Intel Core 5 223PE vs Intel Core i9-13905H Comparison

The Intel Core 5 223PE and Intel Core i9-13905H are both 10 nm Intel parts, but they target entirely different platforms and workloads. The Core 5 223PE is a desktop processor on Socket 1700, while the Core i9-13905H is a mobile chip on BGA 1744. The benchmark data reveals a clear split: the desktop chip dominates in single-threaded and many multi-threaded tasks, while the mobile chip holds advantages in a few specific data-centric workloads.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking disparity appears in Cinebench R23 single-core, where the Core 5 223PE scores 3734 against the i9-13905H's 2020. That is an 84.9% lead, a massive gap that indicates a fundamental difference in sustained single-thread performance. The R15 single-core test tells a similar story, with the Core 5 223PE winning 376 to 246, a 52.8% advantage. These results are not marginal; they suggest the desktop part has a significant architectural or power-delivery advantage for lightly threaded work.

Multi-core performance is more nuanced. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core 5 223PE wins decisively with 26455 versus 20034, a 32.1% lead. This is surprising given that the i9-13905H has 14 cores and 20 threads versus the Core 5 223PE's 8 cores and 16 threads. The R20 multi-core test also favors the Core 5 223PE, but by a smaller margin: 11111 versus 10605, a 4.8% win. However, in the older Cinebench R15 multi-core test, the i9-13905H takes the win with 2857 against 2666, a 6.7% advantage. This reversal across Cinebench versions suggests that the newer R23 workload scales better with the Core 5 223PE's architecture, while the older R15 test favors the i9's higher core count.

PassMark results add another layer. The Core 5 223PE wins the PassMark multi-thread test with 31124 versus 29779, a 4.5% lead. Single-thread performance in PassMark also goes to the Core 5 223PE: 4219 versus 3703, a 13.9% margin. The extended instructions test shows a 15.8% win for the Core 5 223PE (24672 versus 21297), and the find prime numbers test shows a 30.3% win (159 versus 122). Floating-point math also edges in favor of the Core 5 223PE, with 76468 versus 73434, a 4.1% improvement. Physics simulation goes to the Core 5 223PE by a 21.4% margin (2493 versus 2054).

The i9-13905H fights back in data tasks. It wins data compression with 354330 versus 346623, a 2.2% edge. Data encryption is a clearer win for the mobile chip: 20464 versus 18448, a 9.9% advantage. Integer math goes to the i9-13905H with 101716 versus 99819, a 1.9% margin. Random string sorting also favors the i9-13905H, with 37460 versus 35798, a 4.4% win. These five wins for the i9-13905H are concentrated in memory-bandwidth-sensitive or integer-heavy operations, where its higher core count and different memory subsystem help.

Overall, the Core 5 223PE wins 12 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons, while the i9-13905H wins 5. The average benchmark scores are close—40585 for the Core 5 223PE and 40313 for the i9-13905H—but the distribution of wins shows the Core 5 223PE is the stronger general-purpose performer.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i9-13905H has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, compared to the Intel Core 5 223PE's 5.20 GHz. Despite the lower boost clock, the Core 5 223PE wins single-threaded benchmarks by a wide margin.

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The Intel Core i9-13905H has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 5 223PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The i9 has more physical cores, but the Core 5 223PE still wins multi-threaded tests in Cinebench R20 and R23.

Q: Are these CPUs unlocked for overclocking?

A: Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. Both the Intel Core 5 223PE and the Intel Core i9-13905H are locked parts.

Q: What is the difference in TDP?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel Core i9-13905H has a TDP of 45 watts. The desktop chip draws more power, which likely contributes to its higher sustained performance.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i9-13905H does not. This makes the Core 5 223PE a potential option for error-checking workloads.

Q: What are the integrated graphics solutions?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the Intel Core i9-13905H includes Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The i9's integrated graphics is a higher-tier solution for mobile use.

The Verdict

The data points to the Intel Core 5 223PE as the stronger processor for most tasks. It wins the majority of benchmarks, including all single-threaded tests and the most demanding multi-threaded render workloads. The 84.9% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core and the 32.1% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core are decisive. The i9-13905H is only competitive in specific data tasks like encryption and compression, where it ekes out wins by up to 9.9%. For a desktop builder looking at raw performance, the Core 5 223PE is the clear choice. For a mobile user who needs the i9's specific data-handling strengths, the i9-13905H has a niche, but it is not the general-purpose winner.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ in several fundamental specifications. The Intel Core 5 223PE uses the Intel Socket 1700, while the Intel Core i9-13905H uses the Intel BGA 1744. The Core 5 223PE has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost of 5.20 GHz, whereas the i9-13905H has a base of 2.60 GHz and a boost of 5.40 GHz. TDP differs significantly: 65 watts for the Core 5 223PE versus 45 watts for the i9-13905H. The Core 5 223PE supports ECC memory; the i9-13905H does not. PCIe lane counts also differ: the Core 5 223PE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the i9-13905H offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes. The Core 5 223PE has a listed memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the i9-13905H has no listed memory bandwidth. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 223PE and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on the i9-13905H. The i9-13905H has a die size of 257 mm², while the Core 5 223PE has no listed die size.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 5 223PE is based on the Bartlett Lake architecture and is part of the Core 5 generation. The Intel Core i9-13905H is based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H codename, and belongs to the Core 13th Gen series. Both are built on a 10 nm process at Intel, but the underlying designs differ. The Core 5 223PE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the i9-13905H has 14 cores and 20 threads. Both share the same L1 cache of 80 KB per core and L2 cache of 2 MB per core, and both have 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The i9-13905H has a die size of 257 mm², while the Core 5 223PE does not list one. The i9-13905H is a mobile part, while the Core 5 223PE is a desktop part. The Core 5 223PE supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the i9-13905H. The PCIe implementation also differs, with the Core 5 223PE offering 16 lanes and the i9-13905H offering 8 lanes, both Gen 5.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 223PE is the winner for single-threaded workloads. Its 84.9% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core and 52.8% lead in R15 single-core make it the obvious pick for applications that rely on high per-core performance, such as older games or lightly threaded productivity apps. It also wins in multi-threaded rendering tasks, as shown by its 32.1% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 4.8% lead in R20 multi-core. The PassMark multi-thread score of 31124 versus 29779 confirms this. For physics simulation, the Core 5 223PE's 21.4% win (2493 versus 2054) makes it a better choice for physics-based workloads in engineering or scientific contexts. Extended instruction workloads also favor the Core 5 223PE by 15.8%, and prime number finding by 30.3%.

The Intel Core i9-13905H wins in specific data manipulation tasks. Its 9.9% win in data encryption (20464 versus 18448) makes it the better option for encryption-heavy operations. Data compression goes to the i9-13905H by a 2.2% margin, and random string sorting by 4.4%. Integer math also slightly favors the i9-13905H, with a 1.9% win. The i9-13905H also wins the older Cinebench R15 multi-core test by 6.7%, suggesting it performs well in legacy multi-threaded benchmarks. For users whose workloads are dominated by these data-intensive or integer-heavy tasks, the i9-13905H offers a meaningful advantage, despite losing the overall performance battle.