Intel Core 5 223PE vs Intel Core 5 315 Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core 5 223PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.9 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 315

CORE STATE Wildcat Lake
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 6 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.5 Base / 4.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 6 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 15W
ARCHITECTURE Wildcat Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,666
1,308
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
376
184
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
11,111
5,452
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,568
769
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
26,455
12,981
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
3,734
1,832
passmark_data_compression
346,623
146,143
passmark_data_encryption
18,448
11,119
passmark_extended_instructions
24,672
13,143
passmark_find_prime_numbers
159
112
passmark_floating_point_math
76,468
42,441
passmark_integer_math
99,819
31,690
passmark_multithread
31,124
15,272
passmark_physics
2,493
1,163
passmark_random_string_sorting
35,798
17,551
passmark_single_thread
4,219
4,021
passmark_singlethread
4,219
4,021

Analysis: Intel Core 5 223PE vs Intel Core 5 315

The Intel Core 5 223PE and Intel Core 5 315 are two very different processors that share a name but target opposite ends of the computing spectrum. The 223PE is a desktop part built for sustained throughput, while the 315 is a low-power mobile chip designed for efficiency. The benchmark data confirms a complete sweep: the 223PE wins all 17 recorded head-to-head tests. However, the margin of victory varies wildly depending on the workload, revealing that these chips are not just different in speed, but fundamentally different in design philosophy. The 223PE achieves a 104% lead in Cinebench multi-core tests, yet only a 4.9% lead in PassMark single-thread performance, indicating that the 315 is far more competitive in lightly-threaded tasks than its overall score suggests.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 223PE wins every single benchmark in the database. There is no test where the Core 5 315 manages to take the lead. The most decisive victory for the 223PE comes in PassMark integer math, where it scores 99,819 against 31,690, a 215% advantage. This extreme gap suggests that the 223PE’s 8 cores and 16 threads are heavily favored by integer-heavy workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core test shows a similar story, with the 223PE scoring 26,455 versus 12,981, a 103.8% improvement. The 223PE also excels in data compression, scoring 346,623 against 146,143, a 137.2% lead, which makes it the clear choice for archiving and file management tasks.

The Core 5 315 does not win any benchmarks, but its closest performance comes in the PassMark single-thread tests. The 315 scores 4,021 against the 223PE’s 4,219, a deficit of only 4.9%. This narrow gap shows that for basic single-threaded interactions, such as opening applications or navigating a browser, the 315 is nearly as responsive as its much larger desktop sibling. The 315 also performs relatively well in extended instructions, scoring 13,143 against 24,672, a 87.7% gap, which is smaller than the gaps seen in integer math or compression. The 315’s performance profile suggests it is best suited for mobile workflows that require short bursts of speed with minimal power draw, while the 223PE is built for long-duration, multi-threaded workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from entirely different manufacturing processes and design families. The Core 5 223PE is based on the Bartlett Lake architecture and is built on a 10 nm process node. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is a standard desktop interface. The Core 5 315, in contrast, uses the Wildcat Lake architecture and is manufactured on a 3 nm process node. This node advantage allows the 315 to achieve its low 15 W TDP, compared to the 223PE’s 65 W TDP. The 315 is also a mobile part, using the Intel BGA 1516 socket, which means it is soldered directly to the motherboard rather than being user-upgradeable.

The core configurations differ dramatically. The 223PE has 8 cores and 16 threads, meaning it supports simultaneous multithreading, while the 315 has 6 cores and 6 threads, with no hyper-threading support. The 223PE’s base clock is 2.90 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, whereas the 315 runs at a much lower 1.50 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost. The cache hierarchy also reflects their different roles. The 223PE uses an 80 KB per core L1 cache, a 2 MB per core L2 cache, and a 24 MB shared L3 cache. The 315 uses a single 192 KB L1, a 2.5 MB L2, and a much smaller 6 MB shared L3 cache. The 223PE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the 315 only supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. The 223PE also supports ECC memory, which the 315 does not.

The PCIe capabilities are also split by platform. The 223PE provides Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes, while the 315 is limited to Gen 4 with just 6 lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well: the 223PE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the 315 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The 315’s graphics are part of its mobile design, where it can handle modern display output with lower power consumption. Both processors have locked multipliers, so neither supports overclocking. The 223PE was released on 2026-03-08, while the 315 followed on 2026-04-15. The 223PE carries a launch MSRP of $232, while the 315 has a launch MSRP of $340.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE is significantly faster. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 26,455 against the Core 5 315’s 12,981, a 103.8% advantage. PassMark multithread confirms this, with the 223PE scoring 31,124 against 15,272.

Q: Is the Core 5 315 competitive in single-threaded tasks?

A: It is much closer. The 315 scores 4,021 in PassMark single-thread, only 4.9% behind the 223PE’s 4,219. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the gap widens to 103.8%, with the 223PE scoring 3,734 against 1,832.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Core 5 223PE supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus. The Core 5 315 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a single-channel bus. The 223PE has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the 315 has 59.7 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Core 5 223PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Core 5 315 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The 223PE also has a larger 24 MB shared L3 cache compared to the 315’s 6 MB.

Q: Do these processors support ECC memory?

A: Only the Core 5 223PE supports ECC memory. The Core 5 315 does not have ECC support.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Core 5 223PE has a 65 W TDP, while the Core 5 315 has a 15 W TDP. This makes the 315 more suitable for fanless or ultra-portable designs.

Specification Differences

The Core 5 223PE uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 5 315 uses 6 cores and 6 threads. Base clocks are 2.90 GHz for the 223PE and 1.50 GHz for the 315. Boost clocks are 5.20 GHz and 4.40 GHz, respectively. TDP is 65 W for the desktop part and 15 W for the mobile part. The 223PE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the 315 uses Intel BGA 1516. The codenames differ: Bartlett Lake versus Wildcat Lake. The process nodes are 10 nm for the 223PE and 3 nm for the 315. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core for the 223PE, while the 315 has a total of 192 KB. L2 cache is 2 MB per core versus 2.5 MB total. L3 cache is 24 MB shared versus 6 MB shared. Memory support is DDR4 and DDR5 for the 223PE, while the 315 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Memory bus is dual-channel versus single-channel. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s versus 59.7 GB/s. ECC support is present only on the 223PE. PCIe is Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the 223PE, while the 315 uses Gen 4 with 6 lanes. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730 versus Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. Market segment is Desktop for the 223PE and Mobile for the 315.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest margin in the entire dataset is in PassMark integer math, where the 223PE scores 99,819 against the 315’s 31,690, a 215% difference. This nearly threefold gap shows how heavily the 223PE’s extra cores and threads impact arithmetic-heavy workloads. Data compression also favors the desktop chip heavily, with the 223PE scoring 346,623 versus 146,143, a 137.2% lead. The 223PE wins PassMark physics by 114.4%, scoring 2,493 against 1,163. The Cinebench suite shows consistent 103.8% to 104.3% leads across both R15, R20, and R23 iterations, with the single-core R15 test showing the largest relative gap at 104.3%. The 223PE’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11,111 more than doubles the 315’s 5,452.

The PassMark multithread test shows a 103.8% lead, with the 223PE scoring 31,124 against 15,272. Random string sorting shows a 104% lead, with scores of 35,798 and 17,551. Floating-point math shows an 80.2% lead, with the 223PE scoring 76,468 against 42,441. Extended instructions show an 87.7% lead, with scores of 24,672 and 13,143. Data encryption shows a 65.9% lead, with the 223PE scoring 18,448 against 11,119. Find prime numbers shows a 42% lead, with scores of 159 and 112. The smallest gap in the entire dataset is in PassMark single-thread, where the 223PE scores 4,219 and the 315 scores 4,021, a 4.9% difference. This result indicates that the 315’s 3 nm process and high boost clock allow it to nearly match the 223PE when only one thread is active. The 223PE reaches the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the 315 sits at the 72nd percentile. The average benchmark score for the 223PE is 40,585, while the 315 averages 18,188. The 223PE’s nearest rival is the Intel Core 7 253PE, which is 0.1% ahead, while the 315’s nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 9274F, which is exactly 0% apart in average score.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 223PE
5 315
Core Specs
Cores
8
6 -25.0%
Threads
16
6 -62.5%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.9
1.5 -48.3%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
4.4 -15.4%
Frequency (GHz)
2.9
1.5 -48.3%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
4.4 -15.4%
Multiplier
29
15 -48.3%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
2.5 MB
L3 Cache
24 MB (shared)
6 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
15 -76.9%
PL1
65 W
PL2
219 W
Architecture
Codename
Bartlett Lake
Wildcat Lake
Generation
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Core 5 (Wildcat Lake)
Process Size
10 nm
3 nm
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR5, LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Single-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
59.7 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
6400 MT/s
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel BGA 1516
Chipsets
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 6 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 2 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1400 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 15 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 730
Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe)
Other
Market
Desktop
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$232
$340
Part Number
SA4QF
SAEFC
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-BGA
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Core 5 223PE Details View Core 5 315 Details