Intel Core 5 223PE vs Intel Core i9-14901TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a complete benchmark suite for the Intel Core 5 223PE, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE has no benchmark entries in the dataset. This makes a direct score-by-score comparison impossible. However, the Core 5 223PE's absolute scores and its percentile ranking allow for meaningful interpretation of its standing.

The Core 5 223PE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26455 and a single-core score of 3734. In Cinebench R20, it records 11111 multi-core and 1568 single-core. The R15 results show 2666 multi-core and 376 single-core. These scores place the chip at the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database, indicating it outperforms the large majority of recorded processors.

PassMark results for the Core 5 223PE further characterize its behavior. The multi-thread score is 31124, with a single-thread score of 4219. Integer math reaches 99819, floating point math hits 76468, and extended instructions score 24672. Data compression scores 346623, while data encryption scores 18448. Prime number finding records 159, physics scores 2493, and random string sorting scores 35798.

The nearest rival comparisons in the database show the Core 5 223PE sits in a tightly contested performance band. The Intel Core 7 253PE averages 40557, which is 0.1% below the Core 5 223PE's average benchmark score of 40585. The Intel Xeon 6357P averages 40630, 0.1% above. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H averages 40518, 0.2% below. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G averages 40718, 0.3% above. These delta values are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the Core 5 223PE is effectively tied with these four processors in aggregate performance.

For the Core i9-14901TE, the database lists no benchmark scores, no average score, and no nearest rivals. Its percentile rank is recorded at 50, the median position, but this appears to be a placeholder rather than a measured result. Without recorded measurements, no head-to-head wins can be assigned to either processor. The wins counter shows zero for both parts.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear but asymmetric conclusion. The Intel Core 5 223PE has a full set of measured scores, an average benchmark score of 40585, and an 87th percentile standing. Any builder evaluating that processor can rely on concrete figures showing strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance.

The Intel Core i9-14901TE has no recorded benchmark data in the database. Its average benchmark score is zero, and it has no nearest rivals. The 50th percentile listing is not supported by any underlying measurements. From the available data, no performance claims can be made for this processor.

For a builder choosing between these two, the Core 5 223PE is the only one with measured evidence. It delivers Cinebench R23 multi-core performance of 26455 and single-core of 3734, placing it in the top 13% of all recorded CPUs. The Core i9-14901TE cannot be assessed from the database, so any selection involving it would lack benchmark backing.

The Core 5 223PE also shows competitive positioning against its nearest rivals. Being within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G, the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H, the Intel Core 7 253PE, and the Intel Xeon 6357P means it belongs in the same performance class as those parts. Builders seeking a desktop processor with measured results should favor the Core 5 223PE.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-14901TE have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Core i9-14901TE, and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 223PE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core 5 223PE averages 40585. The Intel Core 7 253PE is 0.1% lower, the Intel Xeon 6357P is 0.1% higher, the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is 0.2% lower, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G is 0.3% higher.

Q: What is the Core 5 223PE's Cinebench R23 performance?

A: It scores 26455 in multi-core and 3734 in single-core.

Q: What is the Core 5 223PE's PassMark single-thread score?

A: The PassMark single-thread score is 4219, with a multi-thread score of 31124.

Q: Where does the Core 5 223PE rank among all CPUs in the database?

A: It sits at the 87th percentile of all recorded CPUs.

Q: Does the Core i9-14901TE have a recorded percentile ranking?

A: The database lists a 50th percentile, but with no benchmark scores or average score to support it, this figure carries no measured evidence.

Specification Differences

The two processors share several core specifications. Both have 8 cores and 16 threads, use the Intel Socket 1700, support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, feature Gen 5 PCIe with 16 CPU lanes, support ECC memory, and have locked multipliers.

Clock speeds differ. The Core 5 223PE has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Core i9-14901TE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Core i9-14901TE boosts 0.30 GHz higher but idles at a 0.60 GHz lower base frequency.

Thermal design power differs substantially. The Core 5 223PE is rated at 65 watts, while the Core i9-14901TE is rated at 45 watts. This makes the i9-14901TE the lower-power part on paper, though the Core 5 223PE may sustain higher all-core clocks under load given its higher TDP allowance.

Memory bandwidth is only listed for the Core 5 223PE at 89.6 GB/s. The Core i9-14901TE has no recorded memory bandwidth figure.

Integrated graphics differ. The Core 5 223PE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core i9-14901TE uses UHD Graphics 770.

Release dates differ. The Core i9-14901TE was released on 2024-06-30, while the Core 5 223PE was released on 2026-03-08.

The launch MSRP for the Core 5 223PE is $232. The Core i9-14901TE has no launch MSRP recorded.

Architecture Differences

The Core 5 223PE belongs to the Bartlett Lake codename and is part of the Core 5 generation. The Core i9-14901TE belongs to the Raptor Lake-R codename, uses the Raptor Lake architecture, and is part of the Core 14th Gen series, specifically the Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation.

Both processors are manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel. The Core i9-14901TE has a recorded die size of 257 mm², while the Core 5 223PE has no die size listed.

Cache configurations differ in L3 capacity. Both have 80 KB L1 per core and 2 MB L2 per core. The Core 5 223PE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core i9-14901TE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This gives the Core i9-14901TE 12 MB more L3, which can reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data.

The Core i9-14901TE has no recorded production status issue; both parts are listed as Active. The part numbers differ: the Core 5 223PE uses SA4QF, and the Core i9-14901TE uses Q49CSRNJJ.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 223PE wins in the database because it has measured results. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26455 and single-core score of 3734 provide concrete evidence of strong performance. Its PassMark scores reinforce this, particularly the integer math result of 99819 and floating point math result of 76468. Builders focused on rendering, content creation, or general productivity can point to these numbers as validation.

The Core 5 223PE also wins on clock speed consistency. Its base clock of 2.90 GHz is higher than the Core i9-14901TE's 2.30 GHz. For workloads that rely on sustained base frequency, such as long compile jobs or continuous encoding, the Core 5 223PE has an advantage on paper.

The Core 5 223PE wins on memory bandwidth specification, with a recorded 89.6 GB/s versus no figure for the Core i9-14901TE. This matters for memory-sensitive tasks.

The Core i9-14901TE wins on paper in boost clock, reaching 5.50 GHz versus 5.20 GHz for the Core 5 223PE. Single-threaded workloads that can hit peak boost may favor the i9-14901TE, though no measured scores confirm this.

The Core i9-14901TE wins on L3 cache capacity, with 36 MB versus 24 MB. Applications with large working sets that fit in cache, such as database queries or certain scientific workloads, could benefit from the larger shared cache.

The Core i9-14901TE wins on power efficiency on paper, with a 45 watt TDP versus 65 watts for the Core 5 223PE. Systems with tight thermal or power budgets would favor the lower TDP part, but again, no performance data backs this up.

The Core i9-14901TE wins on integrated graphics, using UHD Graphics 770 versus UHD Graphics 730. For systems without a discrete GPU, the i9-14901TE offers a more capable iGPU on paper.

The Core 5 223PE wins on release recency, being released in 2026 versus 2024 for the Core i9-14901TE. It also has a recorded launch MSRP of $232, while the i9-14901TE has none.

In aggregate, the Core 5 223PE is the only processor with benchmark evidence. The Core i9-14901TE's advantages are all specification-level and unverified by any recorded test. Builders who prioritize measured performance should select the Core 5 223PE. Builders who prioritize lower TDP, higher peak boost, larger L3 cache, or better integrated graphics on paper would look at the Core i9-14901TE, but they would be making that choice without any benchmark confirmation.