Intel Core 5 221TE vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

Intel Core 5 221TE and Intel Processor 300T are two desktop processors sharing the same Intel Socket 1700 platform, but they occupy very different positions in the product stack. The Core 5 221TE is a 10-core, 16-thread part based on Bartlett Lake, while the Processor 300T is a dual-core, four-thread chip built on Raptor Lake. The database contains extensive benchmark results for the Core 5 221TE, while the Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, making direct numerical comparison impossible. The analysis below relies on the architectural data and the Core 5 221TE's performance against its nearest rivals to establish its standing.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No direct head-to-head benchmark results exist in the database for these two processors. The Core 5 221TE has a full set of recorded scores across Cinebench and PassMark tests, while the Processor 300T has zero benchmark entries. This absence of data means the comparison must be drawn from the Core 5 221TE's absolute scores and its percentile position, alongside the architectural differences that explain the performance gap.

The Core 5 221TE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11305 and a single-core score of 1596. Its Cinebench R20 scores are 4748 multi-core and 670 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 1139 multi-core and 160 single-core. PassMark results for the Core 5 221TE include a multi-thread score of 13301, a single-thread score of 1734, integer math at 42303, floating point math at 31661, and data compression at 156682. It also records 8963 in data encryption, 9655 in extended instructions, 59 in find prime numbers, 977 in physics, and 16929 in random string sorting.

The Core 5 221TE achieves an average benchmark score of 17860, placing it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT with an average score of 17891, a delta of -0.2 percent relative to the Core 5 221TE, and the Intel Core 5 120U at 17898, also -0.2 percent. The Intel Core 7 350 scores 17779, which is 0.5 percent behind, and the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 scores 17994, putting it 0.7 percent behind the Core 5 221TE. These narrow deltas, all within one percent, show the Core 5 221TE sits in a tightly contested performance band despite its core advantage.

The Processor 300T, with only 2 cores and 4 threads, cannot match the parallel throughput of the 10-core, 16-thread Core 5 221TE. The Core 5 221TE's 24 MB of shared L3 cache dwarfs the Processor 300T's 6 MB shared L3. Its 1.80 GHz base clock and 5.00 GHz boost clock provide a wide frequency range, while the Processor 300T's 3.40 GHz base clock has no recorded boost clock. The Core 5 221TE's 45 TDP versus the Processor 300T's 35 TDP indicates a higher power envelope for the larger part.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 221TE wins decisively in multi-threaded workloads based on its core and thread count. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11305 reflects substantial parallel capability that a dual-core processor cannot approach. PassMark multi-thread at 13301, integer math at 42303, and floating point math at 31661 all demonstrate strength in compute-heavy tasks. Data compression at 156682 and random string sorting at 16929 show the Core 5 221TE handles data manipulation tasks with high throughput. The 71st percentile ranking confirms its position above the majority of CPUs in the database.

The Processor 300T wins in power efficiency. Its 35 TDP is lower than the Core 5 221TE's 45 TDP, making it a more modest power consumer. The 3.40 GHz base clock on the Processor 300T is higher than the Core 5 221TE's 1.80 GHz base clock, which could give the dual-core part an advantage in lightly threaded tasks that rely on base frequency rather than boost behavior. However, the Processor 300T's lack of recorded boost clock and benchmark scores leaves its actual performance unquantified in the database.

For single-thread performance, the Core 5 221TE records a PassMark single-thread score of 1734 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1596. These are solid numbers for a modern processor, and the 5.00 GHz boost clock provides headroom for high-frequency operation. The Processor 300T has no boost clock listed, so its single-thread ceiling is unknown. The Core 5 221TE's 10 cores also ensure that background tasks do not starve foreground applications of processing resources.

Architecture Differences

The Core 5 221TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is listed under the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation, while the Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-S codename and the Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) generation. Both processors are built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry, but the die sizes differ. The Core 5 221TE has a die size of 215 mm², while the Processor 300T measures 163 mm². The smaller die on the Processor 300T aligns with its reduced core count.

The Core 5 221TE features 10 cores and 16 threads, indicating a hybrid layout that includes performance and efficiency cores. The Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads, which suggests a simpler design with only performance cores or a limited efficiency core complement. Both processors use 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, but the L3 cache differs substantially. The Core 5 221TE has 24 MB of shared L3, while the Processor 300T has 6 MB of shared L3. This cache difference directly impacts the amount of data the processor can hold for rapid access during workloads.

Memory support is similar, with both supporting DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. The Core 5 221TE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Processor 300T has no memory bandwidth figure in the database. Both processors support PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics differ, with the Core 5 221TE using UHD Graphics 730 and the Processor 300T using UHD Graphics 710. The Core 5 221TE supports ECC memory, a feature the Processor 300T does not offer.

The Core 5 221TE was released on 2025-01-12 with a launch MSRP of $232, while the Processor 300T released on 2024-01-07 with a launch MSRP of $82. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning they do not support overclocking. The Core 5 221TE has a part number of SRVQS, and the Processor 300T has a part number of SRN3K. Both are currently Active in production and target the Desktop market segment.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count difference between the Intel Core 5 221TE and Intel Processor 300T?

A: The Intel Core 5 221TE has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: How does the L3 cache compare between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core 5 221TE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Processor 300T has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. The Intel Core 5 221TE also supports ECC memory, which the Intel Processor 300T does not.

Q: What are the integrated graphics models on each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 221TE uses UHD Graphics 730, and the Intel Processor 300T uses UHD Graphics 710.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock speed?

A: The Intel Processor 300T has a base clock of 3.40 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core 5 221TE's base clock of 1.80 GHz. The Core 5 221TE has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Processor 300T has no recorded boost clock.

Q: How do the TDP values differ?

A: The Intel Core 5 221TE has a TDP of 45, and the Intel Processor 300T has a TDP of 35.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 221TE | Intel Processor 300T |

|----------------|--------------------|------------------------|

| Cores | 10 | 2 |

| Threads | 16 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 1.80 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | Not recorded |

| TDP | 45 | 35 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-S |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Supported | Not supported |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $232 | $82 |

| Part Number | SRVQS | SRN3K |

Both processors share the same socket, process node, foundry, L1 and L2 cache configuration, memory support type, memory bus, PCIe generation and lane count, market segment, production status, and multiplier lock state.

The Verdict

The data indicates the Intel Core 5 221TE is the superior performer for multi-threaded and compute-intensive workloads. Its 10 cores, 16 threads, and 24 MB L3 cache provide the resources needed for parallel processing, and its recorded benchmark scores confirm this capability. The average benchmark score of 17860 and 71st percentile ranking place it above the majority of CPUs in the database, with nearest rivals within one percent of its score, showing it competes directly with established mid-range parts.

The Intel Processor 300T, with 2 cores and 4 threads, 6 MB L3 cache, and no benchmark scores in the database, cannot match the Core 5 221TE in raw performance. Its advantages are lower TDP and higher base clock, which may suit basic tasks and power-conscious systems. The lack of ECC support and lower integrated graphics tier further differentiate it as a more entry-level offering.

Users requiring parallel throughput, large cache capacity, and ECC memory should select the Intel Core 5 221TE. Users prioritizing lower power consumption and a higher base frequency for simple workloads may find the Intel Processor 300T preferable, though its performance remains unquantified in the database. The Core 5 221TE's launch MSRP of $232 and the Processor 300T's launch MSRP of $82 reflect their different positions, but the performance data clearly favors the Core 5 221TE for demanding applications.