Intel Core 5 223PTE vs Intel Core 5 320 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Core 5 223PTE, as that processor has no benchmark scores listed in the database. The Intel Core 5 320, by contrast, has a comprehensive set of measured results across Cinebench and Passmark tests. The Intel Core 5 320 achieves an average benchmark score of 18023, placing it at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs tracked in the database. Its nearest rivals demonstrate a tightly clustered competitive field: the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 scores 17994, putting the Core 5 320 just 0.2% ahead; the Intel Core i5-1334U scores 18154, meaning the Core 5 320 trails by 0.7%; the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT scores 17891, with the Core 5 320 ahead by 0.7%; and the Intel Core 5 120U scores 17898, again with the Core 5 320 ahead by 0.7%.

The Core 5 320's single-thread performance is a clear strength. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 1926 points, which translates into a Passmark single-thread score of 4045. The Cinebench R20 single-core result of 771 and the R15 single-core result of 276 both reinforce this pattern: the chip delivers strong per-thread throughput that positions it favorably against its nearest rivals in the database. These single-core figures are particularly notable given that the Core 5 320 is a 6-thread part, meaning its per-core efficiency must carry much of its workload performance.

Multi-core results show a more modest picture. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 6197, which is roughly 3.2 times its single-core score of 1926, indicating that the 6 threads scale reasonably but not exceptionally under full load. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5462 and R15 multi-core score of 1054 follow the same pattern. The Passmark multithread score of 15450, combined with a single-thread score of 4045, yields a scaling ratio of approximately 3.8, suggesting that the processor extracts most of the available parallelism from its 6 threads without hyperthreading.

In specialized Passmark workloads, the Core 5 320 shows distinctive strengths. Data compression scores 148779, floating point math scores 42440, and integer math scores 32323. Extended instructions score 13262, random string sorting scores 18038, and data encryption scores 10984. Physics simulation scores 1221, while find prime numbers scores 110. These results indicate the chip handles compression and math-heavy tasks well, while the low prime-number score suggests certain integer-heavy loops are not its forte.

Architecture Differences

The two processors sit on opposite ends of Intel's design spectrum. The Intel Core 5 223PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation. It is built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry. The Intel Core 5 320 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) generation. It is built on a 3 nm process node, also at Intel's foundry. The process node difference is substantial: the 10 nm node versus the 3 nm node represents a significant generational leap in transistor density and power efficiency.

The core configurations differ sharply. The 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, meaning it supports simultaneous multithreading. The 320 has 6 cores and 6 threads, with no hyperthreading support. This means the 223PTE can process twice as many threads as it has physical cores, while the 320 processes exactly one thread per core. The 223PTE's base clock is 2.30 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while the 320's base clock is 1.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The 223PTE's boost advantage of 0.80 GHz is notable for burst workloads.

Cache hierarchies also differ substantially. The 223PTE provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The 320 provides 192 KB of L1 cache, 2.5 MB of L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The 223PTE's L3 cache is four times larger, which benefits workloads with large working sets. The 320's L1 cache is larger per core, and its L2 cache is larger per core, which can help with latency-sensitive single-threaded tasks.

Memory support diverges completely. The 223PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory support. The 320 supports only DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a single-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s and no ECC support. The 223PTE's dual-channel configuration offers 50% more theoretical memory bandwidth than the 320's single-channel design. PCIe connectivity also differs: the 223PTE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the 320 provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The 223PTE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the 320 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The 320's newer graphics architecture reflects its more recent process node, though the database does not include graphics benchmarks for either part. The 223PTE uses the Intel Socket 1700 and targets the desktop market segment, while the 320 uses Intel BGA 1516 and targets the mobile segment. Both processors are active in production and both have locked multipliers.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 223PTE wins on raw multi-threaded capacity. Its 16 threads versus the 320's 6 threads gives it a 10-thread advantage that directly benefits heavily parallel workloads such as video rendering, compilation, and database operations. The 223PTE's dual-channel memory subsystem with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, versus the 320's 59.7 GB/s single-channel bus, provides 30 GB/s more bandwidth for memory-intensive tasks. The 223PTE's 24 MB of shared L3 cache, four times the 320's 6 MB, reduces memory pressure for large data sets. Its boost clock of 5.40 GHz, 0.80 GHz higher than the 320's 4.60 GHz, gives it an edge in short bursts of single-threaded activity. ECC memory support makes the 223PTE appropriate for reliability-sensitive workloads.

The Intel Core 5 320 wins on efficiency and per-core performance. Its 3 nm process node versus the 223PTE's 10 nm node delivers dramatically better power efficiency, reflected in its 15 W TDP versus the 223PTE's 45 W TDP. The 320's L1 cache of 192 KB and L2 cache of 2.5 MB, both larger per core than the 223PTE's 80 KB and 2 MB, support latency-sensitive single-threaded execution. The 320's measured single-thread score of 4045 in Passmark, achieved despite a lower 4.60 GHz boost clock, suggests its newer architecture extracts more work per clock. The 320's mobile form factor with BGA 1516 packaging and LPDDR5X memory support makes it suitable for compact systems where the 223PTE's Socket 1700 desktop platform would not fit.

The 320's benchmark data shows it competes effectively with older desktop parts. Its average score of 18023 places it within 0.7% of the Intel Core i5-1334U and ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 by 0.2% and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT by 0.7%. This positioning indicates the 320 delivers desktop-class throughput in a mobile envelope. The 223PTE has no benchmark data in the database, so its direct measured performance cannot be compared. The 320's 72nd percentile ranking among all CPUs versus the 223PTE's 50th percentile ranking suggests the 320 sits higher in the overall performance distribution, though this percentile comparison relies on different data availability.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on workload and platform requirements. For users who need maximum multi-threading and memory bandwidth in a desktop system, the Intel Core 5 223PTE is the appropriate choice. Its 16 threads, dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, 24 MB L3 cache, and 5.40 GHz boost clock align with demanding parallel workloads. The 45 W TDP and Socket 1700 platform indicate a conventional desktop deployment where power is less constrained. The 223PTE's ECC memory support adds reliability features that the 320 lacks.

For users who need strong single-thread performance and efficiency in a mobile or compact system, the Intel Core 5 320 is the data-supported pick. Its measured benchmark scores confirm competitive performance: 1926 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 4045 in Passmark single-thread, and an average score of 18023 that places it at the 72nd percentile. The 320's 3 nm process and 15 W TDP deliver the efficiency profile of a modern mobile processor. Its larger per-core L1 and L2 caches support responsive single-threaded execution. The 320's single-channel memory and 6 MB L3 cache are limitations for memory-intensive parallel workloads, but its benchmark results show it handles general-purpose tasks well.

The choice between these processors is fundamentally a platform decision. The 223PTE requires a Socket 1700 motherboard, accepts DDR4 or DDR5, and provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for expansion. The 320 requires a BGA 1516 board, uses DDR5 or LPDDR5X, and provides 6 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The 223PTE's launch MSRP is $232, while the 320's launch MSRP is $340. The 320's higher launch MSRP reflects its newer process node and mobile integration. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a differentiator.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 5 320 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The 223PTE supports simultaneous multithreading, doubling its thread count over its physical core count.

Q: What are the process nodes for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE is built on a 10 nm process node, while the Intel Core 5 320 is built on a 3 nm process node. Both are manufactured at Intel's foundry.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core 5 320 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Core 5 223PTE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 5 320 does not.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core 5 320?

A: The Intel Core 5 320 has an average benchmark score of 18023 and sits at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 5 320 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 223PTE | Intel Core 5 320 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 2.30 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.40 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 15 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Wildcat Lake |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Launch MSRP | $232 | $340 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | SA4QL | SAE3H |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2026-04-15 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 72 |