Intel Core 5 223PTE vs Intel Core i5-14400F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded benchmark scores for the Intel Core 5 223PTE, while the Intel Core i5-14400F has a substantial set of measurements across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests. The Core i5-14400F delivers an average benchmark score of 32279, placing it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs tracked in the database. The Core 5 223PTE holds a 50th percentile ranking, though without any recorded test scores, its performance cannot be directly quantified.

For the Core i5-14400F, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and single-core score of 3055 indicate a strong balance between threaded throughput and single-thread responsiveness. The Geekbench results follow a similar pattern: 11268 in multi-core and 2058 in single-core. Passmark tests show a multi-thread score of 25470 and a single-thread score of 3701, with integer math at 81524 and floating point math at 61319.

The nearest rivals to the Core i5-14400F are tightly clustered. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U scores 32233, which is 0.1% behind. The Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226, 0.2% behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 32354, putting it 0.2% ahead. The Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32121, 0.5% behind. These margins are narrow, meaning the Core i5-14400F sits in a highly competitive performance band.

Since the Core 5 223PTE has no benchmark entries, there are no wins recorded for either processor in head-to-head comparisons. The data cannot confirm any performance advantage for the newer Bartlett Lake part based on measured results. The Core i5-14400F, by contrast, has a complete performance profile that shows consistent results across every major benchmarking suite.

The absence of data for the Core 5 223PTE is notable. A 50th percentile placement suggests the database models its expected performance as average, but without actual test scores, this remains an estimate rather than a measurement. The Core i5-14400F, with its 83rd percentile ranking and verified scores, is the only one of the two with empirical evidence of its capabilities.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share the Intel Socket 1700 platform and both use a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. Both are desktop parts with active production status, dual-channel memory support for DDR4 and DDR5, and 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. ECC memory support is enabled on both. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The Core 5 223PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation. It has 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock is 2.30 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The Core i5-14400F belongs to the Core 14th Gen series with the Raptor Lake-R codename and Raptor Lake architecture. It has 10 cores and 16 threads, a base clock of 2.50 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The Core 5 223PTE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i5-14400F also has 80 KB of L1 per core, but only 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Bartlett Lake part therefore carries 60% more L2 per core and 4 MB more total L3.

The Core 5 223PTE includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, while the Core i5-14400F has no integrated graphics, as indicated by the N/A entry. This is a meaningful distinction for systems that rely on the CPU for display output. The Core 5 223PTE also lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core i5-14400F has no recorded memory bandwidth figure.

Thermal design power differs: the Core 5 223PTE is rated at 45 watts, the Core i5-14400F at 65 watts. The die size is recorded only for the Core i5-14400F at 215 mm². The release dates are separated by roughly two years: the Core i5-14400F launched on 2024-01-07, the Core 5 223PTE on 2026-03-08.

The part numbers are distinct as well. The Core 5 223PTE carries the SA4QL designation, while the Core i5-14400F uses SRN3RSRN47.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has 10 cores, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores. Both support 16 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Core 5 223PTE boosts to 5.40 GHz, which is 0.70 GHz higher than the Core i5-14400F's 4.70 GHz boost.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Core 5 223PTE and the Core i5-14400F have ECC memory support enabled.

Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?

A: The Core 5 223PTE includes UHD Graphics 770. The Core i5-14400F has no integrated graphics (N/A).

Q: How do the cache sizes compare?

A: The Core 5 223PTE has 2 MB of L2 per core and 24 MB of shared L3. The Core i5-14400F has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 20 MB of shared L3. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core.

Q: What is the thermal design power for each?

A: The Core 5 223PTE has a TDP of 45 watts. The Core i5-14400F has a TDP of 65 watts.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Core 5 223PTE | Intel Core i5-14400F |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Base Clock | 2.30 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.40 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-R |

| Architecture | Not specified | Raptor Lake |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Die Size | Not specified | 215 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not specified |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | N/A |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-01-07 |

| Part Number | SA4QL | SRN3RSRN47 |

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear choice for users who prioritize verified performance. The Intel Core i5-14400F has a complete set of benchmark results, an 83rd percentile ranking, and an average score of 32279. The Core 5 223PTE has no measured scores and sits at the 50th percentile, which is a modeled estimate rather than an empirical result.

The Core i5-14400F offers two additional cores, which contributes to its strong multi-threaded scores in Cinebench and Passmark. Its 65 watt TDP is higher than the 45 watt rating of the Core 5 223PTE, but the performance data justifies that power envelope. The Core 5 223PTE counters with a 0.70 GHz higher boost clock, larger L2 and L3 caches, integrated graphics, and a higher memory bandwidth figure, but none of these advantages are backed by benchmark measurements.

For systems that require integrated graphics, the Core 5 223PTE is the only option between the two, since the Core i5-14400F has none. For workloads that depend on multi-core throughput, the Core i5-14400F has demonstrated results that place it among comparable processors like the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and Intel Core i9-11900, with all four rivals within 0.5% of each other.

The Core 5 223PTE is a newer release with a more recent launch date, but the database contains no evidence of its actual performance. Until benchmark data is recorded, the Core i5-14400F remains the only processor in this comparison with quantifiable capabilities. Users who require integrated graphics must choose the Core 5 223PTE. Users who require proven performance data should select the Core i5-14400F.