Intel Core 5 223PTE vs Intel Core i3-14100F Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare between the Intel Core 5 223PTE and the Intel Core i3-14100F?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE provides 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i3-14100F provides 4 cores and 8 threads. The Core 5 223PTE doubles both counts.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE reaches a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, whereas the Intel Core i3-14100F boosts to 4.70 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 5 223PTE and the Intel Core i3-14100F support ECC memory.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache capacity?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core i3-14100F has 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 5 223PTE offers double the L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors use the same socket?

A: Yes, both processors use Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Does the Intel Core i3-14100F include integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core i3-14100F has no integrated graphics, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE includes UHD Graphics 770.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different generations within Intel's lineup. The Intel Core 5 223PTE belongs to the Bartlett Lake generation and is built on a 10 nm process node. The Intel Core i3-14100F belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, with the codename Raptor Lake-R, also on a 10 nm process node. Both are manufactured by Intel.

The core configurations differ substantially. The Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, which indicates support for simultaneous multithreading across all cores. The Core i3-14100F has 4 cores and 8 threads, also supporting multithreading but with half the core count. The Core 5 223PTE lists a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while the Core i3-14100F has a higher base clock of 3.50 GHz but a lower boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The lower base clock with a much higher boost clock on the Core 5 223PTE suggests a design that can scale up aggressively under load.

Cache hierarchies show a notable difference in L2 and L3 capacities. The Core 5 223PTE uses 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i3-14100F uses 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core for both processors.

The Core 5 223PTE has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Core i3-14100F has a TDP of 58 watts. Despite having more cores and more cache, the Core 5 223PTE is rated for lower power consumption. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Core 5 223PTE lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core i3-14100F does not have a recorded memory bandwidth figure in the database.

Both use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Core 5 223PTE includes UHD Graphics 770 as integrated graphics, while the Core i3-14100F has no integrated graphics. The Core 5 223PTE has a die size that is not recorded, whereas the Core i3-14100F has a die size of 163 mm². Both are desktop market segments, are currently active in production, and have locked multipliers.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Core 5 223PTE and the Intel Core i3-14100F. The Core 5 223PTE has no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile versus all CPUs is 50.

The Core i3-14100F has a full set of benchmark scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark tests. Its average benchmark score is 18519, and it sits at the 72nd percentile versus all CPUs. In the absence of direct measurements for the Core 5 223PTE, the recorded data cannot establish a score-by-score comparison. The Core i3-14100F's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i5-13420H with an average score of 18511 and a delta of 0%, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE with an average score of 18505 and a delta of 0.1%, the Intel Core i3-13100 with an average score of 18380 and a delta of 0.8%, and the Intel Core 7 360 with an average score of 18374 and a delta of 0.8%. These rival comparisons place the Core i3-14100F in a tight cluster with other mid-range desktop and mobile processors.

The Core i3-14100F's individual scores show its strengths. In Cinebench R23, it scores 13084 in multicore and 1847 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5495 in multicore and 775 in single-core. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1318 in multicore and 186 in single-core. Geekbench results show 7598 in multicore and 2105 in single-core. PassMark tests indicate 15420 in multithread performance and 3778 in single-thread performance. Specific PassMark workloads include integer math at 45357, floating point math at 35370, data compression at 176106, data encryption at 8922, extended instructions at 11984, find prime numbers at 61, physics at 1077, and random string sorting at 17596.

Without benchmark scores for the Core 5 223PTE, the head-to-head comparison relies on architectural specifications rather than measured performance. The Core 5 223PTE's larger core count, larger L3 cache, and higher boost clock suggest a capability advantage in multi-threaded workloads, but the recorded data does not quantify that advantage. The Core i3-14100F's higher base clock and established benchmark results indicate strong single-thread performance relative to its class, but direct comparisons to the Core 5 223PTE cannot be made from the available data.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 223PTE | Intel Core i3-14100F |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 8 | 4 |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.30 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.40 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 58 W |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i3 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 163 mm² |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | N/A |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $232 | $109 |

| Part Number | SA4QL | SRMX2 |

The two processors share several specifications. Both use Intel Socket 1700, a 10 nm process node, dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, and are desktop processors with active production status. Both have locked multipliers.

The differences are concentrated in core count, clock speeds, cache, power rating, integrated graphics, and release timing. The Core 5 223PTE releases later, includes integrated graphics, and carries a higher launch MSRP of $232. The Core i3-14100F has a launch MSRP of $109.

The Verdict

The recorded data positions the Intel Core i3-14100F as a measured performer with a complete benchmark profile and a 72nd percentile ranking. Its average benchmark score of 18519 places it among comparable processors like the Intel Core i5-13420H, AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE, Intel Core i3-13100, and Intel Core 7 360, all within a 0.8% delta. The Core i3-14100F is a verified quantity in the database.

The Intel Core 5 223PTE has no benchmark scores recorded and a 50th percentile ranking. Its specifications, including 8 cores, 16 threads, 24 MB of L3 cache, and a 5.40 GHz boost clock, indicate a more capable multi-threaded architecture than the Core i3-14100F. Its lower TDP of 45 watts compared to 58 watts reinforces a design focused on efficiency alongside performance. The presence of UHD Graphics 770 also gives it a functional advantage for systems without a discrete GPU.

For users relying on measured performance data, the Core i3-14100F is the only one of the two with recorded scores. It delivers a strong single-thread score of 3778 in PassMark and a multicore score of 15420 in PassMark, with Cinebench R23 results of 13084 multicore and 1847 single-core. These results confirm its standing as a capable 4-core processor.

For users prioritizing core count, cache capacity, boost clock, and integrated graphics, the Core 5 223PTE offers the stronger specification sheet. The absence of benchmark data means its real-world performance is not yet quantified, but the architectural advantages are clear in the recorded fields.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 223PTE wins on multi-threaded capability. Its 8 cores and 16 threads double the thread count of the Core i3-14100F. Its 24 MB of shared L3 cache doubles the 12 MB found on the Core i3-14100F. Its 5.40 GHz boost clock exceeds the Core i3-14100F's 4.70 GHz. These factors point to a processor designed for heavier workloads that can use additional cores and cache.

The Intel Core 5 223PTE wins on power efficiency. Its 45 watt TDP is lower than the 58 watt TDP of the Core i3-14100F, despite having more cores and more cache. This suggests a more power-conscious design in the Bartlett Lake generation.

The Intel Core 5 223PTE wins on integrated graphics. It includes UHD Graphics 770, while the Core i3-14100F has no integrated graphics. Systems built around the Core 5 223PTE do not require a discrete GPU for display output.

The Intel Core i3-14100F wins on verified performance data. The database contains 19 benchmark scores for the Core i3-14100F, covering Cinebench R15, R20, R23, Geekbench, and PassMark suites. The Core 5 223PTE has no recorded scores. The Core i3-14100F's 72nd percentile ranking versus all CPUs confirms its measured standing.

The Intel Core i3-14100F wins on base clock. Its 3.50 GHz base clock is higher than the Core 5 223PTE's 2.30 GHz. This indicates the Core i3-14100F maintains a higher frequency at idle and light loads.

The Intel Core i3-14100F wins on measured single-thread performance. Its PassMark single-thread score is 3778, and its Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1847. Without comparable scores for the Core 5 223PTE, the Core i3-14100F holds the only recorded single-thread results.

The Intel Core i3-14100F wins on release timing. It was released on 2024-01-07, while the Core 5 223PTE was released on 2026-03-08. The Core i3-14100F has been available for a longer period.