Intel Core 5 221TE vs Intel Core i7-14701E Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 5 221TE has 10 cores, while the Intel Core i7-14701E has 8 cores. Both processors support 16 threads.

Q: What is the performance gap in the average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E records an average benchmark score of 33206, while the Intel Core 5 221TE scores 17860. The i7-14701E sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, compared to the 71st percentile for the Core 5 221TE.

Q: Which CPU has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 221TE reaches 5.00 GHz. The i7-14701E also has a higher base clock at 2.60 GHz versus 1.80 GHz.

Q: How do the cache sizes differ between these two processors?

A: The Intel Core 5 221TE has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i7-14701E has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. Both share the same 80 KB L1 cache per core.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 5 221TE and the Intel Core i7-14701E support ECC memory. Both also support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What integrated graphics do these CPUs include?

A: The Intel Core 5 221TE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the Intel Core i7-14701E includes UHD Graphics 770.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 5 221TE belongs to the Bartlett Lake generation and uses the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Intel Core i7-14701E is part of the Core 14th Gen series with the Raptor Lake architecture and Raptor Lake-R codename. Both processors are built on the same 10 nm process node by Intel and share the same Intel Socket 1700.

The Core 5 221TE packs 10 cores and 16 threads, whereas the i7-14701E uses 8 cores and 16 threads. This means the Bartlett Lake part relies on more physical cores to reach its thread count, while the Raptor Lake part achieves the same thread count with fewer cores. The die size differs substantially: the Core 5 221TE measures 215 mm², while the i7-14701E is larger at 257 mm².

Cache hierarchies diverge in the L2 and L3 levels. The Core 5 221TE provides 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 24 MB of shared L3, while the i7-14701E offers 2 MB of L2 per core and 33 MB of shared L3. The larger L3 cache on the i7-14701E likely contributes to its superior performance in cache-sensitive workloads.

Both CPUs support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and both support ECC memory. The Core 5 221TE lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the i7-14701E does not have a recorded memory bandwidth figure in the database. Both use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 221TE versus UHD Graphics 770 on the i7-14701E. The i7-14701E also carries a higher TDP of 65 watts compared to 45 watts for the Core 5 221TE. Both processors are locked, with no unlocked multiplier. The Core 5 221TE was released on 2025-01-12 with a launch MSRP of $232, while the i7-14701E launched on 2024-06-30 with no recorded launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data shows a decisive sweep: the Intel Core i7-14701E wins all 17 recorded benchmark comparisons. The Intel Core 5 221TE does not register a single win in any test.

In Cinebench tests, the i7-14701E leads by roughly half in every case. The multicore results show a 49.1% advantage for the i7-14701E in Cinebench R15 (2237 versus 1139), R20 (9321 versus 4748), and R23 (22195 versus 11305). Single-core Cinebench tests follow the same pattern: the i7-14701E leads by 49.2% in R15 (315 versus 160), 49% in R20 (1315 versus 670), and 49.1% in R23 (3133 versus 1596).

PassMark tests show similar margins across different workload types. Integer math favors the i7-14701E by 48% (81325 versus 42303), and floating point math shows a 48.8% lead (61873 versus 31661). The largest gap appears in single-thread performance, where the i7-14701E leads by 59.7% (4305 versus 1734 in both PassMark single-thread tests).

The smallest margin in the entire set is in data encryption, where the i7-14701E still leads by 39.7% (14862 versus 8963). Data compression shows a 44.6% lead (282939 versus 156682), random string sorting shows a 41.9% lead (29158 versus 16929), and extended instructions show a 47.9% lead (18528 versus 9655).

Prime number finding shows the widest delta among the PassMark tests: the i7-14701E scores 176 versus 59 for the Core 5 221TE, a 66.5% advantage. Physics tests also show a large gap at 59.3% (2399 versus 977). Multithread performance mirrors the Cinebench multicore results, with the i7-14701E ahead by 49.1% (26112 versus 13301).

The average benchmark score difference reinforces these individual results. The i7-14701E records 33206, nearly double the 17860 of the Core 5 221TE. In the context of nearest rivals, the Core 5 221TE sits within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (17994) and within 0.5% of the Intel Core 7 350 (17779). The i7-14701E, by contrast, matches the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H exactly (33201, 0% delta) and sits within 0.4% of the Intel Core i7-13650HX (33089).

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates a clear hierarchy: the Intel Core i7-14701E outperforms the Intel Core 5 221TE across every recorded workload. The i7-14701E delivers roughly double the average benchmark score (33206 versus 17860) and sits 12 percentile points higher among all CPUs (83rd versus 71st).

The Core 5 221TE does offer advantages in specific areas that are not captured by raw performance scores. Its 10 cores provide more physical cores than the i7-14701E's 8, and its 45 watt TDP is lower than the 65 watt TDP of the i7-14701E. These factors point toward the Core 5 221TE being suited for scenarios where power efficiency or core count matters more than peak performance.

The i7-14701E, with its higher clocks, larger caches, and superior per-core performance, is the stronger choice for applications that respond to single-thread speed and cache capacity. The data shows no workload where the Core 5 221TE wins, so any decision favoring it must rest on non-benchmark factors such as power draw, physical core count, or launch MSRP.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 221TE | Intel Core i7-14701E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 8 |

| Base clock | 1.80 GHz | 2.60 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Die size | 215 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not recorded |

| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Release date | 2025-01-12 | 2024-06-30 |

| Launch MSRP | $232 | Not recorded |

| Part number | SRVQS | Q49FSRNJK |

Both processors share the same socket (Intel Socket 1700), process node (10 nm), foundry (Intel), L1 cache (80 KB per core), memory support (DDR4, DDR5), memory bus (dual-channel), ECC support (yes), PCIe configuration (Gen 5, 16 lanes CPU only), market segment (Desktop), production status (Active), and multiplier unlock status (false).

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14701E wins every benchmark category in the database. Its largest margins appear in prime number finding (66.5% ahead), single-thread performance (59.7% ahead), and physics simulation (59.3% ahead). These results indicate strength in integer-heavy, single-threaded, and simulation workloads. The i7-14701E also leads by approximately 49% across all Cinebench multicore tests, showing consistent multicore dominance that scales with thread utilization.

The Intel Core 5 221TE does not win any recorded benchmark, but its specifications suggest specific use cases. Its 10 physical cores provide more core-level parallelism than the i7-14701E's 8 cores, which may benefit workloads that scale with physical core count rather than thread count. Its lower 45 watt TDP indicates it draws less power under load, making it suitable for systems with tighter thermal or power budgets. The 215 mm² die size is smaller than the i7-14701E's 257 mm², which can influence manufacturing costs and thermal density.

For builders choosing between these two Socket 1700 processors, the data points to the i7-14701E for any performance-sensitive application. The Core 5 221TE holds appeal for systems prioritizing lower power consumption or a specific launch MSRP of $232, but the recorded benchmarks show it trails the i7-14701E by substantial margins in every measured test.