Intel Core 5 223PE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125HL Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core 5 223PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.9 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core Ultra 5 125HL

CORE STATE Meteor Lake-PS
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 18 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.2 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 18 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Meteor Lake
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,666
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
376
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
11,111
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,568
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
26,455
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
3,734
N/A
passmark_data_compression
346,623
N/A
passmark_data_encryption
18,448
N/A
passmark_extended_instructions
24,672
N/A
passmark_find_prime_numbers
159
N/A
passmark_floating_point_math
76,468
N/A
passmark_integer_math
99,819
N/A
passmark_multithread
31,124
N/A
passmark_physics
2,493
N/A
passmark_random_string_sorting
35,798
N/A
passmark_single_thread
4,219
N/A
passmark_singlethread
4,219
N/A

Analysis: Intel Core 5 223PE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125HL

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a complex comparison because the Intel Core 5 223PE has a full suite of recorded test scores, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 125HL currently has no entries in the database. This asymmetry means the analysis must rely on the Core 5 223PE's measured performance and its standing against the broader CPU population, then infer the Ultra 5's position from its architectural profile and percentile ranking.

The Core 5 223PE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26455 and a single-core score of 3734. In Cinebench R20, it reaches 11111 multi-core and 1568 single-core. The R15 results show 2666 multi-core and 376 single-core. These Cinebench figures place the processor in the 87th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 40585.

For the Core Ultra 5 125HL, the database records a 50th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 0, reflecting the absence of measured test data. The percentile gap of 37 points between the two processors suggests a substantial performance differential, though the lack of direct head-to-head scores requires careful interpretation.

The PassMark suite for the Core 5 223PE shows strengths in specific workloads. Integer math scores 99819, floating point math reaches 76468, and extended instructions hit 24672. Data compression records 346623, while data encryption scores 18448. Find prime numbers returns 159, random string sorting reaches 35798, physics scores 2493, and multi-thread performance is 31124. Single-thread performance registers 4219 on both single-thread tests recorded.

When examining the nearest rivals for the Core 5 223PE, the data shows tight clustering. The Intel Core 7 253PE averages 40557, a delta of 0.1 percent from the Core 5 223PE's 40585 average. The Intel Xeon 6357P scores 40630, sitting 0.1 percent higher. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H averages 40518, 0.2 percent lower, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G reaches 40718, 0.3 percent above. These margins indicate the Core 5 223PE competes in a very narrow performance band.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 223PE's recorded benchmarks establish clear strengths in multi-threaded and single-threaded compute tasks. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26455 positions it well above the 50th percentile baseline that the Core Ultra 5 125HL occupies. The PassMark multi-thread score of 31124 reinforces this multi-core capability, while the single-thread score of 4219 indicates strong per-core efficiency.

The Core Ultra 5 125HL presents a different value profile based on its specifications. With 14 cores and 18 threads compared to the Core 5 223PE's 8 cores and 16 threads, the Ultra 5 clearly targets workloads that scale with core count. However, without benchmark scores in the database, its actual performance advantage cannot be quantified. The architectural differences, including a 7 nm process node versus 10 nm, suggest the Ultra 5 may deliver better power efficiency per operation, but the data does not confirm this.

For use-case analysis, the Core 5 223PE demonstrates verified capability in content creation and scientific computing through its Cinebench and PassMark scores. The Core Ultra 5 125HL, with its integrated Arc Xe-LPG 112EU graphics, likely serves tasks requiring GPU acceleration, though no benchmark data confirms this. The Ultra 5's lower 45 W TDP compared to 65 W for the Core 5 223PE suggests deployment in power-constrained environments, but the performance trade-off remains unmeasured.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design generations. The Core 5 223PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename with a 10 nm process node, built by Intel. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Core Ultra 5 125HL uses the Meteor Lake-PS codename with a 7 nm process node, also built by Intel. Its cache configuration includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3.

The thread architecture differs significantly. The Core 5 223PE provides 8 cores and 16 threads, indicating full Hyper-Threading support across all cores. The Core Ultra 5 125HL provides 14 cores and 18 threads, which implies a hybrid configuration where some cores do not support simultaneous multi-threading. This core count disparity is the most visible architectural distinction.

Memory support also separates the two. The Core 5 223PE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core Ultra 5 125HL supports only DDR5, with the specification noting it depends on the motherboard. Both use dual-channel memory buses with identical 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth. ECC memory support exists on the Core 5 223PE but is absent on the Core Ultra 5 125HL.

PCIe connectivity shows a generational gap. The Core 5 223PE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Core Ultra 5 125HL provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes. The integrated graphics differ substantially: the Core 5 223PE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 5 125HL uses Arc Xe-LPG 112EU.

Specification Differences

The socket and platform requirements are distinct. The Core 5 223PE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 5 125HL uses Intel Socket 1851. This incompatibility means system upgrades require a new motherboard.

Clock speeds show a notable trade-off. The Core 5 223PE runs at a 2.90 GHz base clock with a 5.20 GHz boost clock. The Core Ultra 5 125HL runs at a 1.20 GHz base clock with a 4.50 GHz boost clock. The Core 5 223PE's higher clocks directly contribute to its measured single-thread performance, while the Ultra 5's lower base clock suggests a design prioritizing power efficiency over raw frequency.

Thermal design power differs by 20 W. The Core 5 223PE carries a 65 W TDP, while the Core Ultra 5 125HL is rated at 45 W. The production status for both is Active, and both have locked multipliers.

Release timing shows the Core 5 223PE launched later, with a release date in March 2026, while the Core Ultra 5 125HL arrived in April 2024. The launch MSRP for the Core 5 223PE is $232, and for the Core Ultra 5 125HL it is $325.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 125HL has 14 cores and 18 threads, while the Intel Core 5 223PE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How do their cache sizes compare?

A: The Core 5 223PE has 80 KB of L1 per core and 24 MB of shared L3, while the Core Ultra 5 125HL has 112 KB of L1 per core and 18 MB of shared L3. Both have 2 MB of L2 per core.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Core 5 223PE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Core Ultra 5 125HL supports DDR5 only, with the motherboard determining the specific configuration.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds?

A: The Core 5 223PE boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Core Ultra 5 125HL boosts to 4.50 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. ECC memory support is available on the Core 5 223PE but not on the Core Ultra 5 125HL.

Q: What sockets do these processors use?

A: The Core 5 223PE uses Intel Socket 1700, and the Core Ultra 5 125HL uses Intel Socket 1851.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking in the database?

A: The Core 5 223PE ranks in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the Core Ultra 5 125HL ranks in the 50th percentile.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 223PE
Ultra 5 125HL
Core Specs
Cores
8
14 +75.0%
Threads
16
18 +12.5%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.9
1.2 -58.6%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
4.5 -13.5%
Frequency (GHz)
2.9
1.2 -58.6%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
4.5 -13.5%
Multiplier
29
12 -58.6%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
112 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
24 MB (shared)
18 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
45 -30.8%
PL1
65 W
—
PL2
219 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
—
Meteor Lake
Codename
Bartlett Lake
Meteor Lake-PS
Generation
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Ultra 5 (Meteor Lake-PS)
Process Size
10 nm
7 nm
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
—
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel Socket 1851
Chipsets
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
—
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 8 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 10
E-Core Frequency
—
700 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
LP E-Cores
—
2
AI/NPU
NPU
—
Yes / 11 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 730
Arc Xe-LPG 112EU
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$232
$325
Part Number
SA4QF
SRN9D
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-LGA18V
Tj Max
100°C
105°C
View Core 5 223PE Details View Core Ultra 5 125HL Details