Intel Core 5 220H vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 5 220H has 12 cores, while the Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores. Both processors support 16 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 220H reaches 4.90 GHz. The desktop part holds a 0.10 GHz advantage in maximum clock speed.

Q: How do their benchmark averages compare?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38149, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 220H averages 28574, which lands in the 80th percentile.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. Neither supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The Intel Core 5 220H has a 45 W TDP, while the Intel Core i5-14490F has a 65 W TDP. The mobile chip is designed for lower power envelopes.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core 5 220H includes Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, as indicated by N/A.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same fundamental architecture: Raptor Lake, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H codename and belongs to the Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. The Core i5-14490F uses the Raptor Lake-R codename and sits in the Core 14th Gen series under the Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation.

The core configurations differ notably. The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores and 16 threads, while the Core i5-14490F delivers 10 cores and 16 threads. This means the mobile chip relies on a mix of core types to reach its thread count, while the desktop chip achieves the same threading with fewer physical cores.

Cache hierarchies diverge significantly. The Core 5 220H provides 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i5-14490F offers 1.25 MB of L2 per core but compensates with a larger 24 MB shared L3 cache. Both have the same 80 KB per-core L1 cache.

The market positioning separates these parts clearly. The Core 5 220H is a mobile processor using the Intel BGA 1744 socket, while the Core i5-14490F is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700. The mobile chip includes Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, whereas the desktop chip has no integrated graphics solution.

PCIe support also differs. The Core 5 220H provides Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU, while the Core i5-14490F doubles that to 16 lanes on the same Gen 5 standard. This gives the desktop processor more headroom for expansion devices.

The physical die size is recorded only for the desktop chip at 215 mm². The mobile processor's die size is not listed in the database. The Core 5 220H launched on 2024-12-17 with a launch MSRP of $342. The Core i5-14490F released on 2023-12-31 with no launch MSRP recorded. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14490F wins every recorded benchmark comparison. The database shows 17 total wins for the desktop chip and 0 for the mobile chip across all tests. This is a comprehensive sweep with no exceptions.

The Core 5 220H still has a clear purpose as a mobile processor. Its 45 W TDP and integrated Iris Xe Graphics make it suitable for laptop systems where power efficiency and built-in display output matter. The desktop chip requires a discrete graphics card, which adds cost and power to a build.

For workloads where raw multi-threaded performance is the priority, the Core i5-14490F dominates. Its larger L3 cache and higher boost clock contribute to substantial leads in rendering and computational tasks. The desktop chip also wins in single-threaded tests, making it the better choice for responsive everyday use and lightly threaded applications.

The Core 5 220H's advantage lies in its form factor and platform. It occupies the mobile segment, allowing compact laptop designs with adequate performance. The desktop processor cannot serve that role. However, in any direct performance comparison, the Core i5-14490F is the clear victor.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 220H | Intel Core i5-14490F |

|----------------|-------------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 12 | 10 |

| Base Clock | 2.70 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-H | Raptor Lake-R |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 18 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 8 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | N/A |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 215 mm² |

| Release Date | 2024-12-17 | 2023-12-31 |

| Launch MSRP | $342 | Not recorded |

| Part Number | SRQ6SQ5MM | SRN35 |

Both processors share the same 10 nm process, dual-channel memory bus, DDR4/DDR5 support, and lack of ECC memory. Both are active production parts with locked multipliers.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest performance gap appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core testing. The Core i5-14490F scores 23000 against the Core 5 220H's 11198, a delta of -51.3%. This more than doubles the mobile chip's rendering output. The single-core R23 test shows a -42.9% delta, with scores of 3247 versus 1853.

The Cinebench R20 results follow a similar pattern. Multi-core scores of 9660 versus 7812 produce a -19.1% delta. Single-core R20 shows 1363 versus 1102, also -19.1%. The R15 tests show narrower margins: multi-core at 2318 versus 1835 (-20.8%) and single-core at 327 versus 262 (-19.9%).

PassMark tests reveal consistent advantages for the desktop processor. Extended instructions show the largest non-render gap at -32.6%, with scores of 21731 versus 14642. Prime number finding follows at -32.8% (122 versus 82). Physics tests show -29.4% (2093 versus 1478).

Data compression results show 340026 versus 247921, a -27.1% delta. Multi-threaded performance delivers 28662 versus 21884 (-23.6%). Floating point math scores 66558 versus 51671 (-22.4%). Random string sorting hits 35608 versus 28438 (-20.1%).

The closest margin appears in single-threaded PassMark testing. The Core i5-14490F scores 3873 against 3405, a -12.1% delta. Data encryption shows -16.5% (18225 versus 15216), while integer math records -16.3% (87844 versus 73555).

The Core 5 220H's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD EPYC 7203P with an average score of 28583 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS at 28549 (0.1% delta), and the Intel Xeon E-2436 at 28530 (0.2% delta). The Intel Core i5-12600 scores 28646, a -0.3% delta.

The Core i5-14490F sits among stronger competitors. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T averages 38194 (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38103 (0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 reaches 38221 (-0.2% delta), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX records 38261 (-0.3% delta).

The Verdict

The benchmark data delivers an unambiguous conclusion: the Intel Core i5-14490F outperforms the Intel Core 5 220H in every recorded test. Seventeen wins to zero leaves no ambiguity. The desktop processor leads by margins ranging from -12.1% in single-threaded PassMark to -51.3% in Cinebench R23 multi-core.

The Core i5-14490F is the choice for desktop users who need maximum compute throughput. Its 10 cores and 16 threads, combined with 24 MB of L3 cache and a 5.00 GHz boost clock, deliver superior results across rendering, encryption, compression, and mathematical workloads. The 86th percentile ranking versus 80th for the mobile chip confirms its higher standing in the overall CPU landscape.

The Core 5 220H serves a different purpose. As a mobile processor on the Intel BGA 1744 socket, it targets laptops where the 45 W TDP and integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU enable compact system designs. Its 12 cores provide adequate threading for portable workloads, and the 4.90 GHz boost clock keeps single-threaded performance competitive within its class.

The specification differences reinforce the performance split. The desktop chip offers more PCIe lanes (16 versus 8), a larger shared L3 cache (24 MB versus 18 MB), and a higher boost clock. The mobile chip counters with more physical cores (12 versus 10) and a lower power envelope. These tradeoffs define distinct use cases rather than direct competition.

For pure computing power, the Core i5-14490F is the superior part. For mobile integration, the Core 5 220H is the only viable option of the two. The data does not support any scenario where the Core 5 220H wins a head-to-head performance comparison, but its platform advantages make it the appropriate choice for portable systems.