Intel Core 5 221TE vs Intel Core i5-14400F Comparison

Intel Core 5 221TE and Intel Core i5-14400F are both 10-core, 16-thread desktop processors on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, yet the recorded benchmark data separates them clearly. The Core i5-14400F wins every single one of the 17 head-to-head comparisons, with margins ranging from roughly a third to more than half. The Core 5 221TE counters with a lower thermal envelope, integrated graphics, and a higher boost clock, but the performance gap in the database is decisive.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14400F wins all 17 recorded head-to-head benchmarks, leaving no workload category where the Core 5 221TE takes a victory. In multi-threaded tests, the i5-14400F delivers scores that are consistently about 48% higher, as seen in Cinebench R23 multicore (21645 vs 11305) and PassMark multithread (25470 vs 13301). This pattern holds across rendering, encryption, compression, and mathematical workloads, indicating a uniform advantage in parallel processing.

The Core 5 221TE does not win any benchmark, but its profile still has a purpose. It carries a 45 W TDP compared to the i5-14400F's 65 W, and it includes UHD Graphics 730, whereas the i5-14400F has no integrated graphics. For systems that require a discrete GPU or rely on the processor's own graphics output, the 221TE offers a functional path that the i5-14400F cannot match. The data shows the i5-14400F as the outright performance leader, while the 221TE positions itself as a lower-power alternative with onboard display capability.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same 10 nm process node, Intel foundry, and a 215 mm² die size, but their underlying designs diverge in codename and cache structure. The Core 5 221TE is based on Bartlett Lake, while the Core i5-14400F uses Raptor Lake-R, part of the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. Each core in both chips has 80 KB of L1 cache and 1.25 MB of L2 cache, but the shared L3 cache differs: the 221TE has 24 MB, the i5-14400F has 20 MB.

The 221TE's larger L3 cache does not translate into a performance advantage in the recorded scores. The i5-14400F instead relies on a higher base clock of 2.50 GHz versus 1.80 GHz for the 221TE, though the 221TE boosts higher at 5.00 GHz compared to 4.70 GHz. The i5-14400F also carries a higher TDP of 65 W, which allows it to sustain more aggressive power delivery. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and both offer ECC memory support plus PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The 221TE alone provides integrated UHD Graphics 730; the i5-14400F lists N/A for integrated graphics.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single margin in the comparison appears in PassMark single-thread testing, where the i5-14400F scores 3701 against 1734 for the 221TE, a delta of 53.1%. That gap illustrates the i5-14400F's superior per-core efficiency, despite the 221TE's higher boost clock. Cinebench R23 single-core shows the same story at a 47.8% delta (3055 vs 1596), confirming that the i5-14400F extracts more performance from each core in practice.

In multi-core workloads, the i5-14400F maintains a nearly uniform 47.8% lead across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multicore tests, with scores of 2181 vs 1139, 9090 vs 4748, and 21645 vs 11305 respectively. PassMark multithread follows at 25470 vs 13301, also a 47.8% delta. The i5-14400F's advantage in floating-point math reaches 61319 vs 31661 (48.4%), and integer math shows 81524 vs 42303 (48.1%). Data compression favors the i5-14400F by 50.3% (315521 vs 156682), while extended instructions show a 51.6% gap (19937 vs 9655).

Two tests show narrower margins. PassMark find prime numbers has a 31.4% delta (86 vs 59), and PassMark physics shows a 35.9% delta (1523 vs 977). These smaller gaps still favor the i5-14400F, but they indicate that the 221TE is relatively less disadvantaged in integer-heavy or physics-oriented calculations. Data encryption completes the sweep at a 47.1% delta (16949 vs 8963), and random string sorting lands at 48.2% (32680 vs 16929). Across all 17 benchmarks, the i5-14400F never falls below a 31.4% lead.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several recorded specification fields. The Core 5 221TE has a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz; the Core i5-14400F runs at 2.50 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost. TDP is 45 W for the 221TE and 65 W for the i5-14400F. L3 cache is 24 MB on the 221TE versus 20 MB on the i5-14400F. Integrated graphics: the 221TE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the i5-14400F has none.

The i5-14400F lists a memory bandwidth of null in the database, whereas the 221TE records 76.8 GB/s. Both support DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel memory, ECC, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The 221TE has a launch date of 2025-01-12 and a launch MSRP of $232; the i5-14400F launched on 2024-01-07 with a launch MSRP of $196. The 221TE part number is SRVQS, while the i5-14400F lists SRN3RSRN47. Both are desktop parts, both are active in production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 5 221TE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core i5-14400F has 20 MB.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The Core 5 221TE includes UHD Graphics 730. The Core i5-14400F lists N/A for integrated graphics, meaning it has none.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Core 5 221TE has a 45 W TDP, and the Core i5-14400F has a 65 W TDP.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Core 5 221TE boosts to 5.00 GHz, which is higher than the Core i5-14400F's 4.70 GHz boost clock.

Q: How large is the performance gap in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The Core i5-14400F scores 21645 versus the Core 5 221TE's 11305, a delta of 47.8% in favor of the i5-14400F.

Q: Do both processors use the same socket?

A: Yes, both the Core 5 221TE and the Core i5-14400F use the Intel Socket 1700.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i5-14400F is the clear choice for any workload that prioritizes raw performance. The database records a 47.8% lead in Cinebench R23 multicore, a 53.1% lead in PassMark single-thread, and wins in all 17 head-to-head benchmarks. Its higher base clock and 65 W TDP enable consistent execution across rendering, encryption, and math-heavy tasks. The i5-14400F also sits at the 83rd percentile versus all CPUs, compared to the 71st for the 221TE, and its average benchmark score of 32279 nearly doubles the 221TE's 17860.

The Intel Core 5 221TE has a narrower appeal. It offers a lower 45 W TDP, a larger 24 MB L3 cache, a higher 5.00 GHz boost clock, and integrated UHD Graphics 730, all of which the i5-14400F lacks. For a build that needs onboard display output or operates under tighter thermal constraints, the 221TE provides a functional alternative. But the benchmark data is unambiguous: every recorded test favors the i5-14400F, often by margins near or above 48%. Users who need computing throughput should select the i5-14400F; users who need integrated graphics or lower power draw should look to the 221TE.