Intel Core 5 220H vs Intel Core i5-14401E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data presents a split result between the Intel Core 5 220H and the Intel Core i5-14401E. Across the six Cinebench tests, the Core 5 220H takes four wins, while the Core i5-14401E claims two, but the margin of victory in the i5-14401E's wins is substantially larger.

Starting with the older Cinebench R15 tests, the Core 5 220H edges ahead in both multi-core and single-core. In R15 multi-core, the 220H scores 1835 against 1830 for the i5-14401E, a delta of 0.3%. The single-core R15 result shows the 220H at 262 versus 258, a 1.6% advantage. These are narrow margins, indicating near parity in this particular workload generation.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the 220H again takes both tests. The multi-core score is 7812 for the 220H against 7627 for the i5-14401E, a 2.4% lead. The single-core R20 test shows the 220H at 1102 versus 1076, also a 2.4% advantage. These results suggest that in R15 and R20, the mobile-oriented 220H holds a consistent, albeit modest, performance edge.

The picture changes dramatically in Cinebench R23. Here, the Core i5-14401E delivers a decisive reversal. In R23 multi-core, the i5-14401E scores 18161, while the 220H scores 11198. This represents a 38.3% lead for the i5-14401E, a massive swing in the desktop processor's favor. The R23 single-core test similarly favors the i5-14401E, with a score of 2564 against the 220H's 1853, a 27.7% advantage.

The average benchmark score data reinforces this split. The 220H has an average benchmark score of 28574, placing it in the 80th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7203P with an average score of 28583 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS at 28549 (0.1% delta), and the Intel Xeon E-2436 at 28530 (0.2% delta). The 220H also sits above the Intel Core i5-12600, which scores 28646, a -0.3% delta from the 220H.

In contrast, the i5-14401E has an average benchmark score of 5253, placing it in the 60th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 at 5259 (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core i7-11700B at 5241 (0.2% delta), the Intel Core i9-10850K at 5240 (0.2% delta), and the Intel Core i5-13400T at 5210 (0.8% delta). The 38.3% R23 multi-core swing is the single largest performance difference recorded between these two processors.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the majority of the head-to-head benchmark tests?

A: The Intel Core 5 220H wins four of the six head-to-head Cinebench tests, while the Intel Core i5-14401E wins the remaining two.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest gap is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Intel Core i5-14401E leads by 38.3%, scoring 18161 versus 11198 for the Core 5 220H.

Q: How do the two processors compare in single-core workloads?

A: The results are mixed. In Cinebench R15 and R20 single-core, the Core 5 220H leads by 1.6% and 2.4% respectively. However, in Cinebench R23 single-core, the Core i5-14401E leads by 27.7%, scoring 2564 versus 1853.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 220H ranks in the 80th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-14401E ranks in the 60th percentile.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 220H has a significantly higher average benchmark score of 28574, compared to the Intel Core i5-14401E's average score of 5253.

Q: Are there any close rivals for each processor in the database?

A: For the Core 5 220H, the AMD EPYC 7203P is the closest rival with a 0% delta in average score. For the Core i5-14401E, the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 is the closest rival with a -0.1% delta.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share the same underlying Raptor Lake architecture, but they are configured for different market segments. The Intel Core 5 220H is a mobile processor using the Raptor Lake-H codename, while the Intel Core i5-14401E is a desktop processor using the Raptor Lake-R codename. Both are built on Intel's 10 nm process node and are produced by Intel's foundry.

The core configurations differ substantially. The 220H contains 12 cores and 16 threads, while the i5-14401E contains 6 cores and 12 threads. This means the 220H has double the core count of the i5-14401E, but the i5-14401E has a higher thread-to-core ratio (2.0 threads per core versus 1.33 for the 220H).

Cache hierarchies also diverge. Both processors have an L1 cache of 80 KB per core. However, the L2 cache differs: the 220H has 2 MB per core, while the i5-14401E has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is shared, with the 220H offering 18 MB and the i5-14401E offering 20 MB.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The 220H uses Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units, while the i5-14401E uses the more basic UHD Graphics 730. This reflects the mobile versus desktop positioning, where the 220H is expected to handle graphics duties without a discrete GPU in many portable systems.

PCI Express support shows a clear difference. The 220H provides Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the i5-14401E provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The desktop part offers double the PCIe lanes, which is typical for a socketed desktop platform with more expansion options.

Memory support is identical in type, with both supporting DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. However, ECC memory support differs: the i5-14401E supports ECC memory, while the 220H does not. This makes the i5-14401E suitable for error-correcting memory setups commonly found in workstation or server environments.

The socket types are entirely different. The 220H uses Intel BGA 1744, a ball-grid array for soldered mobile installation, while the i5-14401E uses Intel Socket 1700, a land-grid array for desktop mounting. The die size is recorded for the i5-14401E at 215 mm², while no die size is recorded for the 220H.

Specification Differences

The specification table shows several key differences between the two processors. The core count differs: 12 cores for the Core 5 220H versus 6 cores for the Core i5-14401E. Thread counts are 16 for the 220H and 12 for the i5-14401E.

Base clock speeds are 2.70 GHz for the 220H and 2.50 GHz for the i5-14401E. Boost clock speeds are 4.90 GHz for the 220H and 4.70 GHz for the i5-14401E. The 220H holds the higher clocks in both cases.

Thermal design power (TDP) differs significantly. The 220H has a TDP of 45 watts, while the i5-14401E has a TDP of 65 watts. The desktop part consumes more power by specification.

The market segments are opposite: the 220H is a mobile processor, and the i5-14401E is a desktop processor. Their sockets reflect this, with the 220H using Intel BGA 1744 and the i5-14401E using Intel Socket 1700.

Cache specifications differ in L2 and L3. The 220H has 2 MB of L2 per core, while the i5-14401E has 1.25 MB per core. The shared L3 is 18 MB for the 220H and 20 MB for the i5-14401E.

PCIe lane counts differ: 8 lanes for the 220H versus 16 lanes for the i5-14401E, both at Gen 5. Integrated graphics differ, with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on the 220H and UHD Graphics 730 on the i5-14401E.

ECC memory support is present on the i5-14401E but absent on the 220H. The release dates differ, with the 220H released later. The 220H has a launch MSRP of $342, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the i5-14401E. The 220H has a part number of SRQ6SQ5MM, and the i5-14401E has a part number of Q49JSRNJS. Both are unlocked in terms of multiplier, meaning neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates two very different performance profiles. The Intel Core 5 220H shows strength in Cinebench R15 and R20, winning all four of those tests with margins ranging from 0.3% to 2.4%. Its average benchmark score of 28574 places it in the 80th percentile, far ahead of the i5-14401E's average score of 5253 and 60th percentile ranking.

However, the Cinebench R23 results tell a different story. The i5-14401E's 38.3% multi-core lead and 27.7% single-core lead are substantial, suggesting that in the most demanding modern rendering workloads, the desktop part is clearly superior. This is consistent with the i5-14401E's higher TDP of 65 watts versus 45 watts for the 220H, allowing the desktop processor to sustain higher performance under load.

The choice between these processors depends on the use case. The Core 5 220H is a mobile processor with 12 cores, 16 threads, and a higher base and boost clock. It is designed for portable systems where the 45-watt TDP and BGA 1744 socket are appropriate. The i5-14401E is a desktop processor with 6 cores, 12 threads, and a lower base clock but a significantly higher Cinebench R23 performance. It supports ECC memory and offers 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, making it suitable for desktop workstations that require error-correcting memory and more expansion capability.

The data shows that the 220H is the better performer in the older R15 and R20 tests, while the i5-14401E dominates in R23. The 220H's higher average benchmark score is driven by its performance across a broader set of PassMark tests, including data compression (247921), floating point math (51671), and integer math (73555), none of which are recorded for the i5-14401E. This makes the average score comparison incomplete, as the i5-14401E lacks data for those additional tests.

For users prioritizing the highest multi-core rendering performance in a desktop workstation with ECC support, the i5-14401E is the clear choice based on the R23 data. For users needing a mobile processor with more cores and higher clock speeds, the 220H fits that role. The i5-14401E's 38.3% lead in R23 multi-core is the defining performance difference between the two parts.