi-core and 562 in single-core. The Cinebench R20 results show 16611 multi-core and 2344 single-core. The Cinebench R23 results are even more impressive: 39551 multi-core and 5583 single-core. These scores place the i9 at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Geekbench results for the i9-14900F show 20008 in multi-core and 2570 in single-core. PassMark results cover a range of specialized workloads. The multi-thread score is 46532, and the single-thread score is 4506. Data compression scores 564207, data encryption scores 34644, and extended instructions scores 31084. The i9 finds prime numbers with a score of 209, floating point math at 119550, integer math at 177066, physics at 2899, and random string sorting at 63728.

The average benchmark score for the i9-14900F is 60008. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with an average score of 60099 and a delta of -0.2%, the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX with 60104 and a delta of -0.2%, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D with 59641 and a delta of 0.6%, and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T with 60572 and a delta of -0.9%. This means the i9-14900F performs within 1% of these competing processors, effectively trading places with them across the recorded deltas.

The Core 5 223PTE has no benchmark scores, so direct numerical comparison is impossible from the recorded data. The percentile difference is stark: the i9 sits at the 92nd percentile versus the Core 5's 50th percentile. The Core 5's lower core count and lower boost clock indicate it will trail the i9 in multi-threaded workloads, but the lack of data prevents quantifying that gap.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 223PTE | Intel Core i9-14900F |

|----------------|---------------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 8 | 24 |

| Threads | 16 | 32 |

| Base Clock | 2.30 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.40 GHz | 5.80 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-R |

| Architecture | Not recorded | Raptor Lake |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 257 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB shared | 36 MB shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | N/A |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $232 | $524 |

| Part Number | SA4QL | SRN3W |

The base clock favors the Core 5 223PTE at 2.30 GHz versus 2.00 GHz on the i9, but the i9's higher boost clock of 5.80 GHz overtakes the Core 5's 5.40 GHz. The i9 more than triples the core count and doubles the thread count. The i9 also has 50% more L3 cache. The Core 5 has a lower TDP by 20 W and includes integrated graphics. Both processors share the same socket, process node, foundry, memory support, memory bus, PCIe configuration, and ECC support. Both have locked multipliers. The i9 was released over two years earlier and has a launch MSRP more than double that of the Core 5.