Intel Core 5 220H vs Intel Core i9-14901TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data does not include any direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Core 5 220H and the Intel Core i9-14901TE. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither processor shows wins in a direct comparison. However, the Intel Core 5 220H has a full set of benchmark scores, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible for individual test results.

The Intel Core 5 220H posts an average benchmark score of 28574 across its tested workloads, placing it in the 80th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD EPYC 7203P at 28583 average score with a 0% delta, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS at 28549 with a 0.1% delta, the Intel Xeon E-2436 at 28530 with a 0.2% delta, and the Intel Core i5-12600 at 28646 with a -0.3% delta. These figures indicate the Core 5 220H sits in a tightly contested band of processors, within a fraction of a percent of several alternatives.

The Core 5 220H delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11198 and a single-core score of 1853. In Cinebench R20, it scores 7812 multi-core and 1102 single-core. The Cinebench R15 results show 1835 multi-core and 262 single-core. PassMark results for the Core 5 220H include a multi-thread score of 21884, a single-thread score of 3405, integer math at 73555, floating point math at 51671, data compression at 247921, data encryption at 15216, extended instructions at 14642, find prime numbers at 82, physics at 1478, and random string sorting at 28438.

Since the Core i9-14901TE has no recorded benchmark scores, the analysis must rely on architectural and specification differences rather than performance measurements. The database shows the Core i9-14901TE at the 50th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 0, which reflects missing data rather than actual performance. The Core 5 220H, by contrast, has a measured presence in the 80th percentile, indicating that in the database's recorded workloads, it performs above the majority of all CPUs.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the Raptor Lake architecture and are built on Intel's 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry. The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H codename, while the Core i9-14901TE uses the Raptor Lake-R codename. Both belong to the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. The Core 5 220H is a mobile segment part with an Intel BGA 1744 socket, while the Core i9-14901TE is a desktop segment part with an Intel Socket 1700.

The core configurations differ substantially. The Core 5 220H has 12 cores and 16 threads, while the Core i9-14901TE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Both processors feature 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core. The shared L3 cache differs: the Core 5 220H has 18 MB shared, while the Core i9-14901TE has 36 MB shared, double the amount.

Clock speeds also differ. The Core 5 220H has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Core i9-14901TE has a lower base clock of 2.30 GHz but a higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Both have a 45 W TDP.

Memory support is identical on paper: both support DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. However, the Core i9-14901TE supports ECC memory, while the Core 5 220H does not. PCIe connectivity differs: the Core 5 220H offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the Core i9-14901TE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 5 220H uses Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while the Core i9-14901TE uses UHD Graphics 770. The die size is recorded only for the Core i9-14901TE at 257 mm²; the Core 5 220H has no die size listed. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both are currently active in production. The Core 5 220H was released on 2024-12-17, while the Core i9-14901TE was released earlier on 2024-06-30. The Core 5 220H has a launch MSRP of $342; the Core i9-14901TE has no recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 5 220H has 12 cores, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE has 8 cores. Both have 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, which is higher than the Core 5 220H's boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-14901TE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14901TE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 5 220H does not.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, double the 18 MB shared L3 cache of the Intel Core 5 220H.

Q: What is the market segment for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 220H is a mobile processor with an Intel BGA 1744 socket, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE is a desktop processor with an Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Are there benchmark scores recorded for the Intel Core i9-14901TE?

A: No, the database shows no benchmark scores for the Intel Core i9-14901TE. The Intel Core 5 220H has a full set of recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench and PassMark tests.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in the following recorded specifications:

• Cores: Core 5 220H has 12 cores; Core i9-14901TE has 8 cores.
• Base clock: Core 5 220H is 2.70 GHz; Core i9-14901TE is 2.30 GHz.
• Boost clock: Core 5 220H is 4.90 GHz; Core i9-14901TE is 5.50 GHz.
• Socket: Core 5 220H uses Intel BGA 1744; Core i9-14901TE uses Intel Socket 1700.
• Codename: Core 5 220H is Raptor Lake-H; Core i9-14901TE is Raptor Lake-R.
• L3 cache: Core 5 220H has 18 MB shared; Core i9-14901TE has 36 MB shared.
• Die size: Core 5 220H has no recorded die size; Core i9-14901TE is 257 mm².
• ECC memory: Core 5 220H does not support ECC; Core i9-14901TE supports ECC.
• PCIe lanes: Core 5 220H has Gen 5, 8 Lanes (CPU only); Core i9-14901TE has Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only).
• Integrated graphics: Core 5 220H uses Iris Xe Graphics 80EU; Core i9-14901TE uses UHD Graphics 770.
• Market segment: Core 5 220H is Mobile; Core i9-14901TE is Desktop.
• Release date: Core 5 220H is 2024-12-17; Core i9-14901TE is 2024-06-30.
• Launch MSRP: Core 5 220H is $342; Core i9-14901TE has no recorded launch MSRP.
• Percentile: Core 5 220H is in the 80th percentile of all CPUs; Core i9-14901TE is in the 50th percentile.

The two processors share the same threads count (16), TDP (45 W), architecture (Raptor Lake), process node (10 nm), foundry (Intel), L1 cache (80 KB per core), L2 cache (2 MB per core), memory support (DDR4, DDR5), memory bus (Dual-channel), multiplier unlocked status (false), and production status (Active).

The Verdict

The data in the database is asymmetric. The Intel Core 5 220H has a complete set of benchmark measurements, placing it in the 80th percentile of all CPUs with an average score of 28574. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has no recorded benchmark scores, leaving its average benchmark score at 0 and its percentile at 50, which reflects an absence of measurements rather than measured performance.

For users choosing based on recorded data, the Core 5 220H is the only processor with verified performance evidence. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11198 and single-core score of 1853, combined with a PassMark multi-thread score of 21884, indicate a capable processor that benchmarks in the same band as the AMD EPYC 7203P, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS, Intel Xeon E-2436, and Intel Core i5-12600, all within a 0.3% delta of each other.

The Core i9-14901TE cannot be evaluated on performance grounds from the database. Its specifications do show advantages in boost clock (5.50 GHz versus 4.90 GHz), L3 cache (36 MB versus 18 MB), ECC support, PCIe lane count (16 versus 8), and desktop socket placement. These are architectural advantages that could matter for specific workloads, but without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm their impact.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 220H wins in every category where measured data exists. It has more cores (12 versus 8), a higher base clock (2.70 GHz versus 2.30 GHz), and a full set of benchmark scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and PassMark tests. Its 80th percentile ranking places it above the majority of all CPUs in the database. The nearest rival comparison shows it within 0.3% of several established desktop and server processors, confirming that its measured performance is competitive in its class.

The Intel Core i9-14901TE wins on specification grounds in several areas. Its boost clock of 5.50 GHz exceeds the Core 5 220H by 0.60 GHz. Its 36 MB of shared L3 cache doubles the Core 5 220H's 18 MB. It supports ECC memory, which the Core 5 220H does not. It offers 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only) versus 8 lanes on the Core 5 220H. It uses a desktop socket (Intel Socket 1700) rather than a mobile BGA package, and it has a recorded die size of 257 mm², a detail absent for the Core 5 220H. It also uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core 5 220H uses Iris Xe Graphics 80EU.

The database does not record any benchmark wins for either processor in a direct head-to-head comparison. The Core 5 220H's wins come from its measured performance across all recorded workloads. The Core i9-14901TE's advantages are entirely in the specification sheet, not in measured results. For workloads that depend on single-thread boost frequency, larger L3 cache, ECC memory, or more PCIe lanes, the Core i9-14901TE presents a stronger specification profile. For any workload where measured performance matters, the Core 5 220H is the only processor with data supporting its standing.