Intel Core 5 223PE vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison

Intel Core 5 223PE vs Intel Processor 300

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 223PE and Intel Processor 300 occupy very different positions in the desktop CPU landscape. The Core 5 223PE is a high-core-count part with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Processor 300 is a modest 2-core, 4-thread entry point. The benchmark data in the database shows the Core 5 223PE holding an 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs, whereas the Processor 300 sits at the 50th percentile. This places the Core 5 223PE in the upper tier of desktop processors, while the Processor 300 lands squarely in the middle of the distribution.

The Core 5 223PE wins decisively in multi-threaded workloads. Its 8 physical cores and 16 threads allow it to process parallel tasks far more effectively than the Processor 300's 2 cores and 4 threads. The recorded Cinebench scores confirm this: the Core 5 223PE achieves 26,455 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, a figure that reflects strong scalability across its core count. The Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so direct numerical comparison is limited to the Core 5 223PE's absolute performance figures.

Single-thread performance tells a different story. The Processor 300 has a base clock of 3.90 GHz, which is higher than the Core 5 223PE's base clock of 2.90 GHz. The Core 5 223PE compensates with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, allowing it to reach higher peak frequencies when thermal headroom permits. The Processor 300 has no listed boost clock, meaning it operates at a fixed frequency. For lightly threaded applications that depend on sustained clock speed, the Processor 300's higher base clock may provide an advantage, though the Core 5 223PE's boost capability could close that gap when conditions allow.

The Core 5 223PE also wins on memory bandwidth. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Processor 300 lists no memory bandwidth figure. Both processors support ECC memory, but the Core 5 223PE includes ECC support while the Processor 300 does not. This makes the Core 5 223PE more suitable for error-sensitive workloads such as data processing or server-adjacent tasks.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The Core 5 223PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Processor 300 uses Raptor Lake-S. Both are manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node and built by Intel's own foundry. The Core 5 223PE belongs to the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation, while the Processor 300 belongs to the Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) generation.

Core configuration is the most significant architectural divergence. The Core 5 223PE packs 8 cores with 16 threads, while the Processor 300 has just 2 cores and 4 threads. Cache sizes reflect this difference. The Core 5 223PE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Processor 300 also has 80 KB of L1 cache per core but only 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 5 223PE's L3 cache is four times larger, which benefits workloads that repeatedly access the same data sets.

The die size differs as well. The Processor 300 has a recorded die size of 163 mm², while the Core 5 223PE has no die size listed in the database. Both processors use the same socket, Intel Socket 1700, and both support dual-channel memory with DDR4 and DDR5 modules. PCIe connectivity is identical: Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU.

Integrated graphics distinguish the two parts. The Core 5 223PE ships with UHD Graphics 730, while the Processor 300 includes UHD Graphics 710. This is a minor differentiation for desktop users who typically pair these processors with discrete graphics cards, but it does affect systems that rely on integrated output.

The Core 5 223PE has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Processor 300 has a lower TDP of 46 watts. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning they are not intended for manual overclocking. The production status for both is listed as Active, and both are currently available in the market.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Core 5 223PE and the Processor 300. The Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark scores at all, which limits comparative analysis to the Core 5 223PE's absolute results and its positioning against other processors in the database.

The Core 5 223PE's benchmark results show a processor that excels in both multi-core and single-core scenarios. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2,666 in multi-core and 376 in single-core. Cinebench R20 results show 11,111 multi-core and 1,568 single-core. The Cinebench R23 results are 26,455 multi-core and 3,734 single-core. These scores place the Core 5 223PE well above the average processor in the database.

PassMark results reinforce this picture. The Core 5 223PE scores 31,124 in the multithread test, 4,219 in the single-thread test, 99,819 in integer math, 76,468 in floating-point math, and 346,623 in data compression. It also achieves 18,448 in data encryption, 24,672 in extended instructions, 159 in prime number finding, 2,493 in physics, and 35,798 in random string sorting. Its average benchmark score is 40,585, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs.

Comparing the Core 5 223PE to its nearest rivals in the database provides context. The Intel Core 7 253PE has an average score of 40,557, which is 0.1% lower than the Core 5 223PE's average. The Intel Xeon 6357P scores 40,630, 0.1% higher. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 40,518, 0.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G scores 40,718, 0.3% higher. These deltas are small, indicating that the Core 5 223PE performs within a tight band of similarly positioned processors.

The Processor 300's lack of benchmark data means its performance cannot be quantified against the Core 5 223PE directly. Its 50th percentile ranking suggests it performs at the median of all CPUs in the database, but the absence of specific scores leaves a gap in the analysis.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear distinction between these two processors. The Intel Core 5 223PE is designed for users who need substantial multi-threaded performance. Its 8 cores, 16 threads, 24 MB of L3 cache, and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth make it a strong choice for workloads that scale across cores, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, compilation, and data processing. The recorded Cinebench and PassMark scores confirm its capability across these scenarios. Its 87th percentile ranking places it among the top processors in the database.

The Intel Processor 300 is a different proposition. With 2 cores, 4 threads, and 6 MB of L3 cache, it targets basic desktop tasks such as web browsing, office applications, and light media consumption. Its higher base clock of 3.90 GHz may provide responsive single-thread performance, but the lack of boost clock and benchmark scores leaves its exact capabilities unquantified in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking indicates it performs at the median level.

Users who run heavily threaded applications should select the Core 5 223PE. Users whose workloads are primarily single-threaded or who require only basic computing power may find the Processor 300 sufficient, though the Core 5 223PE's boost clock of 5.20 GHz could still outperform it in single-thread tasks when active. The Core 5 223PE also offers ECC memory support, which the Processor 300 lacks, making it the more reliable choice for data-sensitive workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What is the clock speed difference between the two processors?

A: The Core 5 223PE has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Processor 300 has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and no listed boost clock.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Core 5 223PE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Processor 300 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Core 5 223PE supports ECC memory, but the Processor 300 does not.

Q: What integrated graphics do the two processors include?

A: The Core 5 223PE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the Processor 300 includes UHD Graphics 710.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The Core 5 223PE has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Processor 300 has a TDP of 46 watts.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 223PE | Intel Processor 300 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 2 |

| Threads | 16 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.90 GHz | 3.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | None |

| TDP | 65 W | 46 W |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-S |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 10 nm |

| Die Size | None | 163 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | None |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Launch MSRP | $232 | $82 |