Intel Core 5 220H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 5 220H and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 occupy different corners of the mobile processor market, but the recorded data shows a stark imbalance in measured performance. The Intel part has a complete set of benchmark scores across Cinebench and Passmark suites, while the Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has no recorded benchmark entries in the database. This means every direct comparison must rely on the Intel chip's scores and the Qualcomm part's architectural specifications alone.

The Intel Core 5 220H delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11198 and a single-core score of 1853. Its Cinebench R20 results show 7812 multi-core and 1102 single-core, while Cinebench R15 records 1835 multi-core and 262 single-core. These scores place the processor at the 80th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 28574. The nearest rivals in the database include the AMD EPYC 7203P at 28583 (a delta of 0%), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS at 28549 (0.1% behind), the Intel Xeon E-2436 at 28530 (0.2% behind), and the Intel Core i5-12600 at 28646 (0.3% ahead). The Intel Core 5 220H sits essentially level with these competitors, within a 0.3% band.

Passmark results for the Intel chip show a multi-thread score of 21884, single-thread score of 3405, integer math at 73555, floating point math at 51671, data compression at 247921, data encryption at 15216, extended instructions at 14642, find prime numbers at 82, physics at 1478, and random string sorting at 28438. The data compression score of 247921 is particularly strong, indicating efficient handling of compression workloads. The encryption score of 15216 and extended instructions score of 14642 suggest solid cryptographic and SIMD performance, while the prime number finding score of 82 is comparatively low, reflecting a weaker performance in that specific integer workload.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has zero recorded benchmarks, an average benchmark score of 0, and sits at the 50th percentile with no nearest rivals listed. The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two processors, and the wins counter shows 0 for both. This absence of measured data means the Snapdragon's actual performance cannot be quantified against the Intel chip's results. The only basis for comparison is the architectural information in the specification fields.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 220H wins in every measurable category because it is the only processor with benchmark data. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11198 indicates strong sustained multi-threaded performance, which suits rendering, video encoding, and compilation workloads. The single-core score of 1853 points to capable responsiveness in lightly threaded applications such as web browsing, office productivity, and legacy software. Passmark integer math at 73555 and floating point math at 51671 show balanced arithmetic capability across both integer and floating-point domains.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 cannot claim any benchmark wins in the database because no scores are recorded. Its architectural specifications suggest it is designed for different priorities. The 12 cores and 12 threads indicate no simultaneous multi-threading, unlike the Intel chip's 12 cores and 16 threads. The base clock of 3.80 GHz is higher than the Intel part's 2.70 GHz, but the boost clock of 4.20 GHz is lower than the Intel chip's 4.90 GHz. The Snapdragon's TDP of 35 watts is lower than the Intel chip's 45 watts, which could indicate a power efficiency advantage, but without benchmark data, that cannot be confirmed through performance measurements.

The Intel chip's memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus provides flexibility across platforms, while the Snapdragon supports only LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. The Snapdragon's PCIe implementation is Gen 4 with 12 lanes, while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 8 lanes. These differences favor the Intel chip for raw PCIe bandwidth potential but favor the Snapdragon for total lane count.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different foundries and process nodes. The Intel Core 5 220H uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 uses a 4 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. The smaller process node typically allows for better power efficiency and higher transistor density, but the database does not include transistor counts or die sizes for either part.

The Intel chip is built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-H codename and belongs to the Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. The Qualcomm part uses the Oryon codename and belongs to the Snapdragon X (Elite) generation. The Intel chip has a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3. The Snapdragon has 288 KB L1 per core, 12 MB L2 per module, and 6 MB shared L3. The Intel part's larger L3 cache of 18 MB versus 6 MB could benefit workloads with large working sets, while the Snapdragon's larger L1 and L2 caches per core or module could improve per-core hit rates.

The Intel Core 5 220H uses socket Intel BGA 1744, while the Snapdragon uses Qualcomm BGA 2073. The Intel part integrates Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units, while the Snapdragon integrates Adreno X1-85 graphics. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, whereas the Snapdragon supports only LPDDR5X. The Snapdragon's memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s is explicitly recorded, while the Intel part's memory bandwidth is not listed.

The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $342, while the Snapdragon has no launch MSRP recorded. The Intel part is unlocked? No, the multiplier is not unlocked for either processor. The Intel chip's part number is SRQ6SQ5MM, and the Snapdragon's is X1E84100. Both are listed as Active in production status and target the mobile market segment.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 220H have benchmark scores in the database?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 5 220H has 17 recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and Passmark tests, with an average benchmark score of 28574 and a percentile rank of 80 among all CPUs.

Q: Does the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 have any benchmark scores?

A: No, the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has zero recorded benchmark entries, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile rank with no nearest rivals listed.

Q: How do the core counts compare between the two processors?

A: Both processors have 12 cores. The Intel Core 5 220H has 16 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has 12 threads, indicating the Intel part supports simultaneous multi-threading and the Qualcomm part does not.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: The Intel Core 5 220H has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. The Intel chip boosts higher, while the Qualcomm chip has a higher base clock.

Q: How do the cache configurations differ?

A: The Intel Core 5 220H has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has 288 KB L1 per core, 12 MB L2 per module, and 6 MB shared L3.

Q: Which processor has a smaller manufacturing process node?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel Core 5 220H uses a 10 nm process node from Intel. The 4 nm node is smaller than the 10 nm node.

The Verdict

The data in the database clearly favors the Intel Core 5 220H for anyone seeking measured performance. It has a full set of benchmark scores, a strong 80th percentile ranking, and an average benchmark score of 28574. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its average score, which places it in the same performance tier as the AMD EPYC 7203P, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS, Intel Xeon E-2436, and Intel Core i5-12600. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11198 and single-core score of 1853 indicate solid productivity performance.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has no benchmark data, so it cannot be verified against any measured workload. Its 50th percentile rank and average benchmark score of 0 reflect the absence of recorded results rather than actual performance. The Snapdragon's architectural specifications, including a 4 nm process, 12 cores, 12 threads, 3.80 GHz base clock, and 4.20 GHz boost clock, suggest a different design philosophy focused on efficiency, but the database provides no evidence of its real-world capability.

For users who require verified multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, the Intel Core 5 220H is the only option with supporting data. For those considering the Snapdragon X1E-84-100, the lack of benchmark results means performance expectations cannot be grounded in measured outcomes. The Intel chip also offers a larger shared L3 cache of 18 MB versus 6 MB, PCIe Gen 5 support, and a higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Snapdragon counters with a smaller process node, higher base clock, lower TDP of 35 watts versus 45 watts, and a higher memory bandwidth figure of 135.2 GB/s, but none of those specifications translate into recorded performance wins.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 220H | Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 12 | 12 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.70 GHz | 3.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | 4.20 GHz |

| TDP | 45 watts | 35 watts |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | Qualcomm BGA 2073 |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-H | Oryon |

| Generation | Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) | Snapdragon X (Elite) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 288 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 12 MB (per module) |

| L3 Cache | 18 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 135.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 12 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | Adreno X1-85 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | 2024-12-17 | 2024-04-23 |

| Launch MSRP | $342 | Not listed |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | SRQ6SQ5MM | X1E84100 |