Intel Core 5 220H vs Intel Core 9 273PTE Comparison

Intel Core 5 220H and Intel Core 9 273PTE are both 12-core Intel parts, but the benchmark data shows they are built for very different jobs. The Core 9 273PTE is the clear performance leader, winning 16 of the 17 recorded head-to-head tests, while the Core 5 220H manages a single win. The average benchmark score for the Core 9 273PTE is 31143, which places it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 5 220H scores 28574, putting it in the 80th percentile. This is a matchup where the higher-tier part dominates most workloads, but the specific nature of that dominance matters for real-world use.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result in the database is the Cinebench R23 multi-core test. The Intel Core 9 273PTE scores 20445, which is 45.2% ahead of the Core 5 220H’s 11198. That is a massive gap, and it indicates the Core 9 273PTE has a substantial advantage in sustained multi-threaded rendering workloads. The single-core R23 score tells a similar story, with the Core 9 273PTE at 2886 versus 1853 for the Core 5 220H, a 35.8% lead. These are the largest deltas in the entire comparison, and they suggest the Core 9 273PTE is not just a multi-thread monster but also has much stronger per-core performance.

Older Cinebench versions show a tighter race. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Core 9 273PTE wins with 2060 against 1835, a 10.9% advantage. The R20 multi-core result is similar: 8586 versus 7812, a 9% lead. Single-core results in these older tests are closer as well, with R15 single-core at 290 versus 262 (9.7% lead) and R20 single-core at 1212 versus 1102 (9.1% lead). This pattern suggests that as the test becomes more demanding and modern, the Core 9 273PTE pulls further ahead.

PassMark results show a mixed bag. The Core 9 273PTE wins the integer math test with 82411 versus 73555, a 10.7% lead. In floating point math, it scores 60673 against 51671, a 14.8% advantage. The Core 9 273PTE also wins the physics test by a wide margin, 1917 versus 1478, which is a 22.9% difference. Prime number finding is another big win for the Core 9 273PTE, with 142 versus 82, a 42.3% lead. Extended instructions go to the Core 9 273PTE as well, 15952 versus 14642, an 8.2% edge.

The single win for the Intel Core 5 220H comes in data encryption, where it scores 15216 versus 14253, a 6.8% advantage. This is an interesting outlier, as the Core 5 220H appears to have an edge in this specific cryptographic workload despite losing nearly everything else. Data compression is close, with the Core 9 273PTE winning 258704 versus 247921, a 4.2% lead. Random string sorting is nearly identical, with the Core 9 273PTE at 28973 and the Core 5 220H at 28438, a 1.8% difference. The single-thread PassMark score is also close, with the Core 9 273PTE at 3433 and the Core 5 220H at 3405, a 0.8% lead.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use different underlying designs. The Intel Core 5 220H is based on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-H codename, and it belongs to the Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. The Intel Core 9 273PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 9 (Bartlett Lake) generation. Both are manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel’s foundry, but the architectural lineage differs significantly.

Core count is identical at 12, but the thread count differs. The Core 5 220H has 16 threads, while the Core 9 273PTE has 24 threads. The Core 9 273PTE delivers more simultaneous processing threads, which directly explains its dominance in multi-threaded Cinebench tests. Cache allocation also differs. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core, but the shared L3 cache is much larger on the Core 9 273PTE: 36 MB shared versus 18 MB shared on the Core 5 220H. This doubling of L3 cache likely contributes to the Core 9 273PTE’s advantage in workloads that benefit from large shared data pools.

Clock speeds are a major differentiator. The Core 5 220H has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Core 9 273PTE has a much lower base clock of 1.40 GHz but a significantly higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The lower base clock on the Core 9 273PTE is unusual, but the higher boost clock and the additional threads allow it to outperform in most tests. The memory bus is dual-channel for both, and both support DDR4 and DDR5. The Core 9 273PTE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core 5 220H does not have a bandwidth figure in the database.

PCIe support differs. The Core 5 220H has Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the Core 9 273PTE has Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Core 9 273PTE offers double the CPU PCIe lanes. Integrated graphics also differ, with the Core 5 220H using Iris Xe Graphics 80EU and the Core 9 273PTE using UHD Graphics 730. The Core 9 273PTE supports ECC memory, while the Core 5 220H does not. The Core 5 220H uses an Intel BGA 1744 socket, while the Core 9 273PTE uses Intel Socket 1700. The market segment is mobile for the Core 5 220H and desktop for the Core 9 273PTE.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Intel Core 9 273PTE for almost every performance metric. Its 45.2% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 35.8% lead in R23 single-core are decisive. The 24 threads versus 16 threads give it a structural advantage in heavily parallel workloads. The larger 36 MB L3 cache and higher 5.50 GHz boost clock support its superior single-core and multi-core results. The Core 9 273PTE also has a higher average benchmark score of 31143 and sits in the 82nd percentile, compared to the Core 5 220H’s 28574 and 80th percentile.

The Intel Core 5 220H is not without merit. It wins the data encryption test by 6.8%, and it has a lower base clock that could indicate different power characteristics, though the database does not provide wattage figures beyond the 45 W TDP for both. The Core 5 220H is a mobile part, while the Core 9 273PTE is a desktop part. For a laptop platform, the Core 5 220H is the relevant choice, and its performance is competitive with the Core 9 273PTE in single-threaded PassMark tests, trailing by only 0.8%. However, for desktop users who need maximum multi-threaded throughput, the Core 9 273PTE is the superior option based on every major benchmark in the database.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs share the same core count, manufacturer, process node, foundry, TDP, memory support, and memory bus type. They differ in nearly every other recorded specification. The Core 5 220H has 16 threads, while the Core 9 273PTE has 24 threads. Base clocks are 2.70 GHz versus 1.40 GHz. Boost clocks are 4.90 GHz versus 5.50 GHz. The Core 5 220H uses Intel BGA 1744, while the Core 9 273PTE uses Intel Socket 1700. The architecture is Raptor Lake for the Core 5 220H, while the Core 9 273PTE uses Bartlett Lake. The codename is Raptor Lake-H for the Core 5 220H and Bartlett Lake for the Core 9 273PTE. The generation is Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) versus Core 9 (Bartlett Lake). The L3 cache is 18 MB shared on the Core 5 220H and 36 MB shared on the Core 9 273PTE. The Core 9 273PTE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core 5 220H has none. ECC memory is supported on the Core 9 273PTE, but not on the Core 5 220H. PCIe lanes are 8 on the Core 5 220H and 16 on the Core 9 273PTE. Integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on the Core 5 220H and UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 9 273PTE. The market segment is Mobile for the Core 5 220H and Desktop for the Core 9 273PTE. The release date for the Core 5 220H is 2024-12-17, while the Core 9 273PTE is dated 2026-03-08. The part numbers are SRQ6SQ5MM for the Core 5 220H and SA4QJ for the Core 9 273PTE.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 24 threads, while the Intel Core 5 220H has 16 threads.

Q: What is the biggest benchmark difference between the two?

A: The largest delta is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Intel Core 9 273PTE scores 20445, which is 45.2% higher than the Intel Core 5 220H’s 11198.

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 220H win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, it wins the PassMark data encryption test with a score of 15216, which is 6.8% higher than the Core 9 273PTE’s 14253.

Q: How do their single-thread scores compare?

A: In PassMark single-thread, the Core 9 273PTE scores 3433, which is only 0.8% higher than the Core 5 220H’s 3405. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Core 9 273PTE leads by 35.8%, with 2886 versus 1853.

Q: Do they use the same socket?

A: No. The Intel Core 5 220H uses Intel BGA 1744, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Which CPU has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, double the 18 MB found on the Intel Core 5 220H.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PTE wins in almost every category. Its 24 threads and higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz make it the clear choice for multi-threaded rendering, as shown by the 45.2% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core. It also wins in integer math by 10.7%, floating point math by 14.8%, physics by 22.9%, and prime number finding by 42.3%. For heavy desktop workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or scientific simulations, the Core 9 273PTE is the stronger part based on the recorded data. Its 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes also provide more expansion capability for desktop systems.

The Intel Core 5 220H wins only in data encryption, where it holds a 6.8% advantage. For a mobile platform, this is a niche but real benefit in security-focused tasks. The Core 5 220H also has a much higher base clock of 2.70 GHz versus 1.40 GHz, which could make it more responsive in short bursts of activity, though the benchmark results do not show a consistent single-thread advantage. Its Iris Xe Graphics 80EU is a different integrated GPU compared to the UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 9 273PTE. For a laptop user who needs a mobile CPU with competitive single-thread performance, the Core 5 220H is the relevant choice, and its close PassMark single-thread score of 3405 versus 3433 shows it is not far behind in that specific metric. The Core 5 220H is also the more recent part in terms of release date, with 2024-12-17 versus 2026-03-08, though the Core 9 273PTE is the newer release.