Intel Core 5 221E vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 5 221E and Intel Core i5-14501TE represent two distinct tiers within the same socket, and the recorded data shows a decisive performance gap across every measured workload. The Core 5 221E delivers a multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 25933, while the Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, making direct percentage comparisons impossible for the Raptor Lake part. However, the Core 5 221E's percentile ranking of 87 versus the Core i5-14501TE's 50th percentile placement provides a clear hierarchical signal: the 221E sits far above the midpoint of all CPUs, while the 14501TE sits exactly at the median.

The Core 5 221E's single-core Cinebench R23 result of 3661, combined with its boost clock of 5.20 GHz, indicates strong per-thread performance. The Core i5-14501TE boosts to 5.10 GHz, a modest 0.10 GHz deficit, yet the database contains no single-thread scores for the 14501TE to quantify the impact. In PassMark single-thread testing, the 221E records 4147 points, placing it well above typical desktop processors. The 14501TE's absence from the benchmark table means the analysis must rely on architectural differences and core counts to infer relative standing.

Multi-threaded workloads amplify the gap. The 221E produces 30510 in PassMark multithread, 117813 in integer math, and 79028 in floating point math. These figures reflect a 14-core, 20-thread configuration. The 14501TE uses 6 cores and 12 threads, a 57% reduction in core count and a 40% reduction in thread count. Even without direct benchmark data, the core count disparity alone suggests the 221E will dominate in heavily parallel tasks. The 221E also posts 10891 in Cinebench R20 multi-core and 2613 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, while the 14501TE has no comparable entries.

The 221E's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its positioning. It sits 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, and 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen 9 270. The Intel Core i9-13905H trails by 0.4%. These deltas are small, indicating the 221E performs in a tight cluster with those four processors. The 14501TE has no nearest rivals listed, reflecting its lack of benchmark data and mid-tier percentile placement.

In encryption and compression tasks, the 221E achieves 19205 in PassMark data encryption and 324285 in data compression. The 14501TE offers no corresponding scores. Extended instruction workloads show 18216 for the 221E, while random string sorting reaches 37686. Prime number finding yields 173, and physics simulation scores 2230. Every one of these figures belongs exclusively to the 221E, reinforcing that the head-to-head comparison is one-sided in the current database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share the Intel Socket 1700 platform and both use Intel's 10 nm process node, but their underlying designs diverge significantly. The Core 5 221E carries the codename Bartlett Lake and belongs to the Core 5 generation, while the Core i5-14501TE uses Raptor Lake-R and sits in the Core 14th Gen series. Bartlett Lake represents a newer architectural lineage, although the database does not specify the exact microarchitecture details beyond the codename. Raptor Lake-R is a refresh of the Raptor Lake architecture, which the database explicitly labels as the 14501TE's architecture.

Core configuration separates the two clearly. The 221E packs 14 cores and 20 threads, while the 14501TE uses 6 cores and 12 threads. This 8-core, 8-thread difference shapes every performance outcome. The 221E's L2 cache is listed as 2 MB per core, whereas the 14501TE has 1.25 MB per core. Both share 24 MB of L3 cache and 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The 221E's larger per-core L2 allocation benefits workloads that repeatedly access working sets, though the database does not provide benchmark data for the 14501TE to demonstrate this advantage.

Clock speeds show the 221E with a 2.70 GHz base and 5.20 GHz boost, against the 14501TE's 2.20 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost. The 221E holds a 0.50 GHz base clock lead and a 0.10 GHz boost clock lead. Thermal design power differs substantially: the 221E is rated at 65 watts, while the 14501TE draws only 45 watts. This lower TDP for the 14501TE suggests a more power-constrained design, which may limit sustained multi-core performance despite the smaller core count. The database lists die sizes of 257 mm² for the 221E and 215 mm² for the 14501TE, a 42 mm² difference that aligns with the larger core cluster in the 221E.

Integrated graphics also differ. The 221E uses Intel UHD Graphics 730, while the 14501TE steps up to Intel UHD Graphics 770. The database provides no performance figures for either iGPU, so the analysis cannot quantify the graphical gap. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and both enable ECC memory. The 221E lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the 14501TE has no bandwidth figure recorded. PCIe support is identical: Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU.

Both parts are locked, with multiplier unlocking disabled. The 221E has a launch MSRP of $232, while the 14501TE has no launch MSRP listed. The 221E's release date is 2025-01-12, and the 14501TE's release date is 2024-06-30, making the 14501TE roughly six months older. Both processors remain in active production. The 221E's part number is SRQDVQ659, and the 14501TE's is Q49KSRNJN. The 221E is marked as Desktop market segment, matching the 14501TE's Desktop designation.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 221E wins decisively in multi-threaded rendering, content creation, and scientific computing. Its 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with a 65-watt TDP, deliver Cinebench R23 multi-core scores of 25933 and PassMark multithread results of 30510. The architecture's 2 MB per-core L2 cache supports data-heavy loops, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth feeds the larger core count effectively. The 5.20 GHz boost clock ensures that even lightly threaded tasks see high single-core throughput, as evidenced by the 3661 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 4147 PassMark single-thread score.

The 221E also dominates in integer math, floating point math, encryption, compression, and extended instruction workloads, based on the recorded PassMark results. These strengths point toward video encoding, 3D rendering, data compression pipelines, and cryptographic operations. The 87th percentile ranking across all CPUs confirms that this processor belongs in the upper tier of desktop hardware. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.4% of its average benchmark score, include AMD Ryzen 7 7700, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Ryzen 9 270, and Intel Core i9-13905H, placing the 221E in competition with high-end mainstream parts.

The Core i5-14501TE wins in power efficiency scenarios. Its 45-watt TDP, 20 watts lower than the 221E, makes it suitable for thermally constrained systems. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration draws less power while still providing a 5.10 GHz boost clock for responsive single-threaded tasks. The UHD Graphics 770 iGPU, a step above the 221E's UHD Graphics 730, offers potentially better integrated graphics output, though the database provides no benchmark scores to confirm this. The 14501TE's 50th percentile ranking indicates average performance relative to all CPUs, making it a middle-tier option for basic productivity, office workloads, and light multitasking.

The 14501TE's smaller die size of 215 mm² versus 257 mm² suggests lower manufacturing cost and potentially simpler cooling requirements, though the database does not include pricing or thermal data beyond TDP. Its 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache is smaller than the 221E's 2 MB, but for workloads that fit within a smaller working set, the difference may be negligible. Both processors support the same DDR4 and DDR5 memory types and the same PCIe Gen 5 lanes, so platform compatibility is identical.

For users prioritizing raw compute throughput, the 221E is the clear choice based on the recorded benchmarks. For users prioritizing low power draw and integrated graphics capability, the 14501TE holds advantages. The absence of any benchmark scores for the 14501TE in the database means its actual performance in the listed tests remains unmeasured, and the analysis must rely on core counts, clock speeds, and cache specifications to infer its capabilities.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count difference between the Intel Core 5 221E and Intel Core i5-14501TE?

A: The Core 5 221E has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How do the boost clocks compare?

A: The Core 5 221E boosts to 5.20 GHz, and the Core i5-14501TE boosts to 5.10 GHz, a 0.10 GHz advantage for the 221E.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Core 5 221E and Core i5-14501TE support ECC memory, and both support DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration.

Q: Which processor has a higher integrated graphics model?

A: The Core i5-14501TE uses Intel UHD Graphics 770, while the Core 5 221E uses Intel UHD Graphics 730.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Core 5 221E has a TDP of 65 watts, and the Core i5-14501TE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: What are the release dates for each processor?

A: The Core 5 221E was released on 2025-01-12, and the Core i5-14501TE was released on 2024-06-30.

Q: Do both use the same socket?

A: Yes, both processors use Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each?

A: Both processors have 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the process node for both chips?

A: Both use Intel's 10 nm process node.

Q: Does the Core 5 221E have benchmark scores in the database?

A: Yes, the Core 5 221E has extensive benchmark scores, while the Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 221E | Intel Core i5-14501TE |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 14 | 6 |

| Threads | 20 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.70 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 45 W |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-R |

| Architecture | (not specified) | Raptor Lake |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Die Size | 257 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | (not specified) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2024-06-30 |

| Launch MSRP | $232 | (not specified) |

| Part Number | SRQDVQ659 | Q49KSRNJN |

The two processors share the same socket, process node, foundry, L1 cache size, L3 cache size, memory support type, memory bus width, ECC support, PCIe generation and lane count, market segment, production status, and multiplier unlocked status. The Core 5 221E holds advantages in core count, thread count, base clock, boost clock, die size, L2 cache per core, and memory bandwidth. The Core i5-14501TE counters with a lower TDP, a higher-tier integrated graphics model, and an earlier release date. The database records no benchmark scores for the 14501TE, which limits direct performance comparisons to the 221E's measured results.