Intel Core 5 223PE vs Intel Core i7-14650HX Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core 5 223PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.9 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-14650HX

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-HX
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.2 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 30 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 55W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,666
3,470.5
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
376
285.5
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
11,111
11,946
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,568
1,686
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
26,455
20,454
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
3,734
1,969
passmark_data_compression
346,623
398,418
passmark_data_encryption
18,448
22,917
passmark_extended_instructions
24,672
24,150
passmark_find_prime_numbers
159
152
passmark_floating_point_math
76,468
84,999
passmark_integer_math
99,819
116,661
passmark_multithread
31,124
33,495
passmark_physics
2,493
2,202
passmark_random_string_sorting
35,798
43,035
passmark_single_thread
4,219
3,841
passmark_singlethread
4,219
3,841
geekbench_multicore
N/A
14,249
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
2,173

Analysis: Intel Core 5 223PE vs Intel Core i7-14650HX

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data splits this comparison into two distinct profiles. The Intel Core i7-14650HX takes 9 of the 17 recorded tests, while the Intel Core 5 223PE wins 8. That near-even split hides the scale of the victories on each side.

The biggest single gap belongs to the Core 5 223PE in Cinebench R23 single-core. It scores 3734 against the i7-14650HX's 1969, a 47.3% advantage. That is not a marginal lead; it is a generational single-thread dominance. The same pattern appears in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the Core 5 wins 376 to 285.5, a 24.1% margin. In PassMark single-thread, the Core 5 leads 4219 to 3841, a 9% edge.

Multi-core results tell the opposite story, but with a twist. The i7-14650HX wins Cinebench R15 multi-core by a commanding 30.2% (3470.5 vs 2666). It also takes Cinebench R20 multi-core by 7.5% (11946 vs 11111). Yet in Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core 5 223PE flips the result entirely, scoring 26455 against 20454, a 22.7% win. That inconsistency between R15, R20 and R23 suggests the two processors scale differently under prolonged all-core loads.

The PassMark suite shows the i7-14650HX as the stronger all-round compute engine. It leads in data compression by 14.9% (398418 vs 346623), data encryption by 24.2% (22917 vs 18448), floating point math by 11.2% (84999 vs 76468), integer math by 16.9% (116661 vs 99819), multithread by 7.6% (33495 vs 31124) and random string sorting by 20.2% (43035 vs 35798). The Core 5 only manages narrow wins in extended instructions (24672 vs 24150, a 2.1% edge), prime number finding (159 vs 152, a 4.4% edge) and physics (2493 vs 2202, an 11.7% edge).

Notably, the i7-14650HX wins Cinebench R20 single-core by 7.5% (1686 vs 1568), which contradicts its heavy losses in the other single-core tests. That outlier suggests the R20 single-core workload favors the i7's architecture in a way that R15 and R23 do not.

The Verdict

The data points to two different buyers. The Intel Core i7-14650HX is the choice for throughput-heavy workloads that use many cores: data compression, encryption, integer and floating point math all favor it by double-digit margins. It also holds a 30.2% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core, a benchmark sensitive to raw core count and memory bandwidth. Its 16 cores and 24 threads give it a structural advantage in parallel tasks.

The Intel Core 5 223PE is the choice for single-thread-bound software. Its 47.3% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core is the largest recorded margin in this entire comparison. It also wins PassMark single-thread by 9% and Cinebench R15 single-core by 24.1%. Applications that rely on one or two fast cores, such as older games or lightly threaded productivity tools, will feel this difference immediately.

The overall averages are close: the i7-14650HX records an average benchmark score of 41576 against the Core 5's 40585, a gap of about 2.4%. The i7 also sits at the 88th percentile of all CPUs, one point above the Core 5's 87th. So on average the i7 is slightly ahead, but the Core 5's single-core peaks make it the better pick for workloads that cannot spread across many threads.

Users who run heavily parallel, sustained workloads should pick the i7-14650HX. Users who prioritize snappy single-thread response and do not need 16 cores should pick the Core 5 223PE.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel families. The i7-14650HX uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-HX codename, part of the Core 14th Gen series. The Core 5 223PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and sits in the Core 5 generation line.

Both are built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The i7-14650HX has a die size of 257 mm²; the database records no die size for the Core 5 223PE.

Core counts differ sharply. The i7-14650HX packs 16 cores and 24 threads. The Core 5 223PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. That is exactly half the physical cores but two-thirds of the threads, indicating a different core topology.

Cache layouts are similar in per-core terms but differ in total. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core. The i7-14650HX shares 30 MB of L3, while the Core 5 223PE shares 24 MB. With twice the cores, the i7's larger L3 makes sense for feeding more execution units.

Base clocks favor the Core 5: it runs at 2.90 GHz against the i7's 2.20 GHz. Boost clocks are identical at 5.20 GHz. The power envelopes flip the expectation: the i7-14650HX has a 55 W TDP, while the Core 5 draws 65 W despite having fewer cores.

The i7-14650HX is unlocked for overclocking, while the Core 5 223PE is locked. The i7 uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, the Core 5 uses Intel Socket 1700. The integrated graphics differ: the i7 carries UHD Graphics 710, the Core 5 carries UHD Graphics 730.

Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and both support ECC memory. The Core 5 lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; the database has no bandwidth figure for the i7. Both use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

The release dates are far apart. The i7-14650HX launched on January 7, 2024. The Core 5 223PE launched on March 8, 2026. Both remain in active production.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX has 16 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core 5 223PE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor wins in single-core performance?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE wins the majority of single-core tests. It leads by 47.3% in Cinebench R23 single-core, 24.1% in Cinebench R15 single-core and 9% in PassMark single-thread. The i7-14650HX wins Cinebench R20 single-core by 7.5%.

Q: Which processor wins in multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX wins Cinebench R15 multi-core by 30.2% and Cinebench R20 multi-core by 7.5%. The Intel Core 5 223PE wins Cinebench R23 multi-core by 22.7%. In PassMark multithread, the i7 leads by 7.6%.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX has an average benchmark score of 41576, placing it at the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 223PE has an average score of 40585, at the 87th percentile.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i7-14650HX and the Intel Core 5 223PE support ECC memory. Both also support DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: Both processors boost to 5.20 GHz. Their base clocks differ, with the Core 5 223PE at 2.90 GHz and the i7-14650HX at 2.20 GHz.

Where Each One Wins

The i7-14650HX dominates in compression and encryption workloads. Its 14.9% lead in data compression and 24.2% lead in data encryption make it the clear pick for archiving, backup tools and encrypted storage workflows. The 16.9% edge in integer math and 11.2% edge in floating point math extend that advantage to scientific computing, financial modeling and any numeric-heavy simulation.

The i7 also wins the Cinebench R15 multi-core test by 30.2%, a benchmark that stresses memory subsystem throughput alongside core count. Its 20.2% lead in random string sorting points to strength in database-like operations and text processing pipelines. The 7.6% multithread win in PassMark confirms the general all-core advantage.

The Core 5 223PE wins in single-thread response. The 47.3% Cinebench R23 single-core margin is the standout number in the entire dataset, and the 24.1% R15 single-core win corroborates it. For interactive applications, spreadsheet recalculation or older codebases with poor threading, the Core 5 will feel markedly faster.

The Core 5 also wins the physics test by 11.7% and the prime number test by 4.4%, suggesting strength in specific algorithmic workloads that do not scale linearly with core count. Its extended instructions win of 2.1% is narrow but consistent with a newer instruction pipeline.

The i7-14650HX is the workstation-class part for parallel throughput. The Core 5 223PE is the responsive part for single-thread latency. The 9 wins for the i7 versus 8 for the Core 5 reflect a real split, not a statistical tie.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in core count: 16 cores and 24 threads for the i7-14650HX, versus 8 cores and 16 threads for the Core 5 223PE. Base clocks differ at 2.20 GHz for the i7 and 2.90 GHz for the Core 5. Boost clocks match at 5.20 GHz. TDP differs: 55 W for the i7, 65 W for the Core 5.

The i7-14650HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket; the Core 5 223PE uses Intel Socket 1700. The i7 runs the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-HX codename; the Core 5 runs the Bartlett Lake codename. The i7 belongs to the Core 14th Gen series; the Core 5 belongs to the Core 5 generation.

L3 cache differs: 30 MB shared on the i7, 24 MB shared on the Core 5. L1 and L2 are identical per core at 80 KB and 2 MB respectively. The die size is 257 mm² for the i7; no die size is recorded for the Core 5. The Core 5 lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; no bandwidth figure is recorded for the i7.

Integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics 710 on the i7, UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5. The i7 has an unlocked multiplier; the Core 5 is locked. Release dates differ: January 7, 2024 for the i7, March 8, 2026 for the Core 5. The Core 5 has a launch MSRP of $232. Both use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, support DDR4 and DDR5, and support ECC memory.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 223PE
i7-14650HX
Core Specs
Cores
8
16 +100.0%
Threads
16
24 +50.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.9
2.2 -24.1%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
5.2 0.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2.9
2.2 -24.1%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
5.2 0.0%
Multiplier
29
22 -24.1%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
24 MB (shared)
30 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
55 -15.4%
PL1
65 W
55 W
PL2
219 W
157 W
Architecture
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Codename
Bartlett Lake
Raptor Lake-HX
Generation
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Core i7 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh)
Process Size
10 nm
10 nm
Die Size
257 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel BGA 1964
Chipsets
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
WM790, HM770
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
1600 MHz up to 3.7 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 710
Other
Market
Desktop
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$232
Part Number
SA4QF
SRMXH
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-BGA16F
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Core 5 223PE Details View Core i7-14650HX Details