Intel Core 5 220H vs Intel Core i7-14701E Comparison

The Intel Core i7-14701E is the clear performance leader in this matchup, winning 16 of the 17 recorded head-to-head benchmarks and posting a significantly higher average benchmark score of 33206 compared to 28574 for the Intel Core 5 220H. The data shows a decisive overall advantage for the desktop Core i7 part, driven by its higher boost clock and larger cache.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic separation between the two processors appears in the multi-threaded Cinebench R23 test. The Intel Core i7-14701E scores 22195, while the Intel Core 5 220H manages 11198, resulting in a substantial 49.5% deficit for the mobile chip. This is the largest percentage gap in the entire benchmark set and indicates a major difference in sustained multi-core workload performance.

Single-core performance also favors the Core i7-14701E, though by a lesser margin. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Core i7-14701E records 3133 against the Core 5 220H's 1853, a 40.9% difference. The Cinebench R15 and R20 single-core tests show smaller deltas of 16.8% and 16.2% respectively, with scores of 315 versus 262 and 1315 versus 1102.

The PassMark suite reinforces the Core i7-14701E's dominance across most workloads. In the physics test, the Core i7-14701E scores 2399, outperforming the Core 5 220H's 1478 by 38.4%. The prime number search test shows a 53.4% advantage for the Core i7-14701E, with scores of 176 and 82. Floating point math results are 16.5% higher for the Core i7-14701E, recording 61873 versus 51671.

The Core 5 220H manages to secure a single victory in the data encryption test. It scores 15216, which is 2.4% ahead of the Core i7-14701E's 14862. This is the only benchmark where the mobile processor leads, and the margin is modest compared to the deficits seen elsewhere.

Other results follow the same pattern. The Core i7-14701E leads in integer math by 9.6% (81325 vs 73555), in extended instructions by 21% (18528 vs 14642), and in data compression by 12.4% (282939 vs 247921). Multithread performance favors the Core i7-14701E by 16.2%, with scores of 26112 and 21884. Random string sorting shows the closest overall result, with the Core i7-14701E ahead by only 2.5%, scoring 29158 against 28438.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14701E is the preferred choice for almost every processing scenario based on the recorded data. Its 16 benchmark wins cover rendering, mathematical computation, data compression, and general multi-threaded workloads. The 49.5% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core is particularly relevant for video rendering and 3D modeling tasks, where the higher 5.40 boost clock and larger 33 MB L3 cache provide a clear advantage.

The Core i7-14701E also excels in single-threaded applications. The 40.9% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core indicates strong performance in lightly-threaded tasks such as productivity applications and legacy software. The physics simulation score of 2399, which is 38.4% higher, suggests better performance in game physics and simulation workloads.

The Intel Core 5 220H has a narrow use case based on the benchmarks. Its only win is in data encryption, where it scores 15216 versus 14862, a 2.4% margin. This suggests the mobile chip has a slight edge in encryption-related tasks, but the difference is small enough that real-world impact would be minimal. For all other tested workloads, the Core i7-14701E delivers higher scores, making it the stronger processor for general-purpose computing, content creation, and heavy multi-threaded applications.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E has an average benchmark score of 33206, while the Intel Core 5 220H has an average score of 28574.

Q: How large is the performance gap in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E scores 22195, which is 49.5% higher than the Intel Core 5 220H's score of 11198.

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 220H win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 5 220H wins the data encryption test with a score of 15216, which is 2.4% higher than the Core i7-14701E's score of 14862.

Q: What are the single-core scores in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E scores 3133 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and the Intel Core 5 220H scores 1853, a 40.9% difference.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E is in the 83rd percentile, while the Intel Core 5 220H is in the 80th percentile.

Q: How do the two processors compare in the PassMark multithread test?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E scores 26112, which is 16.2% higher than the Intel Core 5 220H's score of 21884.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The Intel Core 5 220H has 12 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads. The mobile chip has a base clock of 2.70 GHz, and the desktop chip has a base clock of 2.60 GHz. The boost clock is higher on the Core i7-14701E, reaching 5.40 GHz compared to 4.90 GHz on the Core 5 220H.

Thermal design power differs significantly, with the Core 5 220H rated at 45 watts and the Core i7-14701E at 65 watts. The socket types are different: the Core 5 220H uses Intel BGA 1744, while the Core i7-14701E uses Intel Socket 1700. The L3 cache is 18 MB shared on the Core 5 220H and 33 MB shared on the Core i7-14701E.

PCI Express support also differs. The Core 5 220H provides Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the Core i7-14701E provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are different, with the Core 5 220H using Iris Xe Graphics 80EU and the Core i7-14701E using UHD Graphics 770. The Core i7-14701E supports ECC memory, while the Core 5 220H does not. The launch MSRP for the Core 5 220H is $342; the Core i7-14701E has no listed launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and use a 10 nm process node from Intel. The Core 5 220H belongs to the Raptor Lake-H codename and the Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation, while the Core i7-14701E uses the Raptor Lake-R codename and the Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation.

The core configuration differs, with the Core 5 220H offering 12 cores versus 8 on the Core i7-14701E. Both have 16 threads, meaning the Core 5 220H relies more on additional physical cores, while the Core i7-14701E has fewer cores but a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core, and the L2 cache is also the same at 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is larger on the Core i7-14701E, with 33 MB shared versus 18 MB shared on the Core 5 220H.

The market segments differ, with the Core 5 220H designed for mobile platforms and the Core i7-14701E for desktop. The Core i7-14701E has a die size of 257 mm², while no die size is recorded for the Core 5 220H. The Core i7-14701E also supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the Core 5 220H. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel buses.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-14701E is the superior processor for nearly all workloads. Its 16 wins out of 17 benchmarks, combined with an average score of 33206 against 28574, shows a commanding lead. The 49.5% advantage in Cinebench R23 multi-core and the 40.9% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core demonstrate that the Core i7-14701E delivers stronger performance in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded applications.

The Intel Core 5 220H holds a single victory in data encryption, but the 2.4% margin is too small to offset the substantial deficits in every other test. The mobile chip's 12 cores do not compensate for its lower 4.90 boost clock and smaller 18 MB L3 cache when matched against the Core i7-14701E's 5.40 boost clock and 33 MB L3 cache.

Users seeking maximum performance in rendering, simulation, and general computing should choose the Intel Core i7-14701E based on its higher scores across the Cinebench and PassMark suites. The Core 5 220H remains a capable mobile processor, but the data indicates it trails the Core i7-14701E in every meaningful performance category except encryption, where it holds a marginal edge. The Core i7-14701E's 83rd percentile ranking versus the Core 5 220H's 80th percentile further confirms its higher standing in the overall CPU landscape.