Intel Core 5 223PTE vs Intel Core 7 240H Comparison

# FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core 5 223PTE and Intel Core 7 240H?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE features 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 7 240H features 10 cores and 16 threads. Despite having fewer physical cores, the Core 5 223PTE matches the thread count of the Core 7 240H due to its thread configuration.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE boosts up to 5.40 GHz, whereas the Intel Core 7 240H boosts up to 5.20 GHz. The Core 5 223PTE holds a 0.20 GHz advantage in maximum boost frequency.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the memory bandwidth for the Intel Core 7 240H is not recorded in the database. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Core 5 223PTE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 7 240H does not list ECC memory support.

Q: What integrated graphics do these processors use?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Intel Core 7 240H uses Iris Xe Graphics 64EU.

Q: How do the two processors compare in terms of market segment?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE is a desktop processor, and the Intel Core 7 240H is a mobile processor. They also use different sockets: Intel Socket 1700 for the Core 5 223PTE and Intel BGA 1744 for the Core 7 240H.

# Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 5 223PTE belongs to the Bartlett Lake generation and is built on a 10 nm process node by Intel. Its architecture is not explicitly listed in the database, but its codename is Bartlett Lake. It is a desktop part using Intel Socket 1700. The processor has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 5 223PTE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory support is enabled. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics come in the form of UHD Graphics 770. The processor is not multiplier unlocked and carries the part number SA4QL.

The Intel Core 7 240H belongs to the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H codename, and is part of the Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. It is also built on a 10 nm process node by Intel. This is a mobile processor using Intel BGA 1744. It has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy mirrors the Core 5 223PTE: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, but the database does not record a memory bandwidth figure for this part. ECC memory support is not listed. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics 64EU. The processor is not multiplier unlocked and carries the part number SRQ6TQ5ML.

The major architectural distinction is the platform: the Core 5 223PTE is a desktop chip on Socket 1700, while the Core 7 240H is a mobile chip on BGA 1744. The Core 7 240H has two additional physical cores, but both parts present 16 threads. The Core 5 223PTE has a higher boost clock by 0.20 GHz and a lower base clock by 0.20 GHz. The Core 5 223PTE also has more PCIe lanes from the CPU (16 versus 8) and ECC memory support, which the Core 7 240H lacks. Both share the same L3 cache capacity at 24 MB, and both use the same process node and foundry.

# The Verdict

The data indicates a clear split by use case. The Intel Core 5 223PTE is the desktop-oriented choice, with a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz, ECC memory support, and a wider PCIe Gen 5 implementation with 16 CPU lanes. These characteristics suit static, socketed environments where memory reliability and expansion bandwidth matter. The Intel Core 7 240H is the mobile part, offering 10 cores versus 8, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The extra two cores provide additional parallel processing capacity for multi-threaded workloads, and the lower boost clock reduces peak frequency demand, which fits mobile thermal constraints.

Benchmark data in the database covers only the Intel Core 7 240H. It records an average benchmark score of 31483, with a percentile of 82 against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 3 205 with an average score of 31473, the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX with 31495, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H with 31508, and the Intel Core i5-13500 with 31510. The Core 7 240H essentially matches these parts, with delta percentages of 0, 0, -0.1, and -0.1. For the Core 5 223PTE, no benchmark scores or nearest rivals are recorded, so direct performance comparison is not possible from the database.

Given the available data, the Core 7 240H is the part with recorded performance validation and a strong percentile placement. The Core 5 223PTE offers platform features that the Core 7 240H does not: ECC memory, more PCIe lanes, and a higher boost frequency. Users requiring a desktop socketed processor with ECC and broader PCIe connectivity should select the Core 5 223PTE. Users needing a mobile processor with more physical cores and verified benchmark standing should select the Core 7 240H.

# Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several recorded specifications.

• Cores: The Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores; the Core 7 240H has 10 cores.
• Threads: Both have 16 threads.
• Base Clock: The Core 5 223PTE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz; the Core 7 240H has a base clock of 2.50 GHz.
• Boost Clock: The Core 5 223PTE boosts to 5.40 GHz; the Core 7 240H boosts to 5.20 GHz.
• Socket: The Core 5 223PTE uses Intel Socket 1700; the Core 7 240H uses Intel BGA 1744.
• Architecture: The Core 5 223PTE lists Bartlett Lake as its codename; the Core 7 240H lists Raptor Lake as its architecture and Raptor Lake-H as its codename.
• Generation: The Core 5 223PTE is in the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation; the Core 7 240H is in the Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation.
• Memory Bandwidth: The Core 5 223PTE records 89.6 GB/s; the Core 7 240H has no recorded memory bandwidth.
• ECC Memory: The Core 5 223PTE supports ECC; the Core 7 240H does not.
• PCIe Lanes: The Core 5 223PTE has Gen 5, 16 lanes from the CPU; the Core 7 240H has Gen 5, 8 lanes from the CPU.
• Integrated Graphics: The Core 5 223PTE uses UHD Graphics 770; the Core 7 240H uses Iris Xe Graphics 64EU.
• Market Segment: The Core 5 223PTE is a desktop part; the Core 7 240H is a mobile part.
• Release Date: The Core 5 223PTE was released on 2026-03-08; the Core 7 240H was released on 2024-12-17.
• Launch MSRP: The Core 5 223PTE has a launch MSRP of $232; the Core 7 240H has a launch MSRP of $502.
• Part Number: The Core 5 223PTE is SA4QL; the Core 7 240H is SRQ6TQ5ML.

Fields that are the same include process node (10 nm), foundry (Intel), L1 cache (80 KB per core), L2 cache (2 MB per core), L3 cache (24 MB shared), memory support (DDR4, DDR5), memory bus (dual-channel), multiplier unlocked status (false), and production status (Active). The Core 7 240H has a higher base clock by 0.20 GHz, while the Core 5 223PTE has a higher boost clock by 0.20 GHz.

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors. The wins counters list 0 for both, and the head-to-head benchmarks array is empty. Consequently, a direct benchmark comparison cannot be drawn from recorded measurements.

However, the Core 7 240H has a full benchmark suite recorded. Its Cinebench R15 multicore score is 2360, and its single-core score is 249. In Cinebench R20, it scores 8562 multicore and 1208 single-core. Cinebench R23 results show 15764 multicore and 1719 single-core. PassMark results include multithread at 23975, single-thread at 3782, data compression at 271774, data encryption at 15155, extended instructions at 16897, find prime numbers at 102, floating-point math at 58905, integer math at 80396, physics at 1723, and random string sorting at 28866. The average benchmark score is 31483.

The Core 5 223PTE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile against all CPUs is 50. The Core 7 240H, by contrast, sits at the 82nd percentile against all CPUs. Without measured scores for the Core 5 223PTE, any comparison of raw performance is impossible from the database.

The nearest rivals for the Core 7 240H provide context for its standing. The AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX records an average score of 31495, a 0 percent delta from the Core 7 240H. The Intel Core Ultra 3 205 records 31473, also 0 percent. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H records 31508, a -0.1 percent delta, meaning it is essentially tied with a slightly higher score. The Intel Core i5-13500 records 31510, also -0.1 percent. These figures place the Core 7 240H in a tight cluster where no meaningful performance separation exists among these rivals.

# Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 240H wins in any scenario that relies on recorded benchmark validation. Its average benchmark score of 31483 and 82nd percentile placement give it a verified performance profile. The 10-core configuration provides additional physical cores over the 8-core Core 5 223PTE, which can benefit heavily parallel workloads such as rendering, encoding, and scientific computation. Its mobile form factor, using Intel BGA 1744, makes it suitable for laptops and compact systems where the desktop Socket 1700 layout is not an option.

The Intel Core 5 223PTE wins in platform-level features. It offers ECC memory support, which the Core 7 240H does not. ECC capability matters for data-integrity-sensitive applications such as file servers, database hosts, and long-running computation tasks. It also provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, double the 8 lanes of the Core 7 240H. This allows more direct high-speed device connections, such as multiple NVMe storage devices or expansion cards, without routing through the chipset. The higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz gives the Core 5 223PTE a frequency advantage in lightly threaded workloads, assuming the application can scale to that boost state.

For desktop builders who need a socketed processor with ECC and extensive PCIe connectivity, the Core 5 223PTE is the appropriate selection. For mobile users or those who prioritize a validated multicore benchmark record and additional physical cores, the Core 7 240H is the appropriate selection. The Core 5 223PTE also carries a lower launch MSRP of $232 compared to the Core 7 240H at $502, though pricing considerations should not be the sole factor in a technical comparison. The Core 7 240H has a higher base clock of 2.50 GHz versus 2.30 GHz, which may provide a steady-state performance advantage in sustained workloads that do not reach boost frequencies. The Core 5 223PTE has a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz versus 5.20 GHz, which may provide a peak performance advantage in short, bursty workloads. Neither processor is multiplier unlocked, so overclocking is not a differentiating factor. Both share the same L3 cache size at 24 MB, so cache-sensitive workloads will not see a capacity difference. Both use the same 10 nm process and Intel foundry, so fabrication characteristics are equal. The integrated graphics differ, with UHD Graphics 770 on the Core 5 223PTE and Iris Xe Graphics 64EU on the Core 7 240H, which may matter for systems without a discrete GPU. The release dates differ by over a year, with the Core 7 240H released on 2024-12-17 and the Core 5 223PTE released on 2026-03-08, indicating a later product introduction for the desktop part. Both processors are active in production status.