Intel Core 5 221TE vs Intel Core 7 150UL Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare between the Intel Core 5 221TE and the Intel Core 7 150UL?

A: Both processors have 10 cores. The Core 5 221TE supports 16 threads, while the Core 7 150UL supports 12 threads.

Q: What are the maximum boost clock speeds for these two processors?

A: Both the Intel Core 5 221TE and the Intel Core 7 150UL have a maximum boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher thermal design power (TDP)?

A: The Intel Core 5 221TE has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Intel Core 7 150UL has a TDP of 15 watts.

Q: How does the L3 cache size differ between the two?

A: The Intel Core 5 221TE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, whereas the Intel Core 7 150UL has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Core 5 221TE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 7 150UL does not.

Q: What are the PCIe specifications for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 221TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core 7 150UL supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only).

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages within Intel's lineup. The Intel Core 5 221TE is based on the Bartlett Lake codename, belonging to the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation. In contrast, the Intel Core 7 150UL is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS codename, and belongs to the Core 7 (Raptor Lake-PS) generation.

Both are manufactured on a 10 nm process node by Intel. The Core 5 221TE has a die size of 215 mm², while the die size for the Core 7 150UL is not recorded in the database. The L1 and L2 cache configurations are identical: 80 KB per core for L1 and 1.25 MB per core for L2. However, the shared L3 cache differs substantially, with the Core 5 221TE offering 24 MB and the Core 7 150UL offering 12 MB.

The integrated graphics also differ. The Core 5 221TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core 7 150UL features Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. This suggests a different focus for graphical output capabilities between the two chips.

Memory support is similar, with both processors supporting DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Core 5 221TE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Core 7 150UL does not have a memory bandwidth figure in the database. The Core 5 221TE also includes ECC memory support, a feature absent on the Core 7 150UL.

PCIe capabilities differ as well. The Core 5 221TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), whereas the Core 7 150UL supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). This indicates a significant difference in available I/O bandwidth and expansion potential.

The release dates differ, with the Core 7 150UL released on 2024-04-07 and the Core 5 221TE released on 2025-01-12. Both processors are currently listed as Active in production status and are intended for the Desktop market segment.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Core 5 221TE and the Intel Core 7 150UL. The Core 7 150UL has an empty benchmark array, meaning no recorded scores exist for it in any test. Consequently, the wins count for both processors is zero in direct comparison.

The Core 5 221TE, however, has an extensive set of benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score is 17860, placing it at the 71st percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Core 7 150UL has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile, though this percentile is based on its overall position rather than benchmark performance.

For the Core 5 221TE, the data shows strong multi-core performance in Cinebench tests. It scores 1139 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 4748 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. The R23 multi-core score is 11305. Single-core scores are 160 in R15, 670 in R20, and 1596 in R23.

PassMark results for the Core 5 221TE show a multithread score of 13301 and a single-thread score of 1734. Other PassMark tests include data compression at 156682, data encryption at 8963, extended instructions at 9655, find prime numbers at 59, floating point math at 31661, integer math at 42303, physics at 977, and random string sorting at 16929.

Since the Core 7 150UL lacks any recorded benchmarks, a numerical comparison of wins or losses between the two processors cannot be established from the available data. The analysis must rely on the architectural and specification differences to infer relative performance.

Specification Differences

The following fields show clear differences between the Intel Core 5 221TE and the Intel Core 7 150UL:

• Threads: The Core 5 221TE has 16 threads, the Core 7 150UL has 12 threads.
• Base clock: The Core 5 221TE has a base clock of 1.80 GHz, the Core 7 150UL has a base clock of 1.70 GHz.
• TDP: The Core 5 221TE has a TDP of 45 watts, the Core 7 150UL has a TDP of 15 watts.
• Codename: The Core 5 221TE uses Bartlett Lake, the Core 7 150UL uses Raptor Lake-PS.
• Generation: The Core 5 221TE is Core 5 (Bartlett Lake), the Core 7 150UL is Core 7 (Raptor Lake-PS).
• Die size: The Core 5 221TE is 215 mm², the Core 7 150UL is not recorded.
• L3 cache: The Core 5 221TE has 24 MB shared, the Core 7 150UL has 12 MB shared.
• Memory bandwidth: The Core 5 221TE has 76.8 GB/s, the Core 7 150UL has no recorded value.
• ECC memory: The Core 5 221TE supports it, the Core 7 150UL does not.
• PCIe: The Core 5 221TE supports Gen 5 with 16 lanes, the Core 7 150UL supports Gen 4 with 8 lanes.
• Integrated graphics: The Core 5 221TE uses UHD Graphics 730, the Core 7 150UL uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.
• Release date: The Core 5 221TE released on 2025-01-12, the Core 7 150UL released on 2024-04-07.
• Launch MSRP: The Core 5 221TE has a launch MSRP of $232, the Core 7 150UL has no recorded launch MSRP.
• Part number: The Core 5 221TE is SRVQS, the Core 7 150UL is unknown.

Fields that are identical include cores (10), boost clock (5.00 GHz), process node (10 nm), foundry (Intel), L1 cache (80 KB per core), L2 cache (1.25 MB per core), memory support (DDR4, DDR5), memory bus (Dual-channel), socket (Intel Socket 1700), manufacturer (Intel), market segment (Desktop), production status (Active), and multiplier unlocked (false for both).

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core 5 221TE holds clear advantages in several areas. Its higher thread count of 16 versus 12 gives it more simultaneous processing capability for heavily threaded workloads. The larger 24 MB L3 cache compared to 12 MB on the Core 7 150UL can improve performance in tasks that benefit from larger cache footprints, such as data compression and certain scientific computations.

The Core 5 221TE also wins on connectivity and expansion. Its PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes provides double the lane count and a newer generation compared to the Core 7 150UL's PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes. This makes the Core 5 221TE more suitable for systems with multiple high-bandwidth devices such as modern graphics cards and NVMe storage.

ECC memory support on the Core 5 221TE gives it an edge in reliability-sensitive applications like servers or workstations where data integrity is critical. The Core 7 150UL lacks this feature.

The Core 5 221TE has a higher base clock of 1.80 GHz versus 1.70 GHz on the Core 7 150UL, which can provide a small advantage in tasks that rely on sustained clock speeds rather than boost behavior.

The Intel Core 7 150UL wins on power efficiency. Its 15-watt TDP is significantly lower than the 45-watt TDP of the Core 5 221TE. This makes the Core 7 150UL more suitable for compact, low-power desktop systems where heat dissipation and energy consumption are primary concerns.

The Core 7 150UL also features Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, which is a more capable integrated graphics solution compared to the UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 221TE. This gives the Core 7 150UL an advantage in tasks that rely on the integrated GPU, such as basic media playback or light graphical workloads without a discrete graphics card.

The Core 7 150UL also has an earlier release date, which may indicate a more mature platform in the field, though the Core 5 221TE is newer.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core 5 221TE and the Intel Core 7 150UL serve different purposes within the desktop market, despite sharing the same core count and socket.

The Core 5 221TE is positioned for performance-oriented desktop builds. Its higher TDP of 45 watts, 16 threads, larger 24 MB L3 cache, PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes, and ECC memory capability point toward a processor designed for demanding workloads, content creation, and systems requiring robust I/O and data integrity. Its benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11305 and an average benchmark score of 17860, place it at the 71st percentile among all CPUs. With a launch MSRP of $232, it offers a specific feature set for builders who need those capabilities.

The Core 7 150UL, with its 15-watt TDP, is geared toward efficiency-focused desktop systems. The lower power draw makes it suitable for small form factor or always-on machines where thermal and energy constraints are paramount. Its Iris Xe Graphics 96EU provides better integrated graphics performance, reducing the need for a discrete GPU in basic systems. However, the lack of recorded benchmark data means its actual performance level cannot be quantified from the database.

Users seeking raw processing power, higher memory bandwidth, more PCIe lanes, and ECC support should select the Intel Core 5 221TE. Users prioritizing low power consumption and better integrated graphics in a compact desktop should consider the Intel Core 7 150UL, provided they accept the trade-offs in L3 cache size, PCIe capabilities, and the absence of ECC support. The choice ultimately hinges on whether the workload favors the Core 5 221TE's performance and expansion features or the Core 7 150UL's efficiency and integrated graphics.