Intel Core 5 223PTE vs Intel Core i5-110 Comparison

The two processors occupy different positions in Intel’s desktop lineup, and the recorded specifications show a clear split between multi-threaded capacity and single-thread responsiveness. The Intel Core 5 223PTE uses the Bartlett Lake architecture on a 10 nm process, while the Intel Core i5-110 relies on the older Comet Lake architecture on a 14 nm node. Both are active production parts, but the data indicates they target distinct use cases.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 223PTE wins in any workload that scales with core count and thread count. It provides 8 cores and 16 threads, compared to 6 cores and 12 threads on the Intel Core i5-110. That is 2 additional physical cores and 4 additional threads. For rendering, video encoding, compiling, or running multiple virtual machines, the extra parallel resources translate directly into higher throughput. The larger shared L3 cache, 24 MB versus 12 MB, also benefits workloads with large working sets that repeatedly access the same data.

The Intel Core i5-110 wins in scenarios where raw clock speed per core matters more than core count. Its base clock is 2.90 GHz, higher than the 2.30 GHz base on the Core 5 223PTE. For lightly threaded applications, such as older games, spreadsheets, or scripting, the higher base frequency gives an advantage when the workload cannot use more than a few threads. However, the boost clock tells a different story: the Core 5 223PTE reaches 5.40 GHz, while the i5-110 tops out at 4.30 GHz. That 1.10 GHz boost advantage means the Core 5 223PTE can pull ahead in single-thread bursts when the thermal and power envelope allows.

The socket separation reinforces the use-case split. The Core 5 223PTE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the i5-110 uses Intel Socket 1200. A system built around the newer socket will have access to PCIe Gen 5, 16 lanes from the CPU, and DDR5 memory support. The i5-110 is limited to PCIe Gen 3, 16 lanes, and DDR4 only. For users building a new machine, the Core 5 223PTE offers a forward-looking platform. For those upgrading an existing Socket 1200 system, the i5-110 is a drop-in option.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different architectural generations. The Core 5 223PTE is part of the Bartlett Lake generation, built on a 10 nm process. The i5-110 is a Comet Lake part, built on a 14 nm process. The process difference explains much of the power and efficiency gap. The 10 nm node allows the Core 5 223PTE to deliver a higher boost clock, 5.40 GHz, while maintaining a 45 W TDP. The 14 nm i5-110 has a 65 W TDP, which is 20 W higher, yet it only reaches a 4.30 GHz boost.

Cache structure differs substantially. The Core 5 223PTE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The i5-110 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The per-core L2 difference is significant: 2 MB versus 256 KB is an 8x gap. That larger L2 on the Core 5 223PTE reduces latency for frequently accessed data and improves performance in workloads with moderate working sets that fit within L2.

Memory support differs in both type and bandwidth. The Core 5 223PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The i5-110 supports only DDR4, also dual-channel, with a recorded bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. The Core 5 223PTE offers more than double the theoretical memory bandwidth. Applications that stream large datasets, such as data analytics or certain scientific simulations, will see a measurable benefit from the higher bandwidth.

ECC memory support is another differentiator. The Core 5 223PTE supports ECC memory, while the i5-110 does not. That makes the Core 5 223PTE suitable for entry-level servers, workstations, or NAS builds where data integrity is critical. The i5-110 lacks this capability, which limits its appeal in those same scenarios.

Integrated graphics also differ. The Core 5 223PTE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the i5-110 uses UHD Graphics 630. Both are integrated solutions, but the 770 generation is newer and pairs with the faster memory options on the Core 5 223PTE. For systems without a discrete GPU, the newer graphics engine provides a usable display output and basic media acceleration.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark scores for these two processors. The average benchmark score for both is listed as 0, and the nearest rivals arrays are empty. The percentile vs all CPUs for both is 50, which places them at the median of all recorded CPUs in the database, but without individual benchmark data, that percentile does not differentiate between them.

Given the lack of direct measurements, the comparison must rely on the specification differences. The core count difference, 8 versus 6, gives the Core 5 223PTE a theoretical 33% advantage in multi-threaded throughput, assuming perfect scaling. The thread count difference, 16 versus 12, provides a 33% increase in thread capacity as well. The L3 cache difference, 24 MB versus 12 MB, doubles the shared cache available to all cores.

The clock speed relationship is more nuanced. The i5-110 has a 0.60 GHz higher base clock, 2.90 GHz versus 2.30 GHz. That is a 26% higher base frequency. However, the Core 5 223PTE has a 1.10 GHz higher boost clock, 5.40 GHz versus 4.30 GHz, which is a 26% higher boost frequency as well. In practice, the sustained clock under load depends on power limits and cooling. The 45 W TDP on the Core 5 223PTE suggests it can hold its boost clock for longer periods without hitting thermal limits, while the 65 W TDP on the i5-110 indicates a higher power draw for lower peak performance.

Memory bandwidth is a clear win for the Core 5 223PTE. The recorded 89.6 GB/s is more than double the i5-110’s 42.7 GB/s. For memory-intensive workloads, this is a decisive advantage. The i5-110’s DDR4-only support caps its bandwidth, and the older memory controller cannot reach the higher speeds available on the newer platform.

The PCIe generation difference also favors the Core 5 223PTE. Gen 5 lanes provide higher transfer rates than Gen 3, which matters for fast NVMe storage or newer GPUs. The i5-110’s Gen 3 lanes are sufficient for older hardware but will bottleneck modern high-end components.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i5-110 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The Intel Core i5-110 has a boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports DDR5 memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The Intel Core i5-110 supports DDR4 only.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-110 support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-110 does not support ECC memory. The Intel Core 5 223PTE supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-110 has a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s.

Q: Which processor uses a newer manufacturing process?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE is built on a 10 nm process. The Intel Core i5-110 is built on a 14 nm process.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core 5 223PTE is the stronger processor for multi-threaded workloads and modern platform features. It offers 8 cores versus 6, 16 threads versus 12, double the L3 cache (24 MB versus 12 MB), a higher boost clock (5.40 GHz versus 4.30 GHz), wider memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s), DDR5 support, ECC support, and PCIe Gen 5. The 45 W TDP is lower than the i5-110’s 65 W TDP, while delivering a higher peak clock. Users who run parallel workloads, work with large datasets, or plan to use newer storage and graphics hardware should choose the Core 5 223PTE.

The Intel Core i5-110 retains an edge only in base clock speed, 2.90 GHz versus 2.30 GHz, and in its compatibility with the older Socket 1200 platform. For users with an existing Socket 1200 motherboard who do not want to change platforms, the i5-110 is the only option that fits. Its 6 cores and 12 threads remain sufficient for everyday productivity and light gaming, but the older 14 nm process, DDR4-only memory, and PCIe Gen 3 limit its headroom. The launch MSRP of the i5-110 is $200, while the Core 5 223PTE has a launch MSRP of $232.

The verdict is straightforward. The Core 5 223PTE wins on raw performance potential, power efficiency, and platform longevity. The i5-110 wins only on base clock and socket compatibility. For new builds, the Core 5 223PTE is the data-backed choice. For upgrades to an existing Socket 1200 system, the i5-110 is serviceable but represents an older generation with lower specifications across most categories.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 223PTE | Intel Core i5-110 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.30 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.40 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1200 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Comet Lake |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i5 (Comet Lake) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 42.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics 630 |

| Launch MSRP | $232 | $200 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2025-09-10 |

| Part Number | SA4QL | SA35X |

The specification table confirms the architectural gap. The Core 5 223PTE doubles the L2 cache per core, doubles the L3 cache, provides a newer process node, and offers a higher boost clock despite a lower TDP. The i5-110 has a higher base clock but falls behind in every other metric except socket compatibility. The database records show no direct benchmark scores, so the analysis rests on these documented specifications, which consistently favor the Core 5 223PTE for modern workloads.