Intel Core 5 223PE vs Intel Processor N150 Comparison

Intel Core 5 223PE vs Intel Processor N150: the data records a decisive 4 to 0 benchmark sweep for the desktop part, with the Core 5 223PE dominating every recorded test by margins ranging from 145.5% to 921.2%. The N150 is positioned in the 28th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 5 223PE sits in the 87th percentile, placing them in entirely different performance strata.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 223PE wins every category where benchmark data exists. In multi-core workloads, the advantage is overwhelming. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows a 921.2% lead, and Cinebench R15 multi-core shows a 531% lead. These are not incremental differences; the Core 5 223PE completes heavily threaded rendering tasks in a fraction of the time required by the N150.

Single-core performance also belongs to the Core 5 223PE, though the gap is comparatively smaller. Cinebench R23 single-core shows a 299.4% advantage, and Cinebench R15 single-core shows a 145.5% advantage. This suggests the Core 5 223PE's higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz versus the N150's 3.60 GHz provides a substantial per-thread advantage, critical for lightly threaded applications and responsive system interaction.

The Intel Processor N150 records zero wins in the head-to-head data. Its role is defined by other characteristics: a 6 W TDP versus 65 W, a single-channel memory bus, and a mobile BGA 1264 socket. The data shows no workload where the N150 outperforms the Core 5 223PE, meaning its selection is based entirely on power envelope and platform requirements rather than performance.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in design. The Core 5 223PE is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700, built on the Bartlett Lake codename with a Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation label. It uses 8 cores and 16 threads, effectively doubling the N150's 4 cores and 4 threads. The N150 uses the Twin Lake architecture, labeled as Intel Processor (Alder Lake-N), and sits in a mobile BGA 1264 package.

Both use a 10 nm process node from Intel, but their cache hierarchies differ substantially. The Core 5 223PE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The N150 has 96 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of shared L2, and only 6 MB of shared L3. The Core 5 223PE's larger shared L3 cache provides a significant advantage for data reuse across its 16 threads.

Memory architecture separates the two clearly. The Core 5 223PE supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The N150 supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 but only in a single-channel configuration with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth. The Core 5 223PE also supports ECC memory, which the N150 does not. PCIe connectivity differs as well: Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the Core 5 223PE, Gen 3 with 9 lanes for the N150.

The integrated graphics are identical on paper: both use UHD Graphics 730. The Core 5 223PE targets the Desktop market segment, while the N150 is a Mobile part. The Core 5 223PE released on 2026-03-08 with a launch MSRP of $232, while the N150 released on 2024-11-19 with no launch MSRP recorded.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench R23 multi-core test delivers the largest recorded gap. The Core 5 223PE scores 26455 against the N150's 2590.5, a 921.2% difference. This result reflects the combined effect of twice the cores, twice the threads, a larger L3 cache, and dual-channel memory bandwidth. The N150's 2590.5 score falls below what the Core 5 223PE achieves with a single thread in the same test (3734), meaning the N150's entire multi-core throughput is less than one core of the Core 5 223PE.

Cinebench R15 multi-core shows a similar pattern with a 531% lead: 2666 for the Core 5 223PE versus 422.5 for the N150. The N150's score here is roughly one-seventh of the Core 5 223PE's output.

Single-core results show a narrower but still commanding gap. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Core 5 223PE scores 3734 against 935 for the N150, a 299.4% advantage. The boost clock difference of 5.20 GHz versus 3.60 GHz explains a large portion of this gap, as does the Core 5 223PE's higher base clock of 2.90 GHz versus the N150's 0.10 GHz base clock.

Cinebench R15 single-core records 376 for the Core 5 223PE and 153.15 for the N150, a 145.5% lead. This is the smallest relative margin in the head-to-head set, but it still represents a substantial per-thread performance advantage.

The average benchmark scores confirm the overall positioning. The Core 5 223PE averages 40585 across all recorded tests, while the N150 averages 1025. The Core 5 223PE's nearest rivals include the Intel Core 7 253PE (0.1% ahead), Intel Xeon 6357P (0.1% behind), Intel Core Ultra X7 368H (0.2% behind), and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G (0.3% behind), all clustered within a narrow band. The N150's nearest rivals are the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T (0.1% ahead), Intel Core i3-4340 (0.1% behind), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (0.1% ahead), and Intel Core i7-5650U (0.2% behind), a set of processors from a much older or lower-performance generation.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Processor N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Q: How large is the multi-core performance difference?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core 5 223PE scores 26455 versus 2590.5 for the N150, a 921.2% difference. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the lead is 531% with scores of 2666 versus 422.5.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Both support DDR4 and DDR5, but the N150 adds LPDDR5 support. The Core 5 223PE uses a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the N150 uses a single-channel bus with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth. The Core 5 223PE also supports ECC memory; the N150 does not.

Q: What are the power consumption figures?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE has a TDP of 65 W. The Intel Processor N150 has a TDP of 6 W.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE boosts to 5.20 GHz. The Intel Processor N150 boosts to 3.60 GHz.

Q: How do their overall benchmark percentiles compare?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE ranks in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Processor N150 ranks in the 28th percentile.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 223PE | Intel Processor N150 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 4 |

| Threads | 16 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.90 GHz | 0.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 3.60 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 6 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 1264 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Twin Lake |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Intel Processor (Alder Lake-N) |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 38.4 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 9 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-11-19 |

| Launch MSRP | $232 | None recorded |

| Part Number | SA4QF | SRPNR |

The Verdict

The data directs users toward the Intel Core 5 223PE for any workload where processing throughput matters. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, 24 MB of L3 cache, dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and 5.20 GHz boost clock produce benchmark outcomes that the N150 cannot approach. The 87th percentile ranking versus the 28th percentile ranking summarizes the performance hierarchy accurately.

The Intel Processor N150 serves a distinct purpose based on its 6 W TDP and mobile BGA 1264 socket. Systems requiring minimal power draw, passive cooling, or a compact mobile platform would select the N150 despite its performance deficit. Its single-channel memory bus and 38.4 GB/s bandwidth align with a low-power design goal, and the lack of ECC support further positions it as an entry-level mobile processor.

The Core 5 223PE, with its 65 W TDP and desktop socket, requires a conventional power delivery and cooling solution. Its launch MSRP of $232 and Active production status indicate a mainstream desktop offering. The N150's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T and Intel Core i3-4340, belong to older generations, confirming its placement at the low end of current performance. The Core 5 223PE's nearest rivals, including the Intel Core 7 253PE and Intel Xeon 6357P, cluster within 0.3% of its average score, indicating it sits in a competitive mid-range desktop tier.

For users choosing between these two, the decision is not about benchmark parity but about platform and power requirements. The benchmark data shows no scenario where the N150 wins a performance test. The Core 5 223PE wins all four recorded head-to-head tests, with the smallest margin still exceeding double the N150's score. The N150 exists for efficiency and mobility, not for compute performance, and the recorded measurements confirm that division without exception.